Axel Schmermund1, Mohamed Marwan2, Jörg Hausleiter3, Sebastian Barth4, Oliver Bruder5, Sebastian Kerber4, Grigorius Korosoglou6,7, Alexander Leber8, Werner Moshage9, Stephen Schröder10, Steffen Schneider11, Jochen Senges11, Stephan Achenbach2. 1. Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, CCB, Im Prüfling 23, 60389, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany. a.schmermund@ccb.de. 2. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. 3. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany. 4. Herz- und Gefäß-Klinik, Rhön-Klinikum Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Bad Neustadt an Der Saale, Germany. 5. Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Contilia Herz- und Gefäßzentrum, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Essen, Essen, Germany. 6. Medizinische Klinik (Krehl-Klinik) und Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie (Innere Medizin III), Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 7. Kardiologie und Angiologie, GRN-Klinik Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany. 8. Isar Herz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany. 9. Kardiologie Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Germany. 10. Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie mit Schlaganfallstation, Internistische Sportmedizin, Alb Fils Klinik am Eichert, Göppingen, Germany. 11. Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is increasingly used as a test to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with a low to intermediate pre-test probability of the disease. We used the database of the German CT registry, collected between 2009 and 2014 in a broad patient population, to analyze contemporary radiation dose associated with coronary CTA in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prospective observational registry included a total of 7061 patients ≥18 years, referred to 12 participating centers for a clinically indicated cardiac CT examination. All centers were cardiology units well experienced in CTA and used multi-slice CT scanners with at least 64 rows. Coronary CTA was performed in a subset of 5001 patients, 59.6 ± 11.8 years, body mass index (BMI) 26.9 ± 4.5 kg/m2, 38% females. Three time periods with approximately equal numbers of patients were created (01/09-03/10, 04/10-03/11, 04/11-07/14). The dose-length product of all examinations and derived effective dose in mSv (conversion factor k = 0.014) as well as the influence of patient characteristics on dose were compared for the three time periods. RESULTS: BMI and proportion of female patients remained stable over time, and mean heart rate decreased from 60.3 ± 9.0 to 58.5 ± 9.3 bpm from the first to the last time period (p < 0.001). Overall, the mean effective dose of coronary CTA was 3.6 mSv (Q1 1.8 mSv, Q3 7.4 mSv). Within the three time periods, it declined from 5.6 (2.7, 8.6) mSv during the first to 4.8 (2.1, 8.2) mSv during the second and 2.5 (1.3, 4.6) mSv during the last time period (p < 0.001). Paralleling the decline in radiation dose over time, the proportion of prospectively ECG-triggered examinations increased (68, 79, 83%; p < 0.001), and the proportion of examinations with retrospective gating and no tube current modulation decreased (5.3, 4.0, 1.6%; p < 0.001). Tube current (mAs) and voltage (kV) both decreased over time. In multivariable analysis, besides earlier time period, further independent predictors of an increased radiation dose were older age, higher heart rate, and higher BMI as well as the technical factors higher mAs, higher kV, and retrospective gating. At three sites, CT scanners with improved technology were installed during the last time period. CONCLUSIONS: In current clinical practice among German cardiology units with specific expertise in cross-sectional cardiovascular imaging, overall radiation dose of coronary CTA was comparably low. Over time, a decline in radiation dose was demonstrated, probably due to a combination of improvements in data acquisition protocols and patient preparation as well as installation of new CT scanners with advanced technology.
BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is increasingly used as a test to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with a low to intermediate pre-test probability of the disease. We used the database of the German CT registry, collected between 2009 and 2014 in a broad patient population, to analyze contemporary radiation dose associated with coronary CTA in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prospective observational registry included a total of 7061 patients ≥18 years, referred to 12 participating centers for a clinically indicated cardiac CT examination. All centers were cardiology units well experienced in CTA and used multi-slice CT scanners with at least 64 rows. Coronary CTA was performed in a subset of 5001 patients, 59.6 ± 11.8 years, body mass index (BMI) 26.9 ± 4.5 kg/m2, 38% females. Three time periods with approximately equal numbers of patients were created (01/09-03/10, 04/10-03/11, 04/11-07/14). The dose-length product of all examinations and derived effective dose in mSv (conversion factor k = 0.014) as well as the influence of patient characteristics on dose were compared for the three time periods. RESULTS: BMI and proportion of female patients remained stable over time, and mean heart rate decreased from 60.3 ± 9.0 to 58.5 ± 9.3 bpm from the first to the last time period (p < 0.001). Overall, the mean effective dose of coronary CTA was 3.6 mSv (Q1 1.8 mSv, Q3 7.4 mSv). Within the three time periods, it declined from 5.6 (2.7, 8.6) mSv during the first to 4.8 (2.1, 8.2) mSv during the second and 2.5 (1.3, 4.6) mSv during the last time period (p < 0.001). Paralleling the decline in radiation dose over time, the proportion of prospectively ECG-triggered examinations increased (68, 79, 83%; p < 0.001), and the proportion of examinations with retrospective gating and no tube current modulation decreased (5.3, 4.0, 1.6%; p < 0.001). Tube current (mAs) and voltage (kV) both decreased over time. In multivariable analysis, besides earlier time period, further independent predictors of an increased radiation dose were older age, higher heart rate, and higher BMI as well as the technical factors higher mAs, higher kV, and retrospective gating. At three sites, CT scanners with improved technology were installed during the last time period. CONCLUSIONS: In current clinical practice among German cardiology units with specific expertise in cross-sectional cardiovascular imaging, overall radiation dose of coronary CTA was comparably low. Over time, a decline in radiation dose was demonstrated, probably due to a combination of improvements in data acquisition protocols and patient preparation as well as installation of new CT scanners with advanced technology.
