Literature DB >> 28728050

Topoisomerase expression and amplification in solid tumours: Analysis of 24,262 patients.

Gregory M Heestand1, Maria Schwaederle2, Zoran Gatalica3, David Arguello4, Razelle Kurzrock5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Topoisomerase I (TOPO1) and topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A) are specific targets of multiple chemotherapy drugs. Increased expression of TOPO1 protein and amplification of the TOP2A gene have been associated with treatment response in colorectal and breast cancers, respectively. TOPO1 and TOP2A may be potential therapeutic targets in other malignancies as well. SUMMARY OF
METHODS: We analysed TOPO1 protein expression and TOP2A gene amplification in patients (n = 24,262 specimens) with diverse cancers. Since HER2 and TOP2A co-amplification have been investigated for predictive value regarding anthracycline benefit, we analysed specimens for HER2 amplification as well.
RESULTS: Overexpressed TOPO1 protein was present in 51% of the tumours. Four percent of the tumours had TOP2A amplification, with gallbladder tumours and gastroesophageal/oesophageal tumours having rates over 10%. Overall, 4903 specimens were assessed for both TOP2A and HER2 amplification; 129 (2.6%) had co-amplification. High rates (>40%) of HER2 amplification were seen in patients with TOP2A amplification in breast, ovarian, gastroesophageal/oesophageal and pancreatic cancer.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that increased TOPO1 expression and TOP2A amplification, as well as HER2 co-alterations, are present in multiple malignancies. The implications of these observations regarding sensitivity to chemotherapy not traditionally administered to these tumour types merits investigation.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genomic profiling; HER2; Solid tumors; Topoisomerase I; Topoisomerase IIα

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28728050      PMCID: PMC5613945          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


1. Introduction

The topoisomerase family of enzymes plays a key role in unwinding coiled DNA to facilitate replication and transcription. By reversibly cleaving the DNA backbone, topoisomerase allows tension in the double helix to be released. There are two types of topoisomerase enzymes: type I enzymes cleave one of the two backbones in double-stranded DNA allowing the double helix to untwist, whereas type II enzymes cleave both DNA backbones allowing for a strand of supercoiled DNA to pass through the break before reconnecting [1,2]. Because topoisomerase enzymes regulate DNA function, they are potential targets for cancer treatment. Multiple classes of chemotherapy drugs have been developed accordingly. Camptothecin directly inhibits the activity of topoisomerase I (TOPO1) [3]. Two derivatives of camptothecin, irinotecan and topotecan are in broad clinical use. Etoposide and the anthracycline chemotherapies doxorubicin, daunorubicin, and epirubicin inhibit topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A) by blocking its ability to repair DNA strands after being cleaved [4]. The net impact is to interrupt reproduction of cancerous cells. Tumour samples can be assayed in the laboratory for TOPO1 and TOP2A protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Although the TOPO1 IHC assay has been used in multiple clinical studies [5-7], the clinical relevance of TOP2A protein expression is less clear. TOP2A protein expression does not necessarily correlate with the amplification of its encoding gene, TOP2A, though TOP2A amplification has been associated with benefit from anthracycline chemotherapy [8,9]. HER2, which encodes the HER2 tyrosine kinase critical to cell signalling and shares the long arm of chromosome 17 with TOP2A, has also been implicated in anthracycline sensitivity [10]. For patients with HER2 amplification receiving anthracyclines, co-amplification of TOP2A has been associated with improved outcomes [11-14]. HER2 can be targeted clinically by several drugs including the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, which improves survival when added to conventional chemotherapy in patients with HER2 overexpression [15,16]. In this article, we studied TOPO1 expression in 23,586 tumour samples and TOP2A amplification in 5171 tumour samples (total = 24,262 patients) with the goal of identifying cancer types that may respond to topoisomerase inhibitors. Because of the importance of HER2 in patients with TOP2A amplification, as noted above, we also studied the co-amplification of TOP2A and HER2 in 4903 specimens assayed for both the genes.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Tissue samples

Test results of consecutive tissue samples (January 2012–August 2014) of locally advanced and/or metastatic solid tumours submitted to a commercial clinical laboratory improvements amendments molecular profiling laboratory (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ) were reviewed. (Samples are interrogated based on ordering physician request). Multiplatform profiling included IHC and fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH). Since the study included only deidentified data, it was considered exempt by the UC San Diego Internal Review Board.

