| Literature DB >> 35520281 |
Marina Gonzalez-Ramirez1,2, Angela Cejudo-Lopez3, Mauricio Lozano-Navarrete4, Elena Salamero Sánchez-Gabriel5, M Alfonso Torres-Bengoa5, Manuel Segura-Balbuena6, Maria J Sanchez-Cordero7, Mercedes Barroso-Vazquez7, Francisco J Perez-Barba3, Ana M Troncoso2, M Carmen Garcia-Parrilla2, Ana B Cerezo2.
Abstract
In recent years, the use of applications to improve dietary habits has increased. Although numerous nutrition apps are available on the market, only few have been developed by health and nutrition professionals based on scientific evidence and subsequently tested to prove their usability. The main objective of this study was to design, develop, and evaluate the usability of a tailored nutrition application to be used to promote healthy eating habits. In order to decide app design and content, three focus groups took place with fifteen professionals from primary healthcare, nutrition, and food science and computer science, as well as expert users. For the general and feedback message design, a reference model based on the scientific literature was developed. To address the multi-perspective approach of users' and external healthcare professionals' feedback, a one-day pilot testing with potential users and healthcare professionals was conducted with four focus groups. To evaluate the relevance and potential usability of the app a 1-month pilot test was conducted in a real-life environment. A total of 42 volunteers participated in the one-day pilot testing, and 39 potential users participated in the 1-month pilot test. The SAlBi educa app developed includes an online dietary record, a self-monitoring tool to evaluate dietary patterns, general and feedback messages, and examples of traditional Mediterranean recipes. The usability study showed that volunteers think that SAlBi educa is pleasant (59%) and easy to learn to use (94%). Over 84% of the volunteers declared that the nutritional messages were clear and useful. Volunteers stated that general and tailored recommendations, as well as self-monitoring, were SAlBi educa's most motivating and useful features. SAlBi educa is an innovative, user-friendly nutritional education tool with the potential to engage and help individuals to follow dietary habits based on the Mediterranean model.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean diet; feedback; healthy diet; mHealth; mobile application; nutrition education; text messaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 35520281 PMCID: PMC9063930 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.782430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Recommendations used for the evaluation tool algorithms.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Number of meals | 5 per day | ( |
| Calories intake distribution | 25% Breakfas | ( |
| 10% Midmorning snack | ||
| 30% Lunch | ||
| 10% Afternoon snack | ||
| 25% Dinner | ||
| Fats | 25–35% | ( |
| Carbohydrates | 45–60% | ( |
| Sugars | <10% | ( |
| Proteins | 10–15% | ( |
| Fiber | 25 g | ( |
| Fruit and vegetables | 5 per day | ( |
Features and main results of general and feedback messages included in different studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| My fitness pal | Weight management | General message topics: Nutritional knowledge, good and not so good food choices, and predictions of future body weight based on daily intake | Although most users rated the messages positively, some expressed concern regarding: i) obvious statements, ii) indication of poor food choices despite users' low consumption of the same, iii) long-term weight predictions based on current daily intake and iv) negative messages. | ( |
| Children eating well (CHIEW) | To increase the intake of fruit, vegetables, fiber, and water and reduce the intake of sugary drinks, through parental' information. | - General message topics: | - New fruits and vegetables introduced - Sugary drinks reduced and substituted by water - Parents offered their children more fruit and vegetables - Improvement in diet | ( |
| ONCOFOOD | To improve the dietary goals of cancer patients. | -Daily diet record reminder messages (9:00, 13:00 and 19:00) | Those who used the application met 100% of the protein, fat, and energy requirements, compared to the control group that did not reach this goal. Compared to the control group that lost weight (1.03 kg vs. −1.46 kg) as well as muscle mass (0.58 kg vs. −0.61 kg) the group that used the application gained weight significantly | ( |
| PYNC | To promote healthy habits (physical activity, healthy weight, calorie intake reduction, healthy diet) for reducing the risk of breast cancer | -General message topics: educational information on the benefits of weight loss through healthy eating, increasing consumption of fruit and vegetables, reducing intake of sugar or red meat, limiting alcohol intake, promoting physical activity, etc.) | Volunteers preferred simple language, visually presented information, easy-to-prepare healthy recipes, suggestions for grocery shopping or refrigerator ordering, and strategies for interpreting food labeling | ( |
