Literature DB >> 24168276

Multiple attentional control settings influence late attentional selection but do not provide an early attentional filter.

Maha Adamo1, Carson Pun, Susanne Ferber.   

Abstract

When one is responding to targets containing a specific feature, non-predictive peripheral cues that share this feature lead to faster responses to the target, while cues that do not contain the target feature effectively are ignored, providing evidence for the role of attentional control settings (ACSs) in the contingent capture hypothesis. It is unclear, however, at what stage of processing multiple ACSs are implemented. We took advantage of the excellent temporal resolution of electroencephalography to demonstrate that the maintenance of multiple ACSs influences later stages of attentional selection rather than providing an early attentional filter. N2pc analyses for cues and targets revealed a similar degree of spatial capture for any peripheral cue, regardless of control settings, with target P3s reflecting the application of the ACS color contingencies.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 24168276     DOI: 10.1080/17588921003646149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 1758-8928            Impact factor:   3.065


  11 in total

1.  Limits in feature-based attention to multiple colors.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Michael Jigo
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  A meta-analysis of contingent-capture effects.

Authors:  Christian Büsel; Martin Voracek; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-31

3.  Task-irrelevant fear enhances amygdala-FFG inhibition and decreases subsequent face processing.

Authors:  Barbara Schulte Holthausen; Ute Habel; Thilo Kellermann; Patrick D Schelenz; Frank Schneider; J Christopher Edgar; Bruce I Turetsky; Christina Regenbogen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  On the precision of goal-directed attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Complex attentional control settings.

Authors:  Stacey E Parrott; Brian R Levinthal; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 6.  Feature-based attention: effects and control.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-03-23

7.  Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.

Authors:  David R Painter; Paul E Dux; Susan L Travis; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The costs of switching attentional sets.

Authors:  Isabel Dombrowe; Mieke Donk; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  A bottleneck model of set-specific capture.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Influence of Task-Irrelevant Flankers Depends on the Composition of Emotion Categories.

Authors:  Barbara Schulte Holthausen; Christina Regenbogen; Bruce I Turetsky; Frank Schneider; Ute Habel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.