2.2. TOPO1 immunohistochemistry

IHC analysis was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour samples using commercially available antibodies against TOPO1 (1D6, Leica Biosystems, Germany). All slides were read by a board-certified pathologist. Slides were scored as 0+, 1+, 2+, or 3+ depending on the staining intensity, and percent tumour stained was also assigned. The predetermined threshold to determine TOPO1 overexpression was a staining intensity of 2+ or 3+ in at least 30% or more tumour cells on a given slide. All IHC assays were performed using commercially available detection kits and automated staining techniques (Benchmark XT, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ and AutostainerLink 48, Dako, Denmark).

2.3. TOP2A fluorescent in-situ hybridisation

FISH was used for evaluation of TOP2A using a commercial probe for TOP2A and the pericentromeric region of chromosome 17 (Vysis TOP2/CEP17 probe, Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL). TOP2A was determined in a minimum of 20 inter-phase tumour cell nuclei and compared with chromosome 17 centromeres in those tumour nuclei. TOP2A amplification was defined as a TOP2A/CEP17 signal ratio ≥2.0.

2.4. HER2 in-situ hybridisation (ISH)

FISH and chromogenic in-situ hybridisation (CISH) were used interchangeably to evaluate HER2 amplification. FISH was performed with a probe specific for HER2 (17q11.2-q12 region) and a probe for the pericentromeric region of chromosome 17 (Pathvysion, Abbott Molecular). Inter-phase nuclei were examined and the ratio of HER2 signals to chromosome 17 centromere signals were evaluated to indicate amplification status of this gene. A HER2/CEP17 ratio higher than 2.2 was considered amplified (ISH+); a HER2/CEP17 ratio between 1.8 and 2.2 (equivocal) and a HER2/CEP17 ratio <1.8 (negative) were both considered non-amplified (ISH−). The Pathvysion HER2 probe has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for selection of patients for trastuzumab and pertuzumab therapy. CISH was performed by using the INFORM HER2 Dual ISH DNA Probe Cocktail (Ventana Medical Systems) to determine HER2 gene status by enumeration of the ratio of the HER2 gene to chromosome 17. The HER2 and chromosome 17 probes were detected using two-colour in-situ hybridisation in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human cancer tissue specimens following staining on the BenchMark XT automated slide stainer and visualised by light microscopy. A HER2/CEP17 ratio higher than 2.0 was considered amplified (ISH+), whereas a HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0 was considered non-amplified (ISH−). The INFORM HER2 Dual ISH DNA Probe Cocktail has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for selection of patients to HER2-targeted therapies in breast cancer.

2.5. Statistical methods

Descriptive statistics was used for most analyses. JMPv11.1.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) was utilised for statistical analysis.

3. Results

3.1. TOPO1 expression

Tumour samples from 23,586 patients were stained for TOPO1 expression using IHC (Supplemental Table 1). Fifty-seven cancer subtypes were represented. TOPO1 was overexpressed in 51% of the tumours. TOPO1 over-expression was also present in >60% of the patients with each of small cell lung, gastroesophageal and oesophageal, thymic, gastric, anal, breast, prostate and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine cancers (Table 1, includes only tumours with at least 40 specimens). TOPO1 was over-expressed in 47% of the colon tumours. There were also several other tumour types in which a majority of patients expressed high levels of TOPO1, but less than 40 samples were assayed (Supplemental Table 1).
Table 1

