Literature DB >> 28730663

Acceptance of a structured diagnostic interview in children, parents, and interviewers.

Murielle Neuschwander1, Tina In-Albon2, Andrea H Meyer3, Silvia Schneider1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the satisfaction and acceptance of a structured diagnostic interview in clinical practice and in a research setting. Using the Structured Diagnostic Interview for Mental Disorders in Children and Adolescents (Kinder-DIPS), 28 certified interviewers conducted 202 interviews (115 with parents, 87 with children). After each interview, children, parents, and interviewers completed a questionnaire assessing the overall satisfaction (0 = not at all satisfied to 100 = totally satisfied) and acceptance (0 = completely disagree to 3 = completely agree) with the interview. Satisfaction ratings were highly positive, all means >82. The mean of the overall acceptance for children was 2.43 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.41), 2.54 (SD = 0.33) of the parents, 2.30 (SD = 0.43) of the children's interviewers, and 2.46 (SD = 0.32) of the parents' interviewers. Using separate univariate regression models, significant predictors for higher satisfaction and acceptance with the interview are higher children's Global Assessment of Functioning, fewer number of children's diagnoses, shorter duration of the interview, a research setting, female sex of the interviewer, and older age of the interviewer. Results indicate that structured diagnostic interviews are highly accepted by children, parents, and interviewers. Importantly, this is true for different treatment settings.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinder-DIPS; acceptance; assessment; diagnostic; structured interview for children and adolescents

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28730663      PMCID: PMC6877120          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  17 in total

1.  Introducing a structured interview into a clinical setting.

Authors:  Margo Thienemann
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.829

2.  The acceptance of the K-SADS-PL - potential predictors for the overall satisfaction of parents and interviewers.

Authors:  Tina Matuschek; Sonia Jaeger; Stephanie Stadelmann; Katrin Dölling; Steffi Weis; Kai Von Klitzing; Madlen Grunewald; Andreas Hiemisch; Mirko Döhnert
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Diagnosis of nonpsychotic patients in community clinics.

Authors:  M K Shear; C Greeno; J Kang; D Ludewig; E Frank; H A Swartz; M Hanekamp
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Popular or unpopular? Therapists' use of structured interviews and their estimation of patient acceptance.

Authors:  Katrin Bruchmüller; Jürgen Margraf; Andrea Suppiger; Silvia Schneider
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2011-05-06

Review 5.  Evidence-based assessment of depression in adults.

Authors:  Thomas E Joiner; Rheeda L Walker; Jeremy W Pettit; Marisol Perez; Kelly C Cukrowicz
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2005-09

6.  Parent and child acceptability and staff evaluation of K-SADS-PL: a pilot study.

Authors:  Merete Juul Sørensen; Per Hove Thomsen; Niels Bilenberg
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Acceptance of structured diagnostic interviews for mental disorders in clinical practice and research settings.

Authors:  Andrea Suppiger; Tina In-Albon; Stephanie Hendriksen; Ernst Hermann; Jürgen Margraf; Silvia Schneider
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2008-11-05

8.  [Interrater reliability of the «Diagnostic Interview bei psychischen Störungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter (Kinder-DIPS)].

Authors:  Murielle Neuschwander; Tina In-Albon; Carmen Adornetto; Binia Roth; Silvia Schneider
Journal:  Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother       Date:  2013-09

9.  [Agreement of clinical diagnosis, structured interviews, and self-report questionnaires for depression in children and adolescents].

Authors:  Kathrin Dolle; Gerd Schulte-Körne; Nikolaus von Hofacker; Yonca Izat; Antje-Kathrin Allgaier
Journal:  Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother       Date:  2012-11

10.  MINI International Neuropsychiatric Schedule: clinical utility and patient acceptance.

Authors:  Narsimha R Pinninti; Harry Madison; Erica Musser; David Rissmiller
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.361

View more
  4 in total

1.  Acceptance of a structured diagnostic interview in children, parents, and interviewers.

Authors:  Murielle Neuschwander; Tina In-Albon; Andrea H Meyer; Silvia Schneider
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Anti-Suicide Function of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in Female Inpatient Adolescents.

Authors:  Laura Kraus; Marc Schmid; Tina In-Albon
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Psychophysiological mechanisms underlying the failure to speak: a comparison between children with selective mutism and social anxiety disorder on autonomic arousal.

Authors:  Felix Vogel; Christina Schwenck
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Do Metacognitions of Children and Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders Change after Intensified Exposure Therapy?

Authors:  Laura Marie Köcher; Verena Pflug; Silvia Schneider; Hanna Christiansen
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.