Literature DB >> 18158655

Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31.

John Norcini1, Vanessa Burch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been concern that trainees are seldom observed, assessed, and given feedback during their workplace-based education. This has led to an increasing interest in a variety of formative assessment methods that require observation and offer the opportunity for feedback. AIMS: To review some of the literature on the efficacy and prevalence of formative feedback, describe the common formative assessment methods, characterize the nature of feedback, examine the effect of faculty development on its quality, and summarize the challenges still faced.
RESULTS: The research literature on formative assessment and feedback suggests that it is a powerful means for changing the behaviour of trainees. Several methods for assessing it have been developed and there is preliminary evidence of their reliability and validity. A variety of factors enhance the efficacy of workplace-based assessment including the provision of feedback that is consistent with the needs of the learner and focused on important aspects of the performance. Faculty plays a critical role and successful implementation requires that they receive training.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for formative assessment which offers trainees the opportunity for feedback. Several good methods exist and feedback has been shown to have a major influence on learning. The critical role of faculty is highlighted, as is the need for strategies to enhance their participation and training.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18158655     DOI: 10.1080/01421590701775453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  151 in total

1.  Significant transfer of surgical skills obtained with an advanced laparoscopic training program to a laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy in a live porcine model: feasibility of learning advanced laparoscopy in a general surgery residency.

Authors:  Julián Varas; Ricardo Mejía; Arnoldo Riquelme; Felipe Maluenda; Erwin Buckel; José Salinas; Jorge Martínez; Rajesh Aggarwal; Nicolás Jarufe; Camilo Boza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The reliability of in-training assessment when performance improvement is taken into account.

Authors:  Mirjam T van Lohuizen; Jan B M Kuks; Elisabeth A van Hell; A N Raat; Roy E Stewart; Janke Cohen-Schotanus
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Introduction, development, and evaluation of the miniclinical evaluation exercise in postgraduate education of chiropractors.

Authors:  Inga Paravicini; Cynthia K Peterson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2014-11-19

4.  Introduction of Directly Observed Procedural Skills (DOPS) as a Part of Competency-Based Medical Education in Otorhinolaryngology.

Authors:  Mohan Bansal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-02-20

Review 5.  Workplace-based Assessment; Applications and Educational Impact.

Authors:  Salman Yousuf Guraya
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015-11

6.  Essential facets of competence that enable trust in graduates: a delphi study among physician educators in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marjo Wijnen-Meijer; Marieke van der Schaaf; Kirstin Nillesen; Sigrid Harendza; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-03

7.  Simulation-trained junior residents perform better than general surgeons on advanced laparoscopic cases.

Authors:  Camilo Boza; Felipe León; Erwin Buckel; Arnoldo Riquelme; Fernando Crovari; Jorge Martínez; Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Nicolás Jarufe; Julián Varas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  [Promouvoir une rétroaction de grande qualité: Outil d'examen de la rétroaction donnée aux apprenants par les enseignants].

Authors:  Jane M Griffiths; Ulemu Luhanga; Laura April McEwen; Karen Schultz; Nancy Dalgarno
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Promoting high-quality feedback: Tool for reviewing feedback given to learners by teachers.

Authors:  Jane M Griffiths; Ulemu Luhanga; Laura April McEwen; Karen Schultz; Nancy Dalgarno
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers.

Authors:  Cornelia R M G Fluit; Sanneke Bolhuis; Richard Grol; Roland Laan; Michel Wensing
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.