Celeste A Shelton1, David C Whitcomb2. 1. Ariel Precision Medicine. 2. Departments of Medicine, Cell Biology and Molecular Physiology, and Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe and contrast the strengths of precision medicine with Western medicine, and complex trait genetics with Mendelian genetics. Classic genetics focuses on highly penetrant pathogenic variants in a single gene believed to cause or confer a high risk for well-defined phenotypes. However, a minority of disorders have a single gene cause. Further, even individuals with identical Mendelian disease-associated genotypes may exhibit substantial phenotypic variability indicative of genetic and environmental modifiers. Still, most diseases are considered complex traits (or complex diseases). RECENT FINDINGS: New insights into the genetic underpinnings of complex traits provide opportunities for advances in diagnosis and management. Precision medicine provides the framework for integrating complex trait knowledge into clinical care through a sophisticated analysis pipeline. Multidimensional modeling of acquired diseases includes multiple genetic risks scattered over many genes and gene regulators that must be interpreted on the basis of functional evidence (e.g., genomics, transcriptomics) with structured models and expert systems; strengthened with machine learning and artificial intelligence. The choice of genotyping approaches (shotgun sequencing, single nucleotide polymorphism chips, targeted panels) is discussed. SUMMARY: The result of a good precision medicine tool is clinical-decision support and guidance to tackle complex disorders such as pancreatitis, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer oncogenesis.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe and contrast the strengths of precision medicine with Western medicine, and complex trait genetics with Mendelian genetics. Classic genetics focuses on highly penetrant pathogenic variants in a single gene believed to cause or confer a high risk for well-defined phenotypes. However, a minority of disorders have a single gene cause. Further, even individuals with identical Mendelian disease-associated genotypes may exhibit substantial phenotypic variability indicative of genetic and environmental modifiers. Still, most diseases are considered complex traits (or complex diseases). RECENT FINDINGS: New insights into the genetic underpinnings of complex traits provide opportunities for advances in diagnosis and management. Precision medicine provides the framework for integrating complex trait knowledge into clinical care through a sophisticated analysis pipeline. Multidimensional modeling of acquired diseases includes multiple genetic risks scattered over many genes and gene regulators that must be interpreted on the basis of functional evidence (e.g., genomics, transcriptomics) with structured models and expert systems; strengthened with machine learning and artificial intelligence. The choice of genotyping approaches (shotgun sequencing, single nucleotide polymorphism chips, targeted panels) is discussed. SUMMARY: The result of a good precision medicine tool is clinical-decision support and guidance to tackle complex disorders such as pancreatitis, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer oncogenesis.
Authors: David C Whitcomb; Luca Frulloni; Pramod Garg; Julia B Greer; Alexander Schneider; Dhiraj Yadav; Tooru Shimosegawa Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Péter Hegyi; Michael Wilschanski; Shmuel Muallem; Gergely L Lukacs; Miklós Sahin-Tóth; Aliye Uc; Michael A Gray; Zoltán Rakonczay; József Maléth Journal: Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2016 Impact factor: 5.545
Authors: Harrison Brand; Brenda Diergaarde; Michael R O'Connell; David C Whitcomb; Randall E Brand Journal: Pancreas Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Péter Hegyi; Andrea Párniczky; Markus M Lerch; Andrea R G Sheel; Vinciane Rebours; Chris E Forsmark; Marco Del Chiaro; Jonas Rosendahl; Enrique de-Madaria; Ákos Szücs; Kyoichi Takaori; Dhiraj Yadav; Cristian Gheorghe; Zoltán Rakonczay; Xavier Molero; Kazuo Inui; Atsushi Masamune; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Tooru Shimosegawa; John P Neoptolemos; David C Whitcomb; Miklós Sahin-Tóth Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Jessica LaRusch; Jinsei Jung; Ignacio J General; Michele D Lewis; Hyun Woo Park; Randall E Brand; Andres Gelrud; Michelle A Anderson; Peter A Banks; Darwin Conwell; Christopher Lawrence; Joseph Romagnuolo; John Baillie; Samer Alkaade; Gregory Cote; Timothy B Gardner; Stephen T Amann; Adam Slivka; Bimaljit Sandhu; Amy Aloe; Michelle L Kienholz; Dhiraj Yadav; M Michael Barmada; Ivet Bahar; Min Goo Lee; David C Whitcomb Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Ellyn Dunbar; Phil J Greer; Nadine Melhem; Samer Alkaade; Stephen T Amann; Randall Brand; Gregory A Coté; Christopher E Forsmark; Timothy B Gardner; Andres Gelrud; Nalini M Guda; Jessica LaRusch; Michele D Lewis; Jorge D Machicado; Thiruvengadam Muniraj; Georgios I Papachristou; Joseph Romagnuolo; Bimaljit S Sandhu; Stuart Sherman; Charles M Wilcox; Vikesh K Singh; Dhiraj Yadav; David C Whitcomb Journal: J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 6.772