| Literature DB >> 28703758 |
Ji-Eun Lee1, Sihan Song2, Jeong Sun Ahn3, Yoonhee Kim4, Jung Eun Lee5.
Abstract
Given the increasing social and economic burden of chronic disease and the need for efficient approaches to prevent and treat chronic disease, emphasis on the use of information and communication technology (ICT)-based health care has emerged. We aimed to test the feasibility of a mobile application, Diet-A, and examine whether Diet-A could be used to monitor dietary intake among adolescents. In a three-month pre-post intervention study, 9 male and 24 female high school students aged 16-18 years consented and participated in this study. Participants were instructed to record all foods and beverages consumed using voice or text mode input. Nutrient intake was measured using 24-h recalls pre- and post-intervention. We compared nutrient intake data assessed by Diet-A application with those assessed by 24-h recalls. Participants tended to underreport intakes of nutrients compared to those assessed by two 24-h recalls. There were significant decreases in sodium (p = 0.04) and calcium (p = 0.03) intake between pre- and post-intervention. Of participants who completed questionnaires of feasibility (n = 24), 61.9% reported that they were satisfied using the application to monitor their food intake, and 47.7% liked getting personal information about their dietary intake from the application. However, more than 70% of participants answered that it was burdensome to use the application or that they had trouble remembering to record their food intake. The mobile application Diet-A offers the opportunity to monitor dietary intake through real-time feedback. However, use of Diet-A may not provide accurate information on the food intake of adolescents, partly because of the recording burden.Entities:
Keywords: dietary assessment; feasibility; mobile application; mobile health care; pre–post intervention
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28703758 PMCID: PMC5537862 DOI: 10.3390/nu9070748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flow chart of developing stage of application.
Figure 2Flowchart of participants.
Baseline characteristics of adolescents enrolled in an intervention study of mobile application, Diet-A (n = 33).
| Male ( | Female ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Mean ± standard deviation | ||
| 16.9 ± 0.3 | 17.4 ± 0.6 | 0.016 | |
| 21.4 ± 2.6 | 22.4 ± 4.5 | 0.571 | |
| <18.5 | 2 (22.2) | 2 (8.3) | 0.445 |
| 18.5 ≤ 23 | 5 (55.6) | 15 (62.5) | |
| 23 ≤ 25 | 2 (22.2) | 3 (12.5) | |
| 25+ | 0 (0.0) | 4 (16.7) | |
| Yes | 3 (33.3) | 11 (45.8) | 0.698 |
| No | 6 (66.7) | 13 (54.2) | |
| None | 0 (0.0) | 16 (66.7) | <0.001 |
| 1–2 per week | 1 (11.1) | 5 (20.8) | |
| 3+ per week | 8 (88.9) | 3 (12.5) | |
| Yes | 4 (44.4) | 7 (29.2) | 0.438 |
| No | 5 (55.6) | 17 (70.8) | |
1 Differences between male and female were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum test. 2 Body mass index (BMI), calculated from self-reported weight and height (kg/m2). 3 Differences between male and female were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test.
Comparison of the nutrient intake from Diet-A vs. nutrient intake from 24-h recalls among all male and female students (n = 21).
| Nutrients | Diet-A 1 ( | 24-h Recalls 2 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± standard deviation | |||
| Energy (kcal/day) | 1427 ± 379 | 1893 ±394 | 0.002 |
| Carbohydrates (g/day) | 198.8 ± 48.8 | 255.6 ± 54.6 | 0.003 |
| Protein (g/day) | 50.5 ± 19.4 | 76.2 ± 25.3 | 0.002 |
| Total fat (g/day) | 38.8 ± 15.6 | 62.0 ± 21.2 | <0.001 |
| Sodium (mg/day) | 2436.8 ± 956.3 | 3204.7 ± 1090.6 | 0.020 |
| Saturated fat (g/day) | 11.4 ± 4.0 | 13.2 ± 8.7 | 0.390 |
| Calcium (mg/day) | 225.4 ± 105.0 | 511.0 ± 312.1 | <0.001 |
| Iron (mg/day) | 11.3 ± 6.7 | 13.5 ± 4.8 | 0.210 |
1 The average of number of days that participants used Diet-A was 12.2 days (interquartile range: 6–14 days). 2 Mean values of two 24-h recalls were estimated by the CAN-Pro 4.0 program. 3 Differences between two dietary assessment methods were analyzed using paired t-test.
