BACKGROUND: Breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, but little is known about factors associated with breast density in women over 70. METHODS: Percent breast density, sex hormone levels and breast cancer risk factor data were obtained on 239 women ages 70-92 recruited from 1986 to 1988 in the United States. Multivariable linear regression was used to develop a model to describe factors associated with percent density. RESULTS: Median (range) percent density among women was 23.7% (0-85%). Body mass index (beta=-0.345, p<0.001 adjusted for age and parity) and parity (beta=-0.277, p<0.001 adjusted for age and BMI) were significantly and inversely associated with percent breast density. After adjusting for parity and BMI, age was not associated with breast density (beta=0.05, p=0.45). Parous women had lower percent density than nulliparous women (23.7 versus 34.7%, p=0.005). Women who had undergone surgical menopause had greater breast density than those who had had a natural menopause (33.4 versus 24.8%, p=0.048), as did women who were not current smokers (26.0 versus 17.3% for smokers, p=0.02). Breast density was not associated with age at menarche, age at menopause, age at first birth, breastfeeding, estrogen levels or androgen levels. In a multivariable model, 24% of the variance in percent breast density was explained by BMI (beta=-0.35), parity (beta=-0.29), surgical menopause (beta=0.13) and current smoking (beta=-0.12). CONCLUSION: Factors associated with breast density in older, post-menopausal women differ from traditional breast cancer risk factors and from factors associated with breast density in pre-menopausal and younger post-menopausal women.
BACKGROUND: Breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, but little is known about factors associated with breast density in women over 70. METHODS: Percent breast density, sex hormone levels and breast cancer risk factor data were obtained on 239 women ages 70-92 recruited from 1986 to 1988 in the United States. Multivariable linear regression was used to develop a model to describe factors associated with percent density. RESULTS: Median (range) percent density among women was 23.7% (0-85%). Body mass index (beta=-0.345, p<0.001 adjusted for age and parity) and parity (beta=-0.277, p<0.001 adjusted for age and BMI) were significantly and inversely associated with percent breast density. After adjusting for parity and BMI, age was not associated with breast density (beta=0.05, p=0.45). Parous women had lower percent density than nulliparous women (23.7 versus 34.7%, p=0.005). Women who had undergone surgical menopause had greater breast density than those who had had a natural menopause (33.4 versus 24.8%, p=0.048), as did women who were not current smokers (26.0 versus 17.3% for smokers, p=0.02). Breast density was not associated with age at menarche, age at menopause, age at first birth, breastfeeding, estrogen levels or androgen levels. In a multivariable model, 24% of the variance in percent breast density was explained by BMI (beta=-0.35), parity (beta=-0.29), surgical menopause (beta=0.13) and current smoking (beta=-0.12). CONCLUSION: Factors associated with breast density in older, post-menopausal women differ from traditional breast cancer risk factors and from factors associated with breast density in pre-menopausal and younger post-menopausal women.
Authors: Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Kimberly A Bertrand; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Jafi A Lipson; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Martin J Yaffe; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Valerie McGuire; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Russell McBride; Valerie McGuire; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Jafi A Lipson; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Martin J Yaffe; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Laurel A Habel; Weiva Sieh; Russell B McBride; Kezhen Fei; Joseph H Rothstein; Stacey E Alexeeff; Xiaoyu Song; Lori C Sakoda; Valerie McGuire; Ninah Achacoso; Luana Acton; Rhea Y Liang; Jafi A Lipson; Martin J Yaffe; Daniel L Rubin; Alice S Whittemore Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Francesmary Modugno; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2007-12-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Joanne F Dorgan; Catherine Klifa; Snehal Deshmukh; Brian L Egleston; John A Shepherd; Peter O Kwiterovich; Linda Van Horn; Linda G Snetselaar; Victor J Stevens; Alan M Robson; Norman L Lasser; Nola M Hylton Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2013-08-10 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Virginia Lope; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; María Carmen Santamariña; Pilar Moreo; Carmen Vidal; Maria Soledad Laso; Maria Ederra; Carmen Pedraz-Pingarrón; Isabel González-Román; Milagros García-López; Dolores Salas-Trejo; Mercé Peris; María Pilar Moreno; Jose Antonio Vázquez-Carrete; Francisca Collado; Nuria Aragonés; Marina Pollán Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Shannon M Conroy; Carolyn J Crandall; Gail A Greendale; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.506