| Literature DB >> 26838588 |
Ladislav Valkovič1,2,3,4, Marek Chmelík1,2, Barbara Ukropcová5,6, Thomas Heckmann7, Wolfgang Bogner1,2, Ivan Frollo3, Harald Tschan7, Michael Krebs8, Norbert Bachl7, Jozef Ukropec5, Siegfried Trattnig1,2, Martin Krššák1,2,8.
Abstract
Defects in skeletal muscle energy metabolism are indicative of systemic disorders such as obesity or type 2 diabetes. Phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((31)P-MRS), in particularly dynamic (31)P-MRS, provides a powerful tool for the non-invasive investigation of muscular oxidative metabolism. The increase in spectral and temporal resolution of (31)P-MRS at ultra high fields (i.e., 7T) uncovers new potential for previously implemented techniques, e.g., saturation transfer (ST) or highly resolved static spectra. In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences in muscle metabolism between overweight-to-obese sedentary (Ob/Sed) and lean active (L/Ac) individuals through dynamic, static, and ST (31)P-MRS at 7T. In addition, as the dynamic (31)P-MRS requires a complex setup and patient exercise, our aim was to identify an alternative technique that might provide a biomarker of oxidative metabolism. The Ob/Sed group exhibited lower mitochondrial capacity, and, in addition, static (31)P-MRS also revealed differences in the Pi-to-ATP exchange flux, the alkaline Pi-pool, and glycero-phosphocholine concentrations between the groups. In addition to these differences, we have identified correlations between dynamically measured oxidative flux and static concentrations of the alkaline Pi-pool and glycero-phosphocholine, suggesting the possibility of using high spectral resolution (31)P-MRS data, acquired at rest, as a marker of oxidative metabolism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26838588 PMCID: PMC4738275 DOI: 10.1038/srep20087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of the studied groups and results of muscle energy metabolism measurements via static 31P-MRS, saturation transfer, and dynamic experiments.
| Variable | Overweight Obese/Sedentary | Lean/Active |
|---|---|---|
| N (female) | 14 (5)° | 15 (5) |
| Age (years) | 34.6 ± 7.1 | 29.3 ± 5.5 |
| BMI (kg.m−2) | 30.4 ± 2.3 | 23.1 ± 2.6* |
| Body fat (%) | 35.2 ± 7.1 | 18.3 ± 6.1* |
| LBM (kg) | 62.4 ± 10.9 | 63.0 ± 15.6 |
| VO2max (mL.min−1.kg−1) | 36.8 ± 5.3 | 45.9 ± 3.1* |
| Steps per 24 hours | 6052 ± 1166 | 11093 ± 4074* |
| [PDE] (mM) | 4.21 ± 1.12 | 2.82 ± 1.00* |
| [GPC] (mM) | 3.95 ± 1.04 | 2.47 ± 0.98* |
| [GPE] (mM) | 0.26 ± 0.27 | 0.23 ± 0.17 |
| [Pi2] (mM) | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.28 ± 0.06* |
| Pi2/Pi | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02* |
| pHrest | 7.06 ± 0.04 | 7.05 ± 0.03 |
| [ADP]rest(μM) | 10.1 ± 0.9 | 9.8 ± 0.6 |
| kATP (s−1) | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
| FATP (mM.s−1) | 0.25 ± 0.06 | 0.31 ± 0.04† |
| kCK (s−1) | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.25 ± 0.05 |
| FCK (mM.s−1) | 9.26 ± 2.36 | 8.66 ± 2.40 |
| PCr drop (% signal) | 38.4 ± 19.4 | 40.4 ± 13.9 |
| τPCr (s) | 40.9 ± 14.0 | 42.6 ± 15.8 |
| VPCr (mM.s−1) | 0.29 ± 0.10 | 0.32 ± 0.07 |
| Qmax (mM.s−1) | 0.50 ± 0.08 | 0.58 ± 0.07† |
| pHend_exercise | 6.97 ± 0.14 | 6.90 ± 0.16 |
| [ADP]end exercise(μM) | 47.8 ± 32.0 | 40.9 ± 15.5 |
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation. °For one volunteer from the overweight-to-obese sedentary group, only dynamic experiment data are available. Significant differences (unpaired t-test) between the groups are depicted as follows: *p < 0.01; †p < 0.05.
Figure 1(a) An in vivo localizer image of the human thigh with the depicted coil position. (b) Highly spectrally resolved representative 31P-MR spectra from an obese sedentary and lean active subject, scaled to PCr signal intensity. The area of Pi and PDE peaks is enlarged. Note higher Pi2 and lower PDE signal intensity in the L/Ac subject. (c) Saturation transfer spectra showing the effect of γ-ATP saturation (solid line) on its chemical exchange partner, Pi, compared with the control experiment (dashed line). (d) Time course of the 31P spectra during a dynamic 31P-MRS experiment. Note the PCr signal depletion during exercise and its re-synthesis during recovery.
Figure 2Box plots depicting the significantly different physiological and metabolic parameters between the two groups.
The solid lines represent the median, boxes represent lower and upper quartiles, and whiskers the minimum and maximum. Outliers and extreme outliers are denoted by circles and stars, respectively. The outliers were also taken into account for all statistical tests.
Figure 3Plots of correlations between myocellular energy metabolism parameters measured by dynamic and static 31P-MRS in Ob/Sed () andL/Ac () individuals: (a) mitochondrial capacity (Qmax) with the Pi-to-ATP forward metabolic flux at rest (FATP); (b) Qmax with the ratio of alkaline Pi to main Pi (Pi2/Pi); and (c) Qmax with the concentration of phosphodiesters ([PDE]). Further correlations of the 31P-MRS parameters measured at rest: (d) FATP with [PDE]; (e) Pi2/Pi with [PDE]; and (f) Pi-to-ATP exchange rate constant (kATP) with Pi2/Pi. 95% confidence intervals are also depicted.
Results of multivariable stepwise regression of Qmax (dependent variable) and physiological and metabolic variables measured at rest (independent variable).
| Independent variables per Qmax | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pi2* | 22.035 | 0.0001 |
| FATP* | 14.653 | 0.0001 |
| Pi2/Pi | <0.05 | 0.217 |
| BMI | <0.05 | 0.536 |
| kATP | <0.05 | 0.537 |
| GPC | <0.05 | 0.689 |
| PDE | <0.05 | 0.940 |
| age | <0.05 | 0.961 |
*Variables accepted into the model as predictors; all other variables not accepted into the model.