PURPOSE: Amplification of the HER-2/neu and topoisomerase IIalpha (TOP2A) genes has been linked to the effects of anthracyclines. Their role in predicting the outcome of anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients has remained controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present substudy of the Scandinavian Breast Group trial 9401, in which an epirubicin-based regimen (nine courses of tailored and dose-escalated fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide [FEC]) was compared with three or four courses of standard FEC followed by bone marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin), included high-risk breast cancer patients (with eight or more positive axillary lymph nodes or at least five nodes with additional poor prognostic indicators). Amplification of HER-2/neu was determined retrospectively in paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections by chromogenic in situ hybridization. TOP2A was tested only in HER-2/neu-amplified tumors. RESULTS: HER-2/neu amplification alone, which was present in 32.7% of the tumors, was a strong prognostic factor for short relapse-free (P = .0034) and overall survival (P = .0008) but showed no direct association with treatment assignment. TOP2A coamplification, which was present in 37% of HER-2/neu-amplified tumors, was associated with better relapse-free survival in patients treated with tailored and dose-escalated FEC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45; P = .049). A statistical multivariate Cox's regression analysis confirmed the predictive significance of TOP2A coamplification (HR = 0.30; P = .020) in HER-2/neu-amplified tumors. There was no such association in patients with HER-2/neu-amplified tumors without TOP2A gene amplification. CONCLUSION: Coamplification of HER-2/neu and TOP2A may define a subgroup of high-risk breast cancer patients who benefit from individually tailored and dose-escalated adjuvant anthracyclines.
PURPOSE: Amplification of the HER-2/neu and topoisomerase IIalpha (TOP2A) genes has been linked to the effects of anthracyclines. Their role in predicting the outcome of anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancerpatients has remained controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present substudy of the Scandinavian Breast Group trial 9401, in which an epirubicin-based regimen (nine courses of tailored and dose-escalated fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide [FEC]) was compared with three or four courses of standard FEC followed by bone marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin), included high-risk breast cancerpatients (with eight or more positive axillary lymph nodes or at least five nodes with additional poor prognostic indicators). Amplification of HER-2/neu was determined retrospectively in paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections by chromogenic in situ hybridization. TOP2A was tested only in HER-2/neu-amplified tumors. RESULTS:HER-2/neu amplification alone, which was present in 32.7% of the tumors, was a strong prognostic factor for short relapse-free (P = .0034) and overall survival (P = .0008) but showed no direct association with treatment assignment. TOP2A coamplification, which was present in 37% of HER-2/neu-amplified tumors, was associated with better relapse-free survival in patients treated with tailored and dose-escalated FEC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45; P = .049). A statistical multivariate Cox's regression analysis confirmed the predictive significance of TOP2A coamplification (HR = 0.30; P = .020) in HER-2/neu-amplified tumors. There was no such association in patients with HER-2/neu-amplified tumors without TOP2A gene amplification. CONCLUSION: Coamplification of HER-2/neu and TOP2A may define a subgroup of high-risk breast cancerpatients who benefit from individually tailored and dose-escalated adjuvant anthracyclines.
Authors: Rebecca J Leary; Jimmy C Lin; Jordan Cummins; Simina Boca; Laura D Wood; D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Tobias Sjöblom; Ben-Ho Park; Ramon Parsons; Joseph Willis; Dawn Dawson; James K V Willson; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Levy Kopelovich; Nick Papadopoulos; Len A Pennacchio; Tian-Li Wang; Sanford D Markowitz; Giovanni Parmigiani; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-10-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G Metro; Z Zheng; A Fabi; M Schell; B Antoniani; M Mottolese; A N Monteiro; P Vici; S Lara Rivera; D Boulware; F Cognetti; G Bepler Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Christian Schindlbeck; D Mayr; C Olivier; B Rack; V Engelstaedter; J Jueckstock; C Jenderek; U Andergassen; U Jeschke; K Friese Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Emelyne Dejeux; Jo Anders Rønneberg; Hiroko Solvang; Ida Bukholm; Stephanie Geisler; Turid Aas; Ivo G Gut; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Per Eystein Lønning; Vessela N Kristensen; Jörg Tost Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: Catherine Oakman; Silvia Bessi; Elena Zafarana; Francesca Galardi; Laura Biganzoli; Angelo Di Leo Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2009-04-03 Impact factor: 6.466