BACKGROUND: There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to comparecisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here. METHODS: We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive eithercisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to compare cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here. METHODS: We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive either cisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: Elad Sharon; Jingli Zhang; Kevin Hollevoet; Seth M Steinberg; Ira Pastan; Masanori Onda; Jochen Gaedcke; B Michael Ghadimi; Thomas Ried; Raffit Hassan Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.694
Authors: Sam J Lubner; Michelle R Mahoney; Jill L Kolesar; Noelle K Loconte; George P Kim; Henry C Pitot; Philip A Philip; Joel Picus; Wei-Peng Yong; Lisa Horvath; Guy Van Hazel; Charles E Erlichman; Kyle D Holen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vanessa da Costa Miranda; Maria Ignez Braghiroli; Luiza Dib Batista Bugiato Faria; Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira; Jorge Sabbaga; Paulo M Hoff; Rachel P Riechelmann Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2014-03
Authors: Jimme K Wiggers; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Robert J Coelen; Erik A Rauws; Mark A Schattner; C Yung Nio; Karen T Brown; Mithat Gonen; Susan van Dieren; Krijn P van Lienden; Peter J Allen; Marc G H Besselink; Olivier R C Busch; Michael I D'Angelica; Robert P DeMatteo; Dirk J Gouma; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 10.093