Comparison of the nutrient intake from pre- and post-24-h recalls among all male and female students (n = 33).
| Nutrients | 24-h Recall at Pre-Intervention ( | 24-h Recall at Post-Intervention ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± standard deviation | |||
| Energy (kcal/day) | 1929 ± 668 | 1696 ± 593 | 0.107 |
| Carbohydrates (g/day) | 261.3 ± 70.9 | 231.3 ± 87.1 | 0.068 |
| Protein (g/day) | 79.2 ± 46.9 | 64.8 ± 26.0 | 0.143 |
| Total fat (g/day) | 62.6 ± 33.6 | 55.1 ± 25.8 | 0.298 |
| Sodium (mg/day) | 3374.5 ± 1869.0 | 2567.1 ± 1328.8 | 0.040 |
| Saturated fat (g/day) | 10.9 ± 9.2 | 13.0 ± 9.4 | 0.280 |
| Calcium (mg/day) | 534.6 ± 304.4 | 390.0 ± 361.0 | 0.034 |
| Iron (mg/day) | 14.6 ± 7.2 | 11.4 ± 6.3 | 0.072 |
There was a 3-month interval between pre-intervention and post-intervention. 1 Differences between pre- and post-24-h recalls were analyzed using paired t-test.
Agreement with items on the feasibility questionnaire about Diet-A use among application users (n = 21).
| Item | Totally Disagree | Slightly Disagree | Neutral | Slightly Agree | Totally Agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. This application was an easy way to monitor my dietary intake | 21 | 1 (4.8) | 3 (14.3) | 8 (38.1) | 6 (28.6) | 3 (14.3) |
| 2. I learned about my dietary intake during the period I used Diet-A | 21 | 1 (4.8) | 1 (4.8) | 7 (33.3) | 10 (47.6) | 2 (9.5) |
| 3. The function of taking photographs helped me to remember the foods I ate | 20 | 3 (15.0) | 3 (15.0) | 7 (35.0) | 6 (30.0) | 1 (5.0) |
| 4. The voice recognizing function helped me to input what I ate in a convenient way | 20 | 5 (25.0) | 7 (35.0) | 5 (25.0) | 3 (15.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| 5. I was ashamed to use the voice recognition function | 20 | 3 (15.0) | 4 (20.0) | 6 (30.0) | 4 (20.0) | 3 (15.0) |
| 6. The application made me think about how to change my dietary intake | 21 | 1 (4.8) | 3 (14.3) | 9 (42.9) | 6 (28.6) | 2 (9.5) |
| 7. This application actually influenced my dietary habits | 21 | 1 (4.8) | 5 (23.8) | 9 (42.9) | 4 (19.1) | 2 (9.5) |
| 8. This application was helpful for monitoring the food consumed | 20 | 1 (5.0) | 1 (5.0) | 5 (25.0) | 9 (45.0) | 4 (20.0) |
| 9. The application was easy to use | 21 | 3 (14.3) | 7 (33.3) | 3 (14.3) | 4 (19.1) | 4 (19.1) |
| 10. I was able to get enough clues about meaning of each menu | 21 | 1 (4.8) | 2 (9.5) | 10 (47.6) | 7 (33.3) | 1 (4.8) |
| 11. It was helpful to manage my dietary intake using the application | 21 | 1 (4.8) | 3 (14.3) | 9 (42.9) | 6 (28.6) | 2 (9.5) |
| 12. I was able to quickly find the menu that I need from the application | 21 | 4 (19.1) | 5 (23.8) | 6 (28.6) | 4 (19.1) | 2 (9.5) |
| 13. The information provided on the application was easy to understand | 21 | 2 (9.5) | 5 (23.8) | 5 (23.8) | 6 (28.6) | 3 (14.3) |
| 14. The information provided on the application was helpful | 21 | 1 (4.8) | 1 (4.8) | 11 (52.4) | 7 (33.3) | 1 (4.8) |
| 15. I enjoyed using the application | 21 | 2 (9.5) | 4 (19.1) | 8 (38.1) | 6 (28.6) | 1 (4.8) |
| 16. I was satisfied with using the application to monitor my dietary intake | 21 | 1 (4.8) | 4 (19.1) | 3 (14.3) | 11 (52.4) | 2 (9.5) |
| 17. I liked getting customized information about my dietary intake | 21 | 1 (4.8) | 3 (14.3) | 7 (33.3) | 9 (42.9) | 1 (4.8) |
| 18. This application interfered with my daily life | 21 | 6 (28.6) | 10 (47.6) | 3 (14.3) | 1 (4.8) | 1 (4.8) |
| 19. It took a long time to use this application | 21 | 2 (9.5) | 4 (19.1) | 8 (38.1) | 6 (28.6) | 1 (4.8) |
| 20. It was burdensome to use this application | 21 | 0 (0.0) | 3 (14.3) | 3 (14.3) | 12 (57.1) | 3 (14.3) |
| 21. Sometimes, I had trouble remembering to record my dietary intake | 21 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.8) | 2 (9.5) | 11 (52.4) | 7 (33.3) |