| Literature DB >> 28686201 |
Erin D Lewis1,2, Caroline Richard3, Susan Goruk4, Emily Wadge5, Jonathan M Curtis6, René L Jacobs7, Catherine J Field8.
Abstract
Study objectives were to examine the impact of feeding a mixture of choline forms, or a diet high in glycerophosphocholine (GPC) on maternal immune function and offspring growth during lactation. Lactating Sprague-Dawley rat dams (n = 6/diet) were randomized to one of three diets, providing 1 g/kg total choline: Control (100% free choline (FC)), Mixed Choline (MC; 50% phosphatidylcholine (PC), 25% FC, 25% GPC), or High GPC (HGPC; 75% GPC, 12.5% PC, 12.5% FC). At 3 weeks, cell phenotypes and cytokine production with Concanavalin A (ConA)-or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated splenocytes and mesenteric lymphocytes were measured. Feeding MC or HGPC diets improved pups' growth compared to Control (+22% body weight, p < 0.05). In spleen, MC-and HGPC-fed dams had higher proportions of cytotoxic (CD8+) T cells expressing CD27, CD71 and CD127, total B cells (CD45RA+) and dendritic cells (OX6+OX62+), and produced less IL-6 and IFN-γ after ConA than Control-fed dams (p < 0.05). MC and HGPC LPS-stimulated splenocytes produced less IL-1β and IL-6 than Control. ConA-stimulated mesenteric lymphocytes from MC and HGPC dams produced more IL-2 and IFN-γ than Control (p < 0.05). In summary, feeding a mixture of choline forms during lactation improved offspring growth and resulted in a more efficient maternal immune response following mitogenic immune challenge.Entities:
Keywords: glycerophosphocholine; immunology; mesenteric lymph nodes; phosphatidylcholine; spleen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28686201 PMCID: PMC5537828 DOI: 10.3390/nu9070713
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition of experimental diets 1.
| Component (g/kg Diet) | Control Diet | MC Diet | HGPC Diet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Casein | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Starch | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Sucrose | 126 | 126 | 126 |
| Vitamin mix (AIN-93-Vx) 2 | 19 | 19 | 19 |
| Mineral mix 3 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Calcium phosphate dibasic | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| Inositol | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Cellulose | 80.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 |
| 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | |
| Fat mixture | |||
| Canola oil | 40 | 31 | 39 |
| Olive oil | 13 | 13.8 | 8.5 |
| Vegetable oil | 14 | 14 | 14.3 |
| Corn oil | 73 | 65 | 71.9 |
| Sunflower oil | 2 | 5 | 2.8 |
| Flax seed oil | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Hydrogenated canola oil | 56 | 57.5 | 56 |
| DHAsco | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| ARAsco | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Choline mixture (providing 1 g of total choline/kg diet) | |||
| Soy lecithin (PC) | 0 | 13.1 | 3.2 |
| Choline bitartrate | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| Glycerophosphocholine | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.9 |
GPC, glycerophosphocholine; LysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; PC, phosphatidylcholine. 1 All ingredients were purchased from Harlan Teklad (Indianapolis, IN, USA), with the exception of the dietary oils that were all purchased from Safeway (Edmonton, AB, Canada). The hydrogenated canola oil was donated by Richardson Oilseed Limited (Lethbridge, AB, Canada) and ARAsco and DHAsco were donated by DSM (Nutritional Products, Columbia, MD, USA); 2 AIN-93-VX Vitamin mix [7]; 3 Bernhart–Tomarelli salt mixture [19].
Anthropometric data of lactating dams fed Control (100% FC), Mixed Choline (MC; 50% PC, 25% FC, 25% GPC) or High GPC (HGPC; 75% GPC, 12.5% PC, 12.5% FC) diets at the end of study period, 21 days postnatal.