TOPO1 overexpression by IHC in 23,586 patients with diverse malignancies.a

OverexpressedTotalPercent
Small cell lung cancer14319573.3%
Gastroesophageal and oesophageal cancers26640166.3%
Thymoma and thymic cancer355464.8%
Gastric cancer20832264.6%
Anal carcinoma6810664.2%
Invasive breast cancer1976311963.4%
Prostate cancer14122662.4%
Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumour11618762.0%
Malignant pleural mesothelioma508459.5%
Occult primary44775259.4%
Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma264557.8%
Cervical cancer22138557.4%
Osteosarcoma and dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma325657.1%
Rectal cancer18733156.5%
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma12322055.9%
Bladder cancer16429455.8%
Anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma multiforme27851454.1%
Ovarian sex-cord and stromal tumours7915052.7%
Non-small cell lung cancer1360258752.6%
Pancreatic carcinoma600115551.9%
Bladder cancer: upper genitourinary tract489451.1%
Head and neck cancer17333951.0%
Adult low-grade infiltrative astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma316150.8%
Gallbladder cancer6012050.0%
Basal cell and squamous cell cancer377847.4%
Colon cancer1067225847.3%

The 26 malignancies with the highest percentage of overexpression are represented. Overexpression is defined as 2+ by IHC and only malignancies with at least 40 patient samples are reported. See Supplemental Table 1 for full list.

3.2. TOP2A amplification

Tumour samples from 5171 patients were assayed for TOP2A amplification using FISH (Supplemental Table 1). Fifty-one cancer subtypes were represented. TOP2A amplification was present in 4.0% of the tumours. Most notably, TOP2A amplification was present in 17% of gallbladder cancers and in 12% of gastroesophageal and oesophageal cancers (Table 2). TOP2A amplification was also present in 5.0% of invasive breast cancers.
Table 2

TOP2A amplification by FISH in 5171 patients with diverse malignancies.a

Malignancy typeAmplifiedTotalPercent
Gallbladder cancer42317.4%
Gastroesophageal and oesophageal cancers86811.8%
Bladder cancer3496.1%
Invasive breast cancer12625405.0%
Epithelial ovarian cancer235104.5%
Uterine sarcoma2464.3%
Gastric cancer2504.0%
Colon cancer112774.0%
Pancreatic carcinoma82093.8%
Head and neck cancer2553.6%
Non-small cell lung cancer93142.9%
Rectal cancer1372.7%
Occult primary21012.0%
Endometrial carcinoma42321.7%
Cervical cancer1601.7%
Anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma multiforme1791.3%
Melanoma0750.0%
Carcinoid tumour0480.0%
Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumour0370.0%
Prostate cancer0360.0%

The 20 malignancies with the highest percentage of TOP2A amplification are represented. Only malignancies with at least 20 patient samples are reported. See Supplemental Table 1 for full list.

3.3. HER2 amplification and co-amplification with topoisomerase

HER2 amplification data were analysed on 10 tumour types with the highest TOP2A amplification (Fig. 1). Overall, 4903 patients were analysed for both TOP2A and HER2 and 129 (2.6%) had co-amplification. Of 202 patients with TOP2A amplification who were analysed for HER2, 129 (64%) had HER2 amplification; of 483 patients with HER2 amplification who were analysed for TOP2A amplification, 129 (27%) had TOP2A amplification (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

TOP2A and HER2 amplification by FISH/CISH*.

*Only malignancies with at least 20 patient samples are reported. Only patients who were tested for both TOP2A and HER2 amplification were included.

Fig. 2

Percent TOP2A and percent HER2 co-amplified by FISH/CISH*.

*Only malignancies with at least 5 patient samples that exhibit TOP2A amplification are reported.

Twenty-three percent of gallbladder cancers (5 of 22 patients, all tested for TOP2A and HER2) had HER2 amplification, with co-amplification of both HER2 and TOP2A in 18% (n = 4). Fifteen percent of gastro-esophageal and oesophageal cancers (10 of 65 patients, all tested for TOP2A and HER2) had HER2 amplification, with co-amplification of both HER2 and TOP2A in 7.7% (n = 5 patients). Sixty-three percent of gastroesophageal and esophageal tumours with TOP2A amplification also had HER2 amplification (5 of 8 patients), whereas 50% with HER2 amplification also had TOP2A amplification (5 of 10 patients).

