| Literature DB >> 28758940 |
Muhammad Abdullah1,2,3, Joe N Kornegay4, Aubree Honcoop5, Traci L Parry6,7, Cynthia J Balog-Alvarez8, Sara K O'Neal9, James R Bain10,11, Michael J Muehlbauer12, Christopher B Newgard13,14, Cam Patterson15, Monte S Willis16,17,18.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Like Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the Golden Retriever Muscular Dystrophy (GRMD) dog model of DMD is characterized by muscle necrosis, progressive paralysis, and pseudohypertrophy in specific skeletal muscles. This severe GRMD phenotype includes moderate atrophy of the biceps femoris (BF) as compared to unaffected normal dogs, while the long digital extensor (LDE), which functions to flex the tibiotarsal joint and serves as a digital extensor, undergoes the most pronounced atrophy. A recent microarray analysis of GRMD identified alterations in genes associated with lipid metabolism and energy production.Entities:
Keywords: Duchenne muscular dystrophy; golden retriever muscular dystrophy; metabolism; non-targeted metabolomics; skeletal muscle
Year: 2017 PMID: 28758940 PMCID: PMC5618323 DOI: 10.3390/metabo7030038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1Untargeted metabolomics analysis of golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) biceps femoris (BF) muscle. (A) Supervised clustering of GRMD BF metabolites using Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA); (B) The top metabolites ranked by VIP scores; (C) Heatmap of t-test significant metabolites identified in GRMD BF vs. age-matched controls. Analysis by Metaboanalyst analysis of GRMD (N = 6) vs. control (N = 4) BF metabolites.
Figure 2Pathway enrichment analysis of t-test significant metabolites from GRMD biceps femoris (BF) muscle. (A) Pathway analysis of t-test significant metabolites; (B) Enrichment analysis of t-test significant metabolites using pathway dataset for comparison; (C) Comparison of Peak values of t-test significant metabolites. Analysis by Metaboanalyst analysis of GRMD (N = 6) vs. control (N = 4) BF metabolites. Data is presented as the mean +/- SEM.
Figure 3Untargeted metabolomics analysis of GRMD long digital extensor (LDE) muscle. (A) Supervised clustering of GRMD LDE metabolites using Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA); (B) The top metabolites ranked by VIP scores; (C) Heatmap of t-test significant metabolites identified in GRMD BF vs. age-matched controls. Analysis by Metaboanalyst analysis of GRMD (N = 6) vs. control (N = 4) long digital extensor metabolites; (D) Peak values of significant metabolites identified in GRMD LDE vs. control LDE.
Figure 4One-Way ANOVA analysis of GRMD long digital extensor (LDE) and biceps femoris (BF). (A) Heatmap of ANOVA significant metabolites from control and GRMD LDE and BF; (B) Pathway analysis of ANOVA significant metabolites; (C) Pathway analysis of ANOVA significant metabolites. Analysis by Metaboanalyst analysis of GRMD (N = 6) vs. control (N = 4) LDE metabolites.
Figure 5Comparison of Peak values of ANOVA metabolites in GRMD LDE and BF muscles by untargeted metabolomics. Peak values of GRMD LDE and BF (A) phosphoric acid; (B) stearamide; (C) lactamide; and (D) myosinositol-2-phosphate. Analysis by Metaboanalyst analysis of GRMD (N = 6) vs. control (N = 4) long digital extensor metabolites. Data is presented as the mean +/- SEM.
Figure 6Significantly altered metabolites in the b-Alanine and Arginine/Proline metabolic pathways. (A) Carnosine decreased in BF by t-test and ANOVA; (B) Glutamic acid increased by in BF by t-test and ANOVA; (C) Proline increased in BF by t-test.
Figure 7Significantly altered metabolites in the Krebs (TCA) Cycle in GRMD BF muscle by untargeted metabolomics. (A) Significantly decreased fumaric acid (One-Way ANOVA); (B) significantly decreased malic acid (t-test), with decreased (not significant by post-hoc t-test analysis); in (C) Citric/Isocitric acid; and (D) Succinic acid. Data is presented as the mean +/- SEM.
Figure 8Integrated metabolomics analysis using recently published microarray analysis. Fisher’s exact test using degree centrality was performed using (A) Gene-metabolite pathways or (B) Gene-centric pathways in Metaboanalyst. GRMD significant metabolites (t-test, VIP >2.0 listed in Table S2) and mRNA >1.9 or < −1.3 fold from GRMD muscle (downloaded from GEO, as published in Pediatr Res. 2016 Apr;79(4):629-36) and listed in Table S3 with fold change calculations) were included in the Metaboanalyst integrated analysis.