Literature DB >> 28715990

Single-Subject Studies in Translational Nutrition Research.

Nicholas J Schork1,2,3, Laura H Goetz2,4,5.   

Abstract

There is a great deal of interest in personalized, individualized, or precision interventions for disease and health-risk mitigation. This is as true of nutrition-based intervention and prevention strategies as it is for pharmacotherapies and pharmaceutical-oriented prevention strategies. Essentially, technological breakthroughs have enabled researchers to probe an individual's unique genetic, biochemical, physiological, behavioral, and exposure profile, allowing them to identify very specific and often nuanced factors that an individual might possess, which may make it more or less likely that he or she responds favorably to a particular intervention (e.g., nutrient supplementation) or disease prevention strategy (e.g., specific diet). However, as compelling and intuitive as personalized nutrition might be in the current era in which data-intensive biomedical characterization of individuals is possible, appropriately and objectively vetting personalized nutrition strategies is not trivial and requires novel study designs and data analytical methods. These designs and methods must consider a very integrated use of the multiple contemporary biomedical assays and technologies that motivate them, which adds to their complexity. Single-subject or N-of-1 trials can be used to assess the utility of personalized interventions and, in addition, can be crafted in such a way as to accommodate the necessarily integrated use of many emerging biomedical technologies and assays. In this review, we consider the motivation, design, and implementation of N-of-1 trials in translational nutrition research that are meant to assess the utility of personalized nutritional strategies. We provide a number of example studies, discuss appropriate analytical methods given the complex data they generate and require, and consider how such studies could leverage integration of various biomarker assays and clinical end points. Importantly, we also consider the development of strategies and algorithms for matching nutritional needs to individual biomedical profiles and the issues surrounding them. Finally, we discuss the limitations of personalized nutrition studies, possible extensions of N-of-1 nutritional intervention studies, and areas of future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; genetic profiling; nutrigenomics; personalized nutrition; prediction modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28715990      PMCID: PMC6383767          DOI: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr        ISSN: 0199-9885            Impact factor:   11.848


  101 in total

1.  The self-controlled and self-recorded clinical trial for low-grade morbidity.

Authors:  L HOGBEN; M SIM
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1953-10

2.  Low intake of calcium, folate, nicotinic acid, vitamin E, retinol, beta-carotene and high intake of pantothenic acid, biotin and riboflavin are significantly associated with increased genome instability--results from a dietary intake and micronucleus index survey in South Australia.

Authors:  Michael Fenech; Peter Baghurst; Wayne Luderer; Julie Turner; Sally Record; Marcello Ceppi; Stefano Bonassi
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  Nutrigenomics and personalized nutrition: science and concept.

Authors:  Martin Kussmann; Laurent B Fay
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 4.  Adaptive treatment assignment methods and clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Discovery-based nutritional systems biology: developing N-of-1 nutrigenomic research.

Authors:  Jim Kaput; Melissa Morine
Journal:  Int J Vitam Nutr Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.784

6.  A high-fat diet differentially regulates glutathione phenotypes in the obesity-prone mouse strains DBA/2J, C57BL/6J, and AKR/J.

Authors:  Katie M Norris; Whitney Okie; Woo Kyun Kim; Roshan Adhikari; Sarah Yoo; Stephanie King; Robert Pazdro
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Physician nutrition and cognition during work hours: effect of a nutrition based intervention.

Authors:  Jane B Lemaire; Jean E Wallace; Kelly Dinsmore; Adriane M Lewin; William A Ghali; Delia Roberts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. II. Review of 93 intervention studies.

Authors:  Gary Williamson; Claudine Manach
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 9.  Single-patient (n-of-1) trials: a pragmatic clinical decision methodology for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Naihua Duan; Richard L Kravitz; Christopher H Schmid
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Host lifestyle affects human microbiota on daily timescales.

Authors:  Lawrence A David; Arne C Materna; Jonathan Friedman; Maria I Campos-Baptista; Matthew C Blackburn; Allison Perrotta; Susan E Erdman; Eric J Alm
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  22 in total

1.  More Nutrition Precision, Better Decisions for the Health of Our Nation.

Authors:  Patrick J Stover; Janet C King
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2019

3.  What is Evidence-Based Functional Medicine in the 21st Century?

Authors:  Jeffrey S Bland
Journal:  Integr Med (Encinitas)       Date:  2019-06

4.  Barriers and Research Priorities for Implementing Precision Medicine.

Authors:  David C Whitcomb
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Accelerating the Drug Delivery Pipeline for Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: Summary of the Working Group on Drug Development and Trials in Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Authors:  Mark E Lowe; Marc T Goodman; Gregory A Coté; Marshall J Glesby; Mark Haupt; Nicholas J Schork; Vikesh K Singh; Dana K Andersen; Stephen J Pandol; Aliye Uc; David C Whitcomb
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Valuing the Diversity of Research Methods to Advance Nutrition Science.

Authors:  Richard D Mattes; Sylvia B Rowe; Sarah D Ohlhorst; Andrew W Brown; Daniel J Hoffman; DeAnn J Liska; Edith J M Feskens; Jaapna Dhillon; Katherine L Tucker; Leonard H Epstein; Lynnette M Neufeld; Michael Kelley; Naomi K Fukagawa; Roger A Sunde; Steven H Zeisel; Anthony J Basile; Laura E Borth; Emahlea Jackson
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.567

Review 7.  Perspective: Application of N-of-1 Methods in Personalized Nutrition Research.

Authors:  Tilly Potter; Rute Vieira; Baukje de Roos
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.701

8.  Does Modulation of an Epigenetic Clock Define a Geroprotector?

Authors:  Nicholas J Schork; Brett Beaulieu-Jones; Winnie Liang; Susan Smalley; Laura H Goetz
Journal:  Adv Geriatr Med Res       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 9.  Personalised Interventions-A Precision Approach for the Next Generation of Dietary Intervention Studies.

Authors:  Baukje de Roos; Lorraine Brennan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Precision medicine for pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  Celeste A Shelton; David C Whitcomb
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.