| Control ( | MC ( | HGPC ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 302 ± 11 | 322 ± 9 | 318 ± 5 | 0.284 |
| Spleen weight (g) | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.05 | 0.79 ± 0.02 | 0.385 |
| Splenocytes/g spleen (×106) | 275 ± 14.9 | 220 ± 12.1 | 296 ± 20.3 | 0.086 |
| Mesenteric lymphocytes/animal (×106) | 6.3 ± 0.8 | 8.0 ± 0.7 | 6.3 ± 0.8 | 0.169 |
| Liver weight (g) | 14.6 ± 1.4 | 16.7 ± 0.8 | 15.1 ± 0.5 | 0.285 |
| Intestine length (cm) | 139 ± 4 | 145 ± 3 | 141 ± 2 | 0.339 |
| Food Intake (g/day) | 47 ± 3 | 46 ± 1 | 47 ± 1 | 0.395 |
| Average pup weight (g) | 60 ± 3 b | 74 ± 3 a | 72 ± 3 a | 0.007 |
FC, free choline; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; LysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; PC, phosphatidylcholine. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. p value of the main effect of diet analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons between diet groups have been performed with Duncan adjustment. Means within a row that do not share a common superscript letters a, b are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Choline-containing metabolites in splenocytes of lactating dams fed Control (100% FC), Mixed Choline (MC; 50% PC, 25% FC, 25% GPC) or High GPC (HGPC; 75% GPC, 12.5% PC, 12.5% FC) diets.
| Choline-Containing Metabolite (µg/mg Protein) | Control ( | MC ( | HGPC ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC | 19.3 ± 1.6 | 18.4 ± 1.8 | 15.4 ± 1.4 | 0.205 |
| Free choline | 0.45 ± 0.04 | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.56 ± 0.07 | 0.232 |
| GPC | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 0.52 ± 0.13 | 0.084 |
| LysoPC | 0.36 ± 0.04 b | 1.10 ± 0.1 a | 1.07 ± 0.1 a | 0.0001 |
| Sphingomyelin | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 0.176 |
| Phosphocholine | 1.1 ± 0.04 b | 1.5 ± 0.04 a | 1.3 ± 0.06 b | 0.0015 |
| Total choline (µg/mg protein) | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 0.669 |
FC, free choline; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; LysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; PC, phosphatidylcholine. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. p value of the main effect of diet analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons between diet groups have been performed with Duncan adjustment. Means within a row that do not share a common superscript letters a, b are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Splenocyte phenotypes of lactating dams fed Control (100% FC), Mixed Choline (MC; 50% PC, 25% FC, 25% GPC) or High GPC (HGPC; 75% GPC, 12.5% PC, 12.5% FC) diets.
| Cell Phenotype | Control ( | MC ( | HGPC ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of total lymphocytes | ||||
| Total CD3+ (T cell) | 44.6 ± 1.8 | 40.9 ± 1.8 | 36.9 ± 3.5 | 0.167 |
| % of CD3+ cells | ||||
| CD4+ | 59.3 ± 1.7 a | 57.5 ± 4.6 a | 51.1 ± 2.7 b | 0.011 |
| CD8+ | 34.8 ± 0.9 | 32.1 ± 1.5 | 36.1 ± 1.7 | 0.164 |
| % of CD4+ T cells | ||||
| CD27+ | 73.7 ± 9.5 | 81.8 ± 2.7 | 86.3 ± 2.8 | 0.342 |
| CD28+ | 84.2 ± 6.1 b | 98.9 ± 0.6 a | 94.7 ± 1.7 ab | 0.035 |
| CD71+ | 6.9 ± 1.1 b | 11.1 ± 1.0 a | 13.4 ± 1.2 a | 0.041 |
| CD127+ | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 0.558 |
| % of CD8+ T cells | ||||
| CD27+ | 79.3 ± 8.1 b | 98.2 ± 1.3 a | 99.7 ± 0.2 a | 0.013 |
| CD28+ | 71.7 ± 6.3 | 74.1 ± 1.4 | 69.1 ± 2.4 | 0.683 |
| CD71+ | 7.9 ± 0.8 b | 13.2 ± 0.9 ab | 16.4 ± 3.2 a | 0.023 |
| CD127+ | 3.9 ± 0.9 b | 5.1 ± 0.3 a | 8.2 ± 1.2 a | 0.011 |
| % of total lymphocytes | ||||
| CD68+CD284+ | 8.3 ± 0.3 ab | 7.9 ± 0.2 b | 9.0 ± 0.3 a | 0.045 |
| OX62+OX6+ (Dendritic cell) | 4.4 ± 1.1 b | 8.6 ± 0.5 a | 9.2 ± 0.6 a | 0.001 |
| Total CD45RA+ (B cells) | 30.7 ± 1.0 b | 40.4 ± 1.3 a | 39.1 ± 4.7 a | 0.034 |
| CD80+CD45RA+ | 4.8 ± 0.5 a | 2.9 ± 0.2 b | 3.7 ± 0.2 b | 0.004 |
| IgA+ | 12.1 ± 0.6 | 12.1 ± 0.3 | 13.6 ± 0.6 | 0.105 |
| IgG+ | 10.4 ± 1.1 a | 5.4 ± 0.8 b | 3.2 ± 0.2 b | 0.0003 |
| IgM+ | 49.6 ± 1.5 b | 55.2 ± 0.8 a | 53.1 ± 1.9 ab | 0.045 |
FC, free choline; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; LysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; PC, phosphatidylcholine. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. p value of the main effect of diet analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons between diet groups have been performed with Duncan adjustment. Means within a row that do not share a common superscript letters a, b are significantly different (p < 0.05). The following phenotypes not shown in table were not significantly different among groups (mean ± SEM, % of total cells, n = 18): CD4+CD25+, 7.0 ± 0.5; CD8+CD25+, 4.7 ± 0.5; CD4+CD152+, 2.7 ± 1.1; CD8+CD152+, 8.4 ± 1.2; CD3-CD161+, 2.5 ± 0.3; CD3+CD161+, 0.8 ± 0.2; OX6+OX12+, 26.3 ± 1.6; OX6+CD80+, 4.9 ± 0.6; OX12+CD80+, 4.4 ± 0.5; CD27+CD45RA+, 2.8 ± 0.7.