Authors: Gilles Montalescot; Udo Sechtem; Stephan Achenbach; Felicita Andreotti; Chris Arden; Andrzej Budaj; Raffaele Bugiardini; Filippo Crea; Thomas Cuisset; Carlo Di Mario; J Rafael Ferreira; Bernard J Gersh; Anselm K Gitt; Jean-Sebastien Hulot; Nikolaus Marx; Lionel H Opie; Matthias Pfisterer; Eva Prescott; Frank Ruschitzka; Manel Sabaté; Roxy Senior; David Paul Taggart; Ernst E van der Wall; Christiaan J M Vrints; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Juhani Knuuti; Marco Valgimigli; Héctor Bueno; Marc J Claeys; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Cetin Erol; Herbert Frank; Christian Funck-Brentano; Oliver Gaemperli; José R Gonzalez-Juanatey; Michalis Hamilos; David Hasdai; Steen Husted; Stefan K James; Kari Kervinen; Philippe Kolh; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Massimo F Piepoli; Axel R Pries; Francesco Romeo; Lars Rydén; Maarten L Simoons; Per Anton Sirnes; Ph Gabriel Steg; Adam Timmis; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Aylin Yildirir; Jose Luis Zamorano Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Andrew J Einstein; Kevin W Moser; Randall C Thompson; Manuel D Cerqueira; Milena J Henzlova Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michaela M Hell; Daniel Bittner; Annika Schuhbaeck; Gerd Muschiol; Michael Brand; Michael Lell; Michael Uder; Stephan Achenbach; Mohamed Marwan Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2014-09-16
Authors: Maksymilian P Opolski; Won-Keun Kim; Christoph Liebetrau; Claudia Walther; Johannes Blumenstein; Luise Gaede; Jörg Kempfert; Arnaud Van Linden; Thomas Walther; Christian W Hamm; Helge Möllmann Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Massimo F Piepoli; Arno W Hoes; Stefan Agewall; Christian Albus; Carlos Brotons; Alberico L Catapano; Marie-Therese Cooney; Ugo Corrà; Bernard Cosyns; Christi Deaton; Ian Graham; Michael Stephen Hall; F D Richard Hobbs; Maja-Lisa Løchen; Herbert Löllgen; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Joep Perk; Eva Prescott; Josep Redon; Dimitrios J Richter; Naveed Sattar; Yvo Smulders; Monica Tiberi; H Bart van der Worp; Ineke van Dis; W M Monique Verschuren; Simone Binno Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Elisabeth Arnoldi; Thorsten R Johnson; Carsten Rist; Bernd J Wintersperger; Wieland H Sommer; Alexander Becker; Christoph R Becker; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Yiming Gao; Usman Mahmood; Tianyu Liu; Brian Quinn; Marc J Gollub; X George Xu; Lawrence T Dauer Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Axel Schmermund; Joachim Eckert; Marco Schmidt; Annett Magedanz; Thomas Voigtländer Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Renate B Schnabel; Stephan Camen; Fabian Knebel; Andreas Hagendorff; Udo Bavendiek; Michael Böhm; Wolfram Doehner; Matthias Endres; Klaus Gröschel; Andreas Goette; Hagen B Huttner; Christoph Jensen; Paulus Kirchhof; Grigorios Korosoglou; Ulrich Laufs; Jan Liman; Caroline Morbach; Darius Günther Nabavi; Tobias Neumann-Haefelin; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Sven Poli; Timolaos Rizos; Andreas Rolf; Joachim Röther; Wolf Rüdiger Schäbitz; Thorsten Steiner; Götz Thomalla; Rolf Wachter; Karl Georg Haeusler Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 5.460