Literature DB >> 24002044

Feasibility of a SenseCam-assisted 24-h recall to reduce under-reporting of energy intake.

L Gemming1, A Doherty, P Kelly, J Utter, C Ni Mhurchu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: The SenseCam is a camera worn on a lanyard around the neck that automatically captures point-of-view images in response to movement, heat and light (every 20-30 s). This device may enhance the accuracy of self-reported dietary intake by assisting participants' recall of food and beverage consumption. It was the objective of this study to evaluate if the wearable camera, SenseCam, can enhance the 24-h dietary recall by providing visual prompts to improve recall of food and beverage consumption. SUBJECT/
METHODS: Thirteen volunteer adults in Oxford, United Kingdom, were recruited. Participants wore the SenseCam for 2 days while continuing their usual daily activities. On day 3, participants' diets were assessed using an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. SenseCam images were then shown to the participants and any additional dietary information that participants provided after viewing the images was recorded. Energy and macronutrient intakes were compared between the 24-h recall and 24-h recall+SenseCam.
RESULTS: Data from 10 participants were included in the final analysis (8 males and 2 females), mean age 33 ± 11 years, mean BMI 25.9 ± 5.1 kg/m(2). Viewing the SenseCam images increased self-reported energy intake by approximately 1432 ± 1564 kJ or 12.5% compared with the 24-h recall alone (P=0.02). The increase was predominantly due to reporting of 41 additional foods (241 vs 282 total foods) across a range of food groups. Eight changes in portion size were made, which resulted in a negligible change to energy intake.
CONCLUSIONS: Wearable cameras are promising method to enhance the accuracy of self-reported dietary assessment methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24002044     DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  35 in total

1.  Dietary under-reporting: what foods and which meals are typically under-reported?

Authors:  L Gemming; C Ni Mhurchu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Considering the value of dietary assessment data in informing nutrition-related health policy.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Thomas G Hurley; Susan E Steck; Donald R Miller; Fred K Tabung; Karen E Peterson; Lawrence H Kushi; Edward A Frongillo
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Smart-Glasses: Exposing and Elucidating the Ethical Issues.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Dušan Haustein; Laurens Landeweerd
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Perspective: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not a Panacea for Diet-Related Research.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Edward A Frongillo; Swann A Adams; Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Thomas G Hurley; Donald R Miller; Ira S Ockene
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  Acceptability and feasibility of smartphone-assisted 24 h recalls in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Jiajie Zang; Jun Song; Zhengyuan Wang; Chunxia Yao; Jianhong Ma; Cuihua Huang; Zhenni Zhu; Lindsey P Smith; Shufa Du; Jenna Hua; Edmund Seto; Barry M Popkin; Shurong Zou
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  Automatic food detection in egocentric images using artificial intelligence technology.

Authors:  Wenyan Jia; Yuecheng Li; Ruowei Qu; Thomas Baranowski; Lora E Burke; Hong Zhang; Yicheng Bai; Juliet M Mancino; Guizhi Xu; Zhi-Hong Mao; Mingui Sun
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  Acculturation and dietary change among Chinese immigrant women in the United States.

Authors:  Marilyn Tseng; David J Wright; Carolyn Y Fang
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-04

8.  Under-reporting remains a key limitation of self-reported dietary intake: an analysis of the 2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey.

Authors:  L Gemming; Y Jiang; B Swinburn; J Utter; C Ni Mhurchu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Validation of improved 24-hour dietary recall using a portable camera among the Japanese population.

Authors:  Yumi Matsushita; Tosei Takahashi; Kumiko Asahi; Emiko Harashima; Hiroko Takahashi; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Yoshiko Tsumuraya; Nobuko Sarukura; Masashi Furuta; Heizo Tanaka; Tetsuji Yokoyama
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Using Wearable Cameras to Assess Foods and Beverages Omitted in 24 Hour Dietary Recalls and a Text Entry Food Record App.

Authors:  Virginia Chan; Alyse Davies; Lyndal Wellard-Cole; Silvia Lu; Hoi Ng; Lok Tsoi; Anjali Tiscia; Louise Signal; Anna Rangan; Luke Gemming; Margaret Allman-Farinelli
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.