| Txt4happy kids | To increase fruit and vegetables consumption in families with children | General messages: | 92% of parents offered more fruit and vegetables to their children because they were aware of the benefits. 86% tried to follow a healthy diet. 85% tried different recipes with fruit and vegetables. 81% were concerned about what their children were consuming. Moreover, 83% agreed that the presence of fruit and vegetables at home had increased since the study. Although, message strategy alone does not seem enough to increase fruit and vegetable consumption | ( |
| Body quest parent | To prevent obesity and improve healthy eating habits in children (increased vegetable consumption) | General messages: | Significant increase in vegetables consumption | ( |
| To decrease consumption of sugary drinks and juices. | -Messages with recommendations, motivation, and advice on progress (3–4/ week) | Significant decrease of 287 mL/day compared to the control group (50 mL/day) and weight decrease by 2.4 kg compared to a gain of 0.9 kg in the control group | ( | |
| To increase knowledge on Type 2 Diabetes: prevention, treatment, and management | General messages: | Significant increase in knowledge about the pathology among the intervened group compared to the control group. | ( | |
| To promote nutritional behavioral changes in children through parents. | General messages: | Both parents, experts, and their group evaluated the clarity, usability, and relevance of the messages with 4 points out of 5 | ( | |
| To increase fruit and vegetables consumption. To reduce the consumption of food with a low nutrient density and sugary drinks | Feedback messages: | Significant reduction in weight (1.7 kg) in experimental group; consumption of low nutrient density foods in experimental group (1.4 servings/day, in men) and consumption of sugary drinks (0.2 servings/day) in experimental group regarding control, in women | ( | |
| TreC-LifeStyle | To provide nutritional education for families with overweight children | -Daily reports summarizing the deviations and adequacy of their dietary intake with respect to a healthy diet | The results showed a good adherence to the app with> 90% of the meals recorded over 6 weeks, demonstrating a good acceptance app over the 6 weeks. The parents declared usability as very positive Participants stated that they were influenced by the feedback provided | ( |
| To reduce the weight of an obese population | -Feedback messages: After recording weight, the application automatically provided users with a personalized feedback message about their progress and tips | Significant weight loss in the group intervened: 43% of the patients in the intervention group were more likely to lose 5% or more of their original weight at 6 months, compared to 6% of the patients in the usual care control group | ( | |
| To study the tone, content, and length of nutritional messages | General messages: | 22 and 29% of respondents indicated that the empathetic tone and the messages based on solutions or healthy alternatives, respectively, were the most persuasive strategy to produce improvements in diet, compared to the others that obtained a lower percentage of choice. | ( | |
| Diet-A | To monitor intake in adolescents | -Registration reminders (11:00, 15:00, and 20:00) | 61.9% of users said they were satisfied after using the application for monitoring their intake Significant reduction in sodium intake | ( |
| To increase vegetable consumption among young adults. | General messages: 1–2 sentences; tips on how to introduce vegetables in the weekly menu; motivational message describing the healthy benefits of fruit | The text messages promoted motivational changes in the consumption of fruit and vegetables | ( |
Figure 1Tasks carried out by participants in the one-day pilot testing.
Figure 2Profile, recipe, and product example.
Figure 3Weekly meal planner and a healthy breakfast recommendation.
Figure 4SAlBi educa's self-monitoring tool.
Characteristics of the message model for its implementation in SAlBi educa.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| 160 characters | ( |
|
| 10.00. User-modifiable | ( |
| 16.00–18.00 h | ( | |
|
| 1–4 messages/week | ( |
|
| ||
|
| Healthy diet and nutritional advice | ( |
| Examples of everyday situations of increased risk of unhealthy food consumption and healthy suggestions to avoid it | ||
| Recipes and healthy eating information links | ||
| Information to promote reflection, discussion, and action | ||
| Recommendations for healthy snacks and drinks | ||
| Benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption | ||
| Benefits of increasing fiber consumption | ||
| Reducing sugar consumption | ||
| Information on portion sizes | ||
| Good food choices | ||
|
| Weight progress | ( |
| Macronutrient and energy assessment | ||
| Motivational, suggesting healthy alternatives, including nutritional advice and simple concepts | ||
|
| Simple | ( |
| Personalized with the user's name | ||
| Empathetic |
Figure 5General and tailored messages.