4. Discussion

Topoisomerase enzymes are expressed in multiple tumour types and are potential targets for cancer treatment. To date, the most relevant to cancer care are TOPO1 and TOP2A. TOPO1 has been extensively studied in colorectal cancer—two large retrospective studies have suggested that high levels of TOPO1 are associated with increased survival when patients are treated with combination chemotherapy [5], one of which specifically associated this benefit with irinotecan-based chemotherapy [6]. Braun et al. [5] screened 1628 patients from the FOCUS trial for predictive bio-markers using archived tissue. Patients enrolled in this trial had newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer and were treated with either sequential or combination chemotherapy regimens containing fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan. Of the enrolled patients, 1313 were assessable for TOPO1 protein expression. Patients with high TOPO1 expression (>50% nuclear staining) had a median survival improvement of 5.3 months (p =0.005) when treated with combination chemotherapy upfront compared with sequential fluorouracil. There was no benefit in patients with moderate or low TOPO1 expression. Similarly, Kostopolous et al. [6] studied 498 patients who received adjuvant therapy for resected colon cancer and quantified TOPO1 protein expression from archived tumour specimens. In multivariate analysis including treatment with irinotecan, patients with high TOPO1 expression lived longer (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.42–0.88, p = 0.009). Of the elevated TOPO1 subgroup, patients treated with an irinotecan-containing regimen had improved survival (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.94, p = 0.033). The issue remains controversial, however, as other colorectal studies have not identified a survival correlation between irinotecan-containing therapy and TOPO1 expression [17]. TOP2A amplification has been similarly implicated as a biomarker for anthracycline sensitivity in breast cancer. In the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group trial 89D, 980 patients with resected breast cancer were randomised to nine cycles of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, fluorouracil (CEF) versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF). Patients with TOP2A amplification who received the anthracycline epirubicin in the CEF arm had improved relapse-free survival compared with patients with TOP2A amplification receiving CMF (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24–0.78, p =0.01) [18]. Amplification and deletion of TOP2A have both been implicated as predictive of response to anthracyclines in retrospective studies and meta-analyses [19-21]. Though TOP2A protein (the product of the TOP2A gene) can be assayed by IHC, FISH for TOP2A is the preferred diagnostic modality. In a 149 patient neoadjuvant study using single-agent epirubicin, TOP2A amplification by FISH was associated with pathological complete response (p ≤ 0.001), but not TOP2A protein expression by IHC (p ≤ 0.33) [9]. For patients with HER2 amplification receiving anthracyclines, co-amplification of TOP2A has been associated with improved outcomes [11-14]. These findings must be interpreted with caution, however, as not all studies have demonstrated a correlation between TOP2A amplification and anthracycline sensitivity [22], and at least one suggests that TOP2A gene expression may be a better biomarker than amplification [23]. As colon and breast cancers are relatively common, topoisomerase expression and its predictive value in these cancers has been extensively studied. However, the role of topoisomerase expression in other malignancies is less well known. We found that TOPO1 expression and TOP2A amplification are present in a large number of tumour types beyond colorectal and breast cancers. Most notably, 73% of small cell lung cancers and 62% of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine cancers overexpress TOPO1 (Table 1). These tumour types can be histologically similar and both are traditionally treated with cisplatin/etoposide combination chemotherapy. Based on the high percentage of patients with TOPO1 over-expression, treatment with irinotecan would be worth investigating. Indeed, several studies have evaluated irinotecan in small cell lung cancer, both as a single-agent and as part of