Literature DB >> 30865217

Reproductive Factors and Mammographic Density: Associations Among 24,840 Women and Comparison of Studies Using Digitized Film-Screen Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography.

Stacey E Alexeeff1, Nnaemeka U Odo2, Russell McBride3, Valerie McGuire4, Ninah Achacoso1, Joseph H Rothstein3,5, Jafi A Lipson6, Rhea Y Liang6, Luana Acton1, Martin J Yaffe7, Alice S Whittemore4,8, Daniel L Rubin6,8, Weiva Sieh3,5, Laurel A Habel1.   

Abstract

Breast density is a modifiable factor that is strongly associated with breast cancer risk. We sought to understand the influence of newer technologies of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) on breast density research and to determine whether results are comparable across studies using FFDM and previous studies using traditional film-screen mammography. We studied 24,840 screening-age (40-74 years) non-Hispanic white women who were participants in the Research Program on Genes, Environment and Health of Kaiser Permanente Northern California and underwent screening mammography with either Hologic (Hologic, Inc., Marlborough, Massachusetts) or General Electric (General Electric Company, Boston, Massachusetts) FFDM machines between 2003 and 2013. We estimated the associations of parity, age at first birth, age at menarche, and menopausal status with percent density and dense area as measured by a single radiological technologist using Cumulus software (Canto Software, Inc., San Francisco, California). We found that associations between reproductive factors and mammographic density measured using processed FFDM images were generally similar in magnitude and direction to those from prior studies using film mammography. Estimated associations for both types of FFDM machines were in the same direction. There was some evidence of heterogeneity in the magnitude of the effect sizes by machine type, which we accounted for using random-effects meta-analysis when combining results. Our findings demonstrate the robustness of quantitative mammographic density measurements across FFDM and film mammography platforms.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; mammographic density; mammography; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30865217      PMCID: PMC6545283          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwz033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  29 in total

1.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Helen Guo; Lisa J Martin; Limei Sun; Jennifer Stone; Eve Fishell; Roberta A Jong; Greg Hislop; Anna Chiarelli; Salomon Minkin; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Reproductive factors related to childbearing and mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Kimberly A Bertrand; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in women over age 70.

Authors:  Francesmary Modugno; Duyen L Ngo; Glenn O Allen; Lewis H Kuller; Roberta B Ness; Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 Women.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Jafi A Lipson; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Martin J Yaffe; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Valerie McGuire; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Reproductive and menstrual factors and mammographic density in African American, Caribbean, and white women.

Authors:  Parisa Tehranifar; Diane Reynolds; Julie Flom; Loralee Fulton; Yuyan Liao; Elizabeth Kudadjie-Gyamfi; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Associations of breast cancer risk factors with breast density in Hispanic women.

Authors:  Susan M Gapstur; Pilar López; Laura A Colangelo; Judith Wolfman; Linda Van Horn; R Edward Hendrick
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to mammographic density: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Francesmary Modugno; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Automated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Celine M Vachon; Christopher G Scott; Thomas A Sellers; John J Heine
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Erin Ee Fowler; Gail Tiffenberg; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Thomas A Sellers; John J Heine
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  Alcohol and Tobacco Use in Relation to Mammographic Density in 23,456 Women.

Authors:  Laurel A Habel; Weiva Sieh; Russell B McBride; Kezhen Fei; Joseph H Rothstein; Stacey E Alexeeff; Xiaoyu Song; Lori C Sakoda; Valerie McGuire; Ninah Achacoso; Luana Acton; Rhea Y Liang; Jafi A Lipson; Martin J Yaffe; Daniel L Rubin; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Benign breast disease and changes in mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Laura L Reimers; Mandy Goldberg; Parisa Tehranifar; Karin B Michels; Barbara A Cohn; Julie D Flom; Ying Wei; Piera Cirillo; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 3.  The epidemiologic factors associated with breast density: A review.

Authors:  Dong-Man Ye; Tao Yu
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Biomarkers of mammographic density in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Mathilde His; Martin Lajous; Liliana Gómez-Flores-Ramos; Adriana Monge; Laure Dossus; Vivian Viallon; Audrey Gicquiau; Carine Biessy; Marc J Gunter; Sabina Rinaldi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 6.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.