L W Poll1, M Cohnen, S Brachten, K Ewen, U Mödder. 1. Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf (UKD), Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany. polll@uni-duesseldorf.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of ECG-controlled tube current modulation on radiation exposure in retrospectively-ECG-gated multislice CT (MSCT) of the heart. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different cardiac MSCT protocols with different slice collimation (4 x 1, and 4 x 2.5mm), and a pitch-factor of 1.5 and 1.8 were investigated at a multi-slice CT scanner Somatom Volume Zoom, Siemens. An anthropomorphic Alderson-Rando phantom was equipped with LiF-thermoluminescence dosimeters at several organ sites, and effective doses were calculated using ICRP-weighting factors. Scan protocols were performed with ECG-controlled tube current modulation ("ECG pulsing") at two different heart rates (60 and 80 bpm). These data were compared to previous data from MSCT of the heart without use of "ECG pulsing". RESULTS: Radiation exposure with (60 bpm) and without tube current modulation using a 2.5 mm collimation was 1.8 mSv and 2.9 mSv for females, and 1.5 mSv and 2.4 mSv for males, respectively. For protocols using a 1 mm collimation with a pitch-factor of 1.5 (1.8), radiation exposure with and without tube current modulation was 5.6 (6.3) mSv and 9.5 (11.2) mSv for females, and 4.6 (5.2) mSv and 7.7 (9.2) mSv for males, respectively. At higher heart rates (80 bpm) radiation exposure is increased from 1.5 - 1.8 mSv to 1.8 - 2.1 mSv, using the 2.5 mm collimation, and from 4.6 - 5.6 mSv to 5.9 - 7.2 mSv, for protocols using 1 mm collimation. CONCLUSIONS: The ECG-controlled tube current modulation allows a dose reduction of 37 % to 44 % when retrospectively ECG-gated MSCT of the heart is performed. The tube current - as a function over time - and therefore the radiation exposure is dependent on the heart rate.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of ECG-controlled tube current modulation on radiation exposure in retrospectively-ECG-gated multislice CT (MSCT) of the heart. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different cardiac MSCT protocols with different slice collimation (4 x 1, and 4 x 2.5mm), and a pitch-factor of 1.5 and 1.8 were investigated at a multi-slice CT scanner Somatom Volume Zoom, Siemens. An anthropomorphic Alderson-Rando phantom was equipped with LiF-thermoluminescence dosimeters at several organ sites, and effective doses were calculated using ICRP-weighting factors. Scan protocols were performed with ECG-controlled tube current modulation ("ECG pulsing") at two different heart rates (60 and 80 bpm). These data were compared to previous data from MSCT of the heart without use of "ECG pulsing". RESULTS: Radiation exposure with (60 bpm) and without tube current modulation using a 2.5 mm collimation was 1.8 mSv and 2.9 mSv for females, and 1.5 mSv and 2.4 mSv for males, respectively. For protocols using a 1 mm collimation with a pitch-factor of 1.5 (1.8), radiation exposure with and without tube current modulation was 5.6 (6.3) mSv and 9.5 (11.2) mSv for females, and 4.6 (5.2) mSv and 7.7 (9.2) mSv for males, respectively. At higher heart rates (80 bpm) radiation exposure is increased from 1.5 - 1.8 mSv to 1.8 - 2.1 mSv, using the 2.5 mm collimation, and from 4.6 - 5.6 mSv to 5.9 - 7.2 mSv, for protocols using 1 mm collimation. CONCLUSIONS: The ECG-controlled tube current modulation allows a dose reduction of 37 % to 44 % when retrospectively ECG-gated MSCT of the heart is performed. The tube current - as a function over time - and therefore the radiation exposure is dependent on the heart rate.
Authors: Andrew J Einstein; Carl D Elliston; Daniel W Groves; Bin Cheng; Steven D Wolff; Gregory D N Pearson; M Robert Peters; Lynne L Johnson; Sabahat Bokhari; Gary W Johnson; Ketan Bhatia; Theodore Pozniakoff; David J Brenner Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; Margaret Ackerman; Christoph R Becker; Pawel E Buszman; Pim J de Feyter; Udo Hoffmann; Matthew T Keadey; Riccardo Marano; Martin J Lipton; Gilbert L Raff; Gautham P Reddy; Michael R Rees; Geoffrey D Rubin; U Joseph Schoepf; Giuseppe Tarulli; Edwin J R van Beek; Lewis Wexler; Charles S White Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-06-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Dominik Ketelsen; Marie H Luetkhoff; Christoph Thomas; Matthias Werner; Markus Buchgeister; Ilias Tsiflikas; Anja Reimann; Christof Burgstahler; Andreas F Kopp; Claus D Claussen; Martin Heuschmid Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Axel Schmermund; Mohamed Marwan; Jörg Hausleiter; Sebastian Barth; Oliver Bruder; Sebastian Kerber; Grigorius Korosoglou; Alexander Leber; Werner Moshage; Stephen Schröder; Steffen Schneider; Jochen Senges; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 5.460