Figure 6Examples of general and feedback messages.
Characteristics of the study population.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 | 21 | 17 | 12 | 16 | 11 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 27 | 15 | 30 | 9 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 13 | 29 | 7 | 32 | |||
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 23 | 19 | 39 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 | 37 | 1 | 3 | 33 | 3 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 27 | 11 | 4 | 18 | 16 | 5 | |
|
|
|
| ||||
| 18 | 16 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 5 | |
Results of the satisfaction questionnaire.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 16/39 (41%) | 23/39 (59%) | 13/39 (33.3%) | 26/39 (66.7%) | ||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 3/39 (7.69%) | 36/39 (92.3%) | 16/39 (41%) | 23/39 (59%) | ||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 41/41 (100%) | 0 | 37/39 (94.9%) | 2/39 (5.13%) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| Very Bad-Very Good | 0 | 3/37 (8.11%) | 34/37 (91.9%) | 1/39 (2.56%) | 19/39 (48.8%) | 19/39 (48.8%) |
| Frustrating-Nice | 0 | 1/34 (2.94%) | 33/34 (97.1%) | 2/39 (5.13%) | 14/39 (35.9%) | 23/39 (59.0%) |
| Boring-Stimulating | 0 | 3/36 (8.33%) | 33/36 (91.7%) | 2/39 (5.13%) | 24/39 (61.5%) | 13/39 (33.3%) |
| Difficult-Easy | 0 | 4/31 (12.9%) | 27/31 (87.1%) | 0 | 10//39 (25.6%) | 29//39 (74.4%) |
|
| ||||||
| Letters on the app display (Hard to Read-Easy to Read) | 0 | 0 | 42/42 (100%) | 1/39 (2.56%) | 8/39 (20.5%) | 30/39 (76.9%) |
| Highlighting of items on the screen (Unhelpful-Very useful) | 0 | 0 | 40/40 (100%) | 0 | 11/39 (28.2%) | 28/39 (71.8%) |
| Format of the screens was useful (Never-Always) | 0 | 1/41 (2.44%) | 40/41 (97.6%) | 1/39 (2.56%) | 8/39 (20.5%) | 30/39 (76.9%) |
| Screen sequence (Confusing-Clear) | 0 | 0 | 39/39 (100%) | 0 | 12/39 (30.8%) | 27/39 (69.2%) |
|
| ||||||
| Use of terminology in the app (Inconsistent-Consistent) | 0 | 0 | 38/38 (100%) | 0 | 7/39 (18%) | 32/39 (82%) |
| Is the terminology appropriate given the task you are doing? (Never-Always) | 0 | 1/38 (2.63%) | 37/38 (97.4%) | 0 | 7/39 (18%) | 32/39 (82%) |
|
| ||||||
| Learning to use the app (Difficult-Easy) | 0 | 5/38 (13.2%) | 33/38 (86.8%) | 0 | 3/39 (7.69%) | 36/39 (92.3%) |
| Exploring the app by trial and error (Discouragement-Feedback) | 0 | 1/36 (2.78%) | 35/36 (97.2%) | 3/39 (7.7%) | 13/39 (33.3%) | 23/39 (59.0%) |
| Tasks can be conducted without difficulty (Never-Always) | 0 | 3/36 (8.33%) | 33/36 (91.7%) | 2/39 (5.13%) | 8/39 (20.5%) | 29/39 (74.4%) |
| Number of steps per task (Too Many-Fair) | 0 | 4/33 (12.1%) | 29/33 (87.9%) | 5/39 (12.82%) | 9/39 (23.1%) | 25/39 (64.1%) |
| Steps to complete a task follow a logical sequence (Never-Always) | 0 | 3/39 (7.69%) | 36/39 (92.3%) | 0 | 12/39 (30.8%) | 27/39 (69.2%) |
|
| ||||||
| System speed (Too Slow-Very Fast) | 0 | 1/39 (2.56%) | 38/39 (97.4%) | 1/39 (2.56%) | 10/39 (25.6%) | 28/39 (71.8%) |