a platinum doublet. As a single-agent, irinotecan has a reported response rate of 47% in patients with relapsed or refractory disease [24]. A phase III study randomising 154 newly diagnosed extensive-stage patients with small cell lung cancer to cisplatin/irinotecan versus cisplatin/etoposide was stopped early due to a median survival improvement of 12.8 versus 9.4 months favouring the irinotecan arm (p = 0.002) [25]. In patients with gastroesophageal and oesophageal cancers, the incidence of TOPO1 overexpression is 66% and TOP2A amplification is 12%. Fluorouracil/irinotecan is already routinely used as a first-line regimen in patients with advanced disease, with a reported median survival of 9.0 months [26]. For fit patients with advanced disease, the combination of epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine offers a median survival of 11.2 months [27]. TOP2A was amplified in 17% of the patients with gallbladder cancer, suggesting that there may be a role for anthracycline chemotherapy or etoposide in this disease. The current standard of care for advanced gallbladder cancer is gemcitabine/cisplatin with a response rate of 38% [28], and there are data supporting the use of regimens-containing fluorouracil and oxaliplatin as well [29]. Two small studies added epirubicin to cisplatin/fluorouracil and cisplatin/capecitabine backbones and reported response rates of 19% and 40% respectively in patients with advanced biliary cancers including gallbladder cancer [30,31]. Epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine combination may be a reasonable alternative to study in patients with TOP2A amplification. Considering that all gallbladder cancer patients with TOP2A amplification reported in this study also have HER2 co-amplification (albeit with only a small number of patients positive for TOP2A amplification that were tested for HER2 amplification; n = 4), it would be tempting to add trastuzumab to this regimen as well. However, combining trastuzumab and an anthracycline is not routinely recommended due to the risk of cardiotoxicity. Sixty-four percent of patients with TOP2A amplification also had HER2 co-amplification (129 of 202 patients). This may be due to the location of both genes on chromosome 17, though only 27% of the patients with HER2 amplification also had TOP2A co-amplification (129 of 483 patients). As HER2 can be targeted with trastuzumab, it may be reasonable to test patients with TOP2A amplification reflexively for HER2 amplification to identify additional treatment options [32]. Of course, the number of patients with co-amplification is small, and larger subsets would be needed to confirm the frequency of the co-amplification phenomenon. There are several limitations to this study. While the overall number of patients is very large, in some cancers, there were small or variable numbers of patients. In the TOPO1 IHC data set, the number of patient samples per tumour type ranged from five samples to 4703 samples. In the TOP2A FISH data set, the number of samples per tumour type ranged from one sample to 2540 samples. Only TOP2A amplification was characterised, not TOP2A deletion, and TOP2A amplification results could be affected if HER2 overlapped on the same amplicon. Six tumour types included in the TOPO1 IHC data set did not have specimens available for the TOP2A FISH assay. For tables included in this article, we displayed only tumour types with at least 40 (Table 1) or 20 patients (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Due to a lack of a standard methodology and threshold, discrepant results were found between our results and other publications. Further studies including annotated data for clinical correlations could not be performed because pertinent clinicopathologic information was unavailable. In summary, increased TOPO1 expression and TOP2A amplification are present in multiple malignancies. Although chemotherapeutic agents are often distinguished from “targeted” agents and are generally given to patients without biomarker selection, it is plausible that TOPO1 and TOP2A should be further investigated for their capacity to predict response. It is also reasonable to ask if the presence of these high expression or amplification levels correlate with sensitivity to chemotherapy not traditionally associated with specific tumour types. Further investigation is warranted.
  32 in total

