Literature DB >> 33494610

Property-Unmatched Decoys in Docking Benchmarks.

Reed M Stein1, Ying Yang1, Trent E Balius2, Matt J O'Meara3, Jiankun Lyu1, Jennifer Young1, Khanh Tang1, Brian K Shoichet1, John J Irwin1.   

Abstract

Enrichment of ligands versus property-matched decoys is widely used to test and optimize docking library screens. However, the unconstrained optimization of enrichment alone can mislead, leading to false confidence in prospective performance. This can arise by over-optimizing for enrichment against property-matched decoys, without considering the full spectrum of molecules to be found in a true large library screen. Adding decoys representing charge extrema helps mitigate over-optimizing for electrostatic interactions. Adding decoys that represent the overall characteristics of the library to be docked allows one to sample molecules not represented by ligands and property-matched decoys but that one will encounter in a prospective screen. An optimized version of the DUD-E set (DUDE-Z), as well as Extrema and sets representing broad features of the library (Goldilocks), is developed here. We also explore the variability that one can encounter in enrichment calculations and how that can temper one's confidence in small enrichment differences. The new tools and new decoy sets are freely available at http://tldr.docking.org and http://dudez.docking.org.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33494610      PMCID: PMC7913603          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  91 in total

Review 1.  Screening in a spirit haunted world.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 2.  The influence of lead discovery strategies on the properties of drug candidates.

Authors:  György M Keserü; Gergely M Makara
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Docking for fragment inhibitors of AmpC beta-lactamase.

Authors:  Denise G Teotico; Kerim Babaoglu; Gabriel J Rocklin; Rafaela S Ferreira; Anthony M Giannetti; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays.

Authors:  Jonathan B Baell; Georgina A Holloway
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Orientational sampling and rigid-body minimization in molecular docking revisited: on-the-fly optimization and degeneracy removal.

Authors:  D A Gschwend; I D Kuntz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Time-efficient flexible superposition of medium-sized molecules.

Authors:  C Lemmen; T Lengauer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Structure-Guided Screening for Functionally Selective D2 Dopamine Receptor Ligands from a Virtual Chemical Library.

Authors:  Barbara Männel; Mariama Jaiteh; Alexey Zeifman; Alena Randakova; Dorothee Möller; Harald Hübner; Peter Gmeiner; Jens Carlsson
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 8.  Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 22.384

9.  Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation.

Authors:  J M Word; S C Lovell; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01-29       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  RADER: a RApid DEcoy Retriever to facilitate decoy based assessment of virtual screening.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Xiaoqian Pang; Yecheng Li; Ziying Zhang; Wen Tan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  10 in total

1.  Efficient Hit-to-Lead Searching of Kinase Inhibitor Chemical Space via Computational Fragment Merging.

Authors:  Grigorii V Andrianov; Wern Juin Gabriel Ong; Ilya Serebriiskii; John Karanicolas
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Structure-based inhibitor optimization for the Nsp3 Macrodomain of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Stefan Gahbauer; Galen J Correy; Marion Schuller; Matteo P Ferla; Yagmur Umay Doruk; Moira Rachman; Taiasean Wu; Morgan Diolaiti; Siyi Wang; R Jeffrey Neitz; Daren Fearon; Dmytro Radchenko; Yurii Moroz; John J Irwin; Adam R Renslo; Jenny C Taylor; Jason E Gestwicki; Frank von Delft; Alan Ashworth; Ivan Ahel; Brian K Shoichet; James S Fraser
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Structures of the σ2 receptor enable docking for bioactive ligand discovery.

Authors:  Assaf Alon; Jiankun Lyu; Joao M Braz; Tia A Tummino; Veronica Craik; Matthew J O'Meara; Chase M Webb; Dmytro S Radchenko; Yurii S Moroz; Xi-Ping Huang; Yongfeng Liu; Bryan L Roth; John J Irwin; Allan I Basbaum; Brian K Shoichet; Andrew C Kruse
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 69.504

4.  Fragment binding to the Nsp3 macrodomain of SARS-CoV-2 identified through crystallographic screening and computational docking.

Authors:  Marion Schuller; Galen J Correy; Stefan Gahbauer; Daren Fearon; Taiasean Wu; Roberto Efraín Díaz; Iris D Young; Luan Carvalho Martins; Dominique H Smith; Ursula Schulze-Gahmen; Tristan W Owens; Ishan Deshpande; Gregory E Merz; Aye C Thwin; Justin T Biel; Jessica K Peters; Michelle Moritz; Nadia Herrera; Huong T Kratochvil; Anthony Aimon; James M Bennett; Jose Brandao Neto; Aina E Cohen; Alexandre Dias; Alice Douangamath; Louise Dunnett; Oleg Fedorov; Matteo P Ferla; Martin R Fuchs; Tyler J Gorrie-Stone; James M Holton; Michael G Johnson; Tobias Krojer; George Meigs; Ailsa J Powell; Johannes Gregor Matthias Rack; Victor L Rangel; Silvia Russi; Rachael E Skyner; Clyde A Smith; Alexei S Soares; Jennifer L Wierman; Kang Zhu; Peter O'Brien; Natalia Jura; Alan Ashworth; John J Irwin; Michael C Thompson; Jason E Gestwicki; Frank von Delft; Brian K Shoichet; James S Fraser; Ivan Ahel
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 14.957

5.  Prediction of Binding Free Energy of Protein-Ligand Complexes with a Hybrid Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area and Machine Learning Method.

Authors:  Lina Dong; Xiaoyang Qu; Yuan Zhao; Binju Wang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-11-21

6.  Optimization of Cavity-Based Negative Images to Boost Docking Enrichment in Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Sami T Kurkinen; Jukka V Lehtonen; Olli T Pentikäinen; Pekka A Postila
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Ligand-Enhanced Negative Images Optimized for Docking Rescoring.

Authors:  Sami T Kurkinen; Jukka V Lehtonen; Olli T Pentikäinen; Pekka A Postila
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 6.208

8.  PyPLIF HIPPOS and Receptor Ensemble Docking Increase the Prediction Accuracy of the Structure-Based Virtual Screening Protocol Targeting Acetylcholinesterase.

Authors:  Enade P Istyastono; Florentinus Dika Octa Riswanto; Nunung Yuniarti; Vivitri D Prasasty; Sudi Mungkasi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.927

9.  FastGrow: on-the-fly growing and its application to DYRK1A.

Authors:  Patrick Penner; Virginie Martiny; Louis Bellmann; Florian Flachsenberg; Marcus Gastreich; Isabelle Theret; Christophe Meyer; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.179

Review 10.  Computational Modeling as a Tool to Investigate PPI: From Drug Design to Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Juan J Perez; Roman A Perez; Alberto Perez
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-05-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.