Literature DB >> 17131324

Different types of postmenopausal hormone therapy and mammographic density in Norwegian women.

Yngve Bremnes1, Giske Ursin, Nils Bjurstam, Eiliv Lund, Inger Torhild Gram.   

Abstract

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. The HTs used in Scandinavia is associated with higher risk estimates than those used in most other countries. Mammographic density is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer, and possibly an intermediate marker for breast cancer. We decided to examine the relationship between use of different types of HT and mammographic density in Norwegian women. Altogether, 1,007 postmenopausal participants in the governmental mammographic screening program were asked about current and previous HT use. Mammograms were classified according to percent and absolute mammographic density. Overall, current users of HT had on average 3.6% higher mean percent mammographic density when compared with never users (p < 0.001). After adjustment for age at screening, number of children and BMI in a multivariate model, women using the continuous estradiol (E(2)) plus norethisterone acetate (NETA) combination had a mean percent mammographic density significantly higher than never users (6.1% absolute difference). Those using the continuous E(2) plus NETA combination had an 4.8% (absolute difference) higher mean percent mammographic density after <5 years of use when compared with never users, while the corresponding number for >or=5 years of use was 7% (p-trend < 0.001). We found similar associations when absolute mammographic density was used as the outcome variable. In summary, our study shows a statistical significant positive dose-response association between current use of the continuous E(2) plus NETA combination and both measures of mammographic density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17131324     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  6 in total

1.  Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 Women.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Jafi A Lipson; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Martin J Yaffe; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Valerie McGuire; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Decrease in breast density in the contralateral normal breast of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: MR imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Ke Nie; Shadfar Bahri; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Fei-Ting Hsu; Han-Ni Shih; Muqing Lin; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Genotypes and haplotypes in the insulin-like growth factors, their receptors and binding proteins in relation to plasma metabolic levels and mammographic density.

Authors:  Margarethe Biong; Inger T Gram; Ilene Brill; Fredrik Johansen; Hiroko K Solvang; Grethe I G Alnaes; Toril Fagerheim; Yngve Bremnes; Stephen J Chanock; Laurie Burdett; Meredith Yeager; Giske Ursin; Vessela N Kristensen
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.063

4.  Physical activity and mammographic density in a cohort of postmenopausal Norwegian women; a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Samera Azeem Qureshi; Merete Ellingjord-Dale; Solveig Hofvind; Anna H Wu; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2012-12-21

5.  Breast cancer susceptibility loci and mammographic density.

Authors:  Rulla M Tamimi; David Cox; Peter Kraft; Graham A Colditz; Susan E Hankinson; David J Hunter
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Different measures of smoking exposure and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yngve Bremnes; Giske Ursin; Nils Bjurstam; Inger T Gram
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.