| The system is reliable (Never-Always) | 0 | 0 | 40/40 (100%) | 1/39 (2.56%) | 6/39 (15.4%) | 32/39 (82.1%) |
| Correct my mistakes (Difficult-Easy) | 0 | 2/36 (5.56%) | 34/36 (94.4%) | 2/39 (5.13%) | 11/39 (28.2%) | 26/39 (66.7%) |
| System ease of use depends on my level of experience (Never-Always) | 0 | 1/40 (2.5%) | 39/40 (97.5%) | 4/39 (10.26%) | 18/39 (46.2%) | 17/39 (43.6%) |
|
| ||||||
| Quality of illustrations and photographs (Bad-Good) | 0 | 0 | 39/39 (100%) | 2/39 (5.13%) | 11/39 (28.2%) | 26/39 (66.7%) |
| Colors used (Artificial- Natural) | 0 | 0 | 39/39 (100%) | 1/39 (2.56%) | 7/39 (18%) | 31/39 (79.5%) |
|
| ||||||
| Clear messages (Disagree - Agree) | 0 | 3 (7.69%) | 36/39 (92.3%) | 6/39 (15.38%) | 10/39 (25.6%) | 23/39 (59%) |
| Useful messages (Disagree - Agree) | 0 | 0 | 39/39 (100%) | 5/39 (12.82%) | 11/39 (28.2%) | 23/39 (59.0%) |
| Relevant messages (Disagree-OK) | 0 | 1/38 (2.63%) | 37/38 (97.4%) | 4/39 (10.26%) | 14/39 (35.9%) | 21/39 (53.8%) |
| Persuasive potential to improve diet/physical activity (Very Low Potential - High Potential) | 0 | 5/36 (13.9%) | 31/36 (86.1%) | 6/39 (15.38%) | 14/39 (35.9%) | 19/39 (48.7%) |
|
| • Images (4/42) | • General recommendations (22/39) | ||||
|
| • Database with most common dishes (20/42) | • Improve food search (9/39) | ||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 38/40 (95%) | 2/40 (5%) | 29/39 (74.4%) | 10/39 (25.6%) | ||
|
| 38/38 (100%) | 0 | 30/39 (76.9%) | 9/39 (23.1%) | ||
|
| 1/32 (3.13%) | 31/32 (96.87%) | 4/39 10.3%) | 35/39 (89.7%) | ||
Results of satisfaction users' punctuation to the QUIS 7.0 questionnaire.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| General impression | 7.43 | 8 | 1.45 | 6.56 | 7 | 1.59 |
| Screenshots | 7.84 | 8 | 1.65 | 7.25 | 7 | 1.56 |
| Terminology & information | 7.80 | 8 | 1.64 | 7.29 | 7 | 1.39 |
| Learning | 7.28 | 8 | 2.13 | 7.12 | 7 | 1.72 |
| System capacity | 7.84 | 8 | 1.68 | 6.85 | 7 | 1.75 |
| Multimedia | 8.45 | 9 | 2.29 | 7.14 | 7 | 1.73 |
| Nutritional messages | 7.31 | 7 | 2.57 | 6.42 | 7 | 2.25 |
Figure 7Improvements implemented in SAlBi educa last version.
Satisfaction punctuation (median) at different educational levels and gender.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
| GI | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| SC | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| TI | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| LE | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| SY | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| MU | 7 | 7.5 | 7 | 8 |
| NU | 6 | 7.5 | 7 | 7 |
| Total satisfaction | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
GI, general impression; SC, screenshots; TI, terminology and information; LE, learning; SY, system capacity; MU, multimedia; NU, nutritional messages;
means significant differences within educational level for nutritional messages questions, p < 0.05.
Figure 8Synthesis of SAlBi educa.