1.  Alterations in the TOP2A and HER2 genes: association with adjuvant anthracycline sensitivity in human breast cancers.

Authors:  Dennis J Slamon; Michael F Press
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification predicts favorable treatment response to tailored and dose-escalated anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy in HER-2/neu-amplified breast cancer: Scandinavian Breast Group Trial 9401.

Authors:  Minna Tanner; Jorma Isola; Tom Wiklund; Björn Erikstein; Pirkko Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Per Malmström; Nils Wilking; Jonas Nilsson; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  retrospective analysis of topoisomerase IIa amplifications and deletions as predictive markers in primary breast cancer patients randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

Authors:  Ann S Knoop; Helle Knudsen; Eva Balslev; Birgitte B Rasmussen; Jens Overgaard; Kirsten V Nielsen; Andreas Schonau; Katrín Gunnarsdóttir; Karen E Olsen; Henning Mouridsen; Bent Ejlertsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  HER2 aberrations in cancer: implications for therapy.

Authors:  Min Yan; Barbara A Parker; Richard Schwab; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Topoisomerase-I, thymidylate synthase primary tumour expression and clinical efficacy of 5-FU/CPT-11 chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Angelo Paradiso; JanMing Xu; Anita Mangia; Annalisa Chiriatti; Gianni Simone; Alfredo Zito; Severino Montemurro; Francesco Giuliani; Evaristo Maiello; Giuseppe Colucci
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  CPT-11: a new derivative of camptothecin for the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  N Masuda; M Fukuoka; Y Kusunoki; K Matsui; N Takifuji; S Kudoh; S Negoro; M Nishioka; K Nakagawa; M Takada
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; Naureen Starling; Sheela Rao; Timothy Iveson; Marianne Nicolson; Fareeda Coxon; Gary Middleton; Francis Daniel; Jacqueline Oates; Andrew Richard Norman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Predictive biomarkers of chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer: results from the UK MRC FOCUS trial.

Authors:  Michael S Braun; Susan D Richman; Philip Quirke; Catherine Daly; Julian W Adlard; Faye Elliott; Jennifer H Barrett; Peter Selby; Angela M Meade; Richard J Stephens; Mahesh K B Parmar; Matthew T Seymour
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Camptothecin induces protein-linked DNA breaks via mammalian DNA topoisomerase I.

Authors:  Y H Hsiang; R Hertzberg; S Hecht; L F Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  24 in total

1.  Racial Disparities in the Molecular Landscape of Cancer.

Authors:  Elisabeth I Heath; Filipa Lynce; Joanne Xiu; Angela Ellerbrock; Sandeep K Reddy; Elias Obeid; Stephen V Liu; Aliccia Bollig-Fischer; Duska Separovic; Ari Vanderwalde
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Over-expression of TOP2A as a prognostic biomarker in patients with glioma.

Authors:  Tianmin Zhou; Yan Wang; Dongmeng Qian; Qing Liang; Bin Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  Downregulation of topoisomerase 1 and 2 with acriflavine sensitizes bladder cancer cells to cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Parisa Zargar; Shabnaz Koochakkhani; Marziyeh Hassanzadeh; Yaghoub Ashouri Taziani; Hamid Nasrollahi; Ebrahim Eftekhar
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  TOP1 CAD-seq: A protocol to map catalytically engaged topoisomerase 1 in human cells.

Authors:  Vladislav Kuzin; Anika Wiegard; Donald P Cameron; Laura Baranello
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2022-08-01

5.  Game-theoretic link relevance indexing on genome-wide expression dataset identifies putative salient genes with potential etiological and diapeutics role in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Vishwa Jyoti Baruah; Papori Neog Bora; Bhaswati Sarmah; Priyakshi Mahanta; Ankumon Sarmah; Stefano Moretti; Rajnish Kumar; Surajit Borkotokey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  GNAS, GNAQ, and GNA11 alterations in patients with diverse cancers.

Authors:  Austin J Parish; Vi Nguyen; Aaron M Goodman; Karthikeyan Murugesan; Garrett M Frampton; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A study of deregulated MMR pathways and anticancer potential of curcuma derivatives using computational approach.

Authors:  Priyanjali Bhattacharya; Trupti N Patel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Array expression meta-analysis of cancer stem cell genes identifies upregulation of PODXL especially in DCC low expression meningiomas.

Authors:  Hans-Juergen Schulten; Deema Hussein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of the biomarkers for targeted therapies in primary extra-mammary and mammary Paget's disease.

Authors:  Zoran Gatalica; Semir Vranic; Božo Krušlin; Kelsey Poorman; Phillip Stafford; Denisa Kacerovska; Wijendra Senarathne; Elena Florento; Elma Contreras; Alexandra Leary; April Choi; Gino K In
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Implications of Topoisomerase (TOP1 and TOP2α) Expression in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Misato Ogino; Takaaki Fujii; Yuko Nakazawa; Toru Higuchi; Yukio Koibuchi; Tetsunari Oyama; Jun Horiguchi; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.