Mesenteric lymphocyte phenotypes of lactating dams fed Control (100% FC), Mixed Choline (MC; 50% PC, 25% FC, 25% GPC) or High GPC (HGPC; 75% GPC, 12.5% PC, 12.5% FC) diets.
| Cell Phenotype | Control ( | MC ( | HGPC ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of total lymphocytes | ||||
| Total CD3+ (T cell) | 57.0 ± 1.6 | 58.5 ± 1.1 | 60.3 ± 1.5 | 0.278 |
| % of CD3+ cells | ||||
| CD4+ | 69.3 ± 0.6 | 70.1 ± 1.4 | 66.0 ± 1.4 | 0.061 |
| CD8+ | 26.0 ± 1.6 | 26.5 ± 3.8 | 22.4 ± 3.7 | 0.628 |
| % of CD4+ T cells | ||||
| CD71+ | 6.2 ± 0.9 | 5.5 ± 0.8 | 6.8 ± 0.6 | 0.484 |
| CD127+ | 0.73 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 1.2 | 0.215 |
| CD152+ (CTLA-4+) | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 0.433 |
| % of CD8+ T cells | ||||
| CD71+ | 7.0 ± 0.7 | 7.9 ± 1.3 | 5.7 ± 0.5 | 0.258 |
| CD127+ | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.5 | 0.104 |
| CD152+ (CTLA-4+) | 5.7 ± 0.5 b | 5.4 ± 0.4 ab | 7.9 ± 0.6 a | 0.005 |
| % of total lymphocytes | ||||
| Total CD45RA+ (B cells) | 26.8 ± 1.3 | 36.1 ± 1.3 | 33.7 ± 0.1 | 0.554 |
| IgA+ | 4.3 ± 0.6 a | 1.6 ± 0.1 b | 2.3 ± 0.3b | 0.001 |
| IgG+ | 6.0 ± 0.9 a | 3.4 ± 0.2 b | 5.3 ± 0.5 ab | 0.024 |
| IgM+ | 38.7 ± 1.9 | 32.1 ± 2.9 | 37.4 ± 1.6 | 0.335 |
FC, free choline; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; LysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; PC, phosphatidylcholine. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. p value of the main effect of diet analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons between diet groups have been performed with Duncan adjustment. Means within a row that do not share a common superscript letters a, b are significantly different (p < 0.05). The following phenotypes not shown in table were not significantly different among groups (mean ± SEM, % of total cells, n = 18); CD4+CD25+, 7.8 ± 0.9; CD4+CD27+, 62.3 ± 1.5; CD4+CD28+, 70.1 ± 3.6; CD8+CD25+, 4.0 ± 0.4; CD8+CD27+, 66.3 ± 2.5; CD8+28+, 65.1 ± 4.0.
Figure 1Cytokine production by splenocytes after ex vivo stimulation with Concanavalin A (ConA) (a) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS); (b) from lactating dams fed Control (100% FC) (n = 6), Mixed Choline (MC; 50% PC, 25% FC, 25% GPC) (n = 6) or High GPC (HGPC; 75% GPC, 12.5% PC, 12.5% FC) (n = 6) diets. FC, free choline; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; PC, phosphatidylcholine. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. p value of the main effect of diet analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons between diet groups have been performed with Duncan adjustment. Means within a row that do not share a common superscript letters a, b are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 2IL-2 production (a) and cytokine production; (b) by