Literature DB >> 35802522

Valuing the Diversity of Research Methods to Advance Nutrition Science.

Richard D Mattes1, Sylvia B Rowe2, Sarah D Ohlhorst3, Andrew W Brown4, Daniel J Hoffman5, DeAnn J Liska6, Edith J M Feskens7, Jaapna Dhillon8, Katherine L Tucker9, Leonard H Epstein10, Lynnette M Neufeld11, Michael Kelley12, Naomi K Fukagawa13, Roger A Sunde14, Steven H Zeisel15, Anthony J Basile16, Laura E Borth14, Emahlea Jackson17.   

Abstract

The ASN Board of Directors appointed the Nutrition Research Task Force to develop a report on scientific methods used in nutrition science to advance discovery, interpretation, and application of knowledge in the field. The genesis of this report was growing concern about the tone of discourse among nutrition professionals and the implications of acrimony on the productive study and translation of nutrition science. Too often, honest differences of opinion are cast as conflicts instead of areas of needed collaboration. Recognition of the value (and limitations) of contributions from well-executed nutrition science derived from the various approaches used in the discipline, as well as appreciation of how their layering will yield the strongest evidence base, will provide a basis for greater productivity and impact. Greater collaborative efforts within the field of nutrition science will require an understanding that each method or approach has a place and function that should be valued and used together to create the nutrition evidence base. Precision nutrition was identified as an important emerging nutrition topic by the preponderance of task force members, and this theme was adopted for the report because it lent itself to integration of many approaches in nutrition science. Although the primary audience for this report is nutrition researchers and other nutrition professionals, a secondary aim is to develop a document useful for the various audiences that translate nutrition research, including journalists, clinicians, and policymakers. The intent is to promote accurate, transparent, verifiable evidence-based communication about nutrition science. This will facilitate reasoned interpretation and application of emerging findings and, thereby, improve understanding and trust in nutrition science and appropriate characterization, development, and adoption of recommendations.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evidence base; methods; nutrition science; precision nutrition; research; translation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35802522      PMCID: PMC9340992          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmac043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   11.567


  455 in total

1.  The use of bioelectrical impedance to detect excess visceral and subcutaneous fat.

Authors:  Rômulo A Fernandes; Clara S C Rosa; Camila Buonani; Arli R de Oliveira; Ismael F Freitas Júnior
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.197

2.  Prediction of fruit and vegetable intake from biomarkers using individual participant data of diet-controlled intervention studies.

Authors:  Olga W Souverein; Jeanne H M de Vries; Riitta Freese; Bernhard Watzl; Achim Bub; Edgar R Miller; Jacqueline J M Castenmiller; Wilrike J Pasman; Karin van Het Hof; Mridula Chopra; Anette Karlsen; Lars O Dragsted; Renate Winkels; Catherine Itsiopoulos; Laima Brazionis; Kerin O'Dea; Carolien A van Loo-Bouwman; Ton H J Naber; Hilko van der Voet; Hendriek C Boshuizen
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.718

3.  Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice.

Authors:  Siegfried Geyer; Orjan Hemström; Richard Peter; Denny Vågerö
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Mechanisms behind the portion size effect: visibility and bite size.

Authors:  Kyle S Burger; Jennifer O Fisher; Susan L Johnson
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Evaluation of web-based, self-administered, graphical food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  Alan R Kristal; Ann S Kolar; James L Fisher; Jesse J Plascak; Phyllis J Stumbo; Rick Weiss; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  Using cognitive mapping to understand Senegalese infant and young child feeding decisions.

Authors:  Stephanie Zobrist; Nikhila Kalra; Gretel Pelto; Brittney Wittenbrink; Peiman Milani; Abdoulaye Moussa Diallo; Tidiane Ndoye; Issa Wone; Megan Parker
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.

Authors:  A J Stunkard; S Messick
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes.

Authors:  Ross Overbeek; Tadhg Begley; Ralph M Butler; Jomuna V Choudhuri; Han-Yu Chuang; Matthew Cohoon; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Naryttza Diaz; Terry Disz; Robert Edwards; Michael Fonstein; Ed D Frank; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Alexander Goesmann; Andrew Hanson; Dirk Iwata-Reuyl; Roy Jensen; Neema Jamshidi; Lutz Krause; Michael Kubal; Niels Larsen; Burkhard Linke; Alice C McHardy; Folker Meyer; Heiko Neuweger; Gary Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei Osterman; Vasiliy Portnoy; Gordon D Pusch; Dmitry A Rodionov; Christian Rückert; Jason Steiner; Rick Stevens; Ines Thiele; Olga Vassieva; Yuzhen Ye; Olga Zagnitko; Veronika Vonstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Depression, emotional eating and long-term weight changes: a population-based prospective study.

Authors:  Hanna Konttinen; Tatjana van Strien; Satu Männistö; Pekka Jousilahti; Ari Haukkala
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 10.  Stable isotopes: their use and safety in human nutrition studies.

Authors:  Peter S W Davies
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  ASN Highlights the Need for Multiple Methods Within Nutrition Research to Advance the Field.

Authors:  Paul M Coates
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2022-07-08

2.  Breaking new frontiers: Assessment and re-evaluation of clinical trial design for nutraceuticals.

Authors:  Malkanthi Evans; Erin D Lewis; Joseph M Antony; David C Crowley; Najla Guthrie; Jeffrey B Blumberg
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.