Literature DB >> 18509181

Predictive biomarkers of chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer: results from the UK MRC FOCUS trial.

Michael S Braun1, Susan D Richman, Philip Quirke, Catherine Daly, Julian W Adlard, Faye Elliott, Jennifer H Barrett, Peter Selby, Angela M Meade, Richard J Stephens, Mahesh K B Parmar, Matthew T Seymour.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Candidate predictive biomarkers for irinotecan and oxaliplatin were assessed in 1,628 patients in Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, CPT-11: Use and Sequencing (FOCUS), a large randomized trial of fluorouracil alone compared with fluorouracil and irinotecan and compared with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer.
METHODS: The candidate biomarkers were: tumor immunohistochemistry for MLH1/MSH2, p53, topoisomerase-1 (Topo1), excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1), O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltranserase (MGMT), and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2); germline DNA polymorphisms in GSTP1, ABCB1, XRCC1, ERCC2, and UGT1A1. These were screened in more than 750 patients for interaction with benefit from irinotecan or oxaliplatin; two markers (Topo1 and MLH1/MSH2) met criteria to be taken forward for analysis in the full population. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.
RESULTS: One thousand three hundred thirteen patients (81%) were assessable for Topo1 immunohistochemistry (low, < 10%; moderate, 10% to 50%; or high, > 50% tumor nuclei). In patients with low Topo1, PFS was not improved by the addition of either irinotecan (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.22) or oxaliplatin (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.07); conversely, patients with moderate/high Topo1 benefited from the addition of either drug (HR, 0.48 to 0.70 in all categories; interaction P = .005; overall, P = .001 for irinotecan; P = .05 for oxaliplatin). High Topo1 was associated with a major overall survival benefit with first-line combination chemotherapy (HR, 0.60; median benefit, 5.3 months); patients with moderate or low Topo1 did not benefit (HR, 0.92 and 1.09, respectively; interaction P = .005). MLH1/MSH2 did not show significant interaction with treatment, although the low rate of loss (4.4%) limits the power of the study for this biomarker.
CONCLUSION: Topo1 immunohistochemistry identified subpopulations that did or did not benefit from irinotecan, and possibly also from oxaliplatin. If verified independently, this information will contribute to the individualization of treatment for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18509181     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.5580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  109 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice.

Authors:  Colin C Pritchard; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Development of a validated immunofluorescence assay for γH2AX as a pharmacodynamic marker of topoisomerase I inhibitor activity.

Authors:  Robert J Kinders; Melinda Hollingshead; Scott Lawrence; Jiuping Ji; Brian Tabb; William M Bonner; Yves Pommier; Larry Rubinstein; Yvonne A Evrard; Ralph E Parchment; Joseph Tomaszewski; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  B Markman; V Rodríguez-Freixinos; J Tabernero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Establishment of a predictive genetic model for estimating chemotherapy sensitivity of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis.

Authors:  Xingrong Lu; Jie Pan; Shaotang Li; Songfei Shen; Pan Chi; Huiming Lin; Ying Huang; Zhongbin Xu; Shenghui Huang
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.099

5.  Accomplishments in 2008 in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Goldberg; Neal J Meropol; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09

6.  The value of XPD and XRCC1 genotype polymorphisms to predict clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients with irinotecan-based regimens.

Authors:  Mehmet Artac; Hakan Bozcuk; Sacide Pehlivan; Songül Akcan; Mustafa Pehlivan; Tugce Sever; Mustafa Ozdogan; Burhan Savas
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Clinical and pharmacologic evaluation of two dosing schedules of indotecan (LMP400), a novel indenoisoquinoline, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Shivaani Kummar; Alice Chen; Martin Gutierrez; Thomas D Pfister; Lihua Wang; Christophe Redon; William M Bonner; William Yutzy; Yiping Zhang; Robert J Kinders; Jiuping Ji; Deborah Allen; Joseph M Covey; Julie L Eiseman; Julianne L Holleran; Jan H Beumer; Larry Rubinstein; Jerry Collins; Joseph Tomaszewski; Ralph Parchment; Yves Pommier; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  Molecular alterations and biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  William M Grady; Colin C Pritchard
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 9.  [Molecular targets for colon cancer. VEGF, EGFR - and what else?].

Authors:  C Röcken
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 10.  [Pathological diagnosis for individualized therapy of colorectal cancer].

Authors:  T Kirchner; A Jung
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.