Literature DB >> 23109129

[Agreement of clinical diagnosis, structured interviews, and self-report questionnaires for depression in children and adolescents].

Kathrin Dolle1, Gerd Schulte-Körne, Nikolaus von Hofacker, Yonca Izat, Antje-Kathrin Allgaier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study examines the agreement of structured child and parent interviews as well as clinical diagnosis for depressive episodes in children and adolescents. Moreover, it compares the accuracy and optimal cutoff scores of self-report questionnaires with reference to each of these diagnostic assessments.
METHOD: 81 children (9-12 years) and 88 adolescents (13-16 years) in psychiatric care and their parents completed the structured diagnostic interview Kinder-DIPS. The children answered the German Children's Depression Inventory (CDI), and the adolescents answered the German Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Kappa coefficients quantified the agreement. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cutoff scores, sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values.
RESULTS: The agreement between the child and parent interviews as well as between the interviews and clinical diagnosis was low to moderate. Clinicians diagnosed depressive episodes more frequently than the interviews. Cutoff scores and measures of accuracy varied between the reference standards, with less favorable results for clinical diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians may profit from conducting structured interviews. Strategies for dealing with conflicting information from children and parents should be tested empirically and described in detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23109129     DOI: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother        ISSN: 1422-4917


  5 in total

1.  Acceptance of a structured diagnostic interview in children, parents, and interviewers.

Authors:  Murielle Neuschwander; Tina In-Albon; Andrea H Meyer; Silvia Schneider
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  [Anchor-based ascertaining of meaningful changes in depressive symptoms using the example of the German short form of the CES-D].

Authors:  Ingo Haase; Markus Winkeler; Hartmut Imgart
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr       Date:  2016-06-14

3.  Agreement between patients and mental healthcare providers on unmet care needs in child and adolescent psychiatry.

Authors:  Richard Vijverberg; Robert Ferdinand; Aartjan Beekman; Berno van Meijel
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  What if children with psychiatric problems disagree with their clinicians on the need for care? Factors explaining discordance and clinical directions.

Authors:  Richard Vijverberg; Robert Ferdinand; Aartjan Beekman; Berno van Meijel
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  Depression and suicidal behavior in adolescents: a multi-informant and multi-methods approach to diagnostic classification.

Authors:  Andrew J Lewis; Melanie D Bertino; Catherine M Bailey; Joanna Skewes; Dan I Lubman; John W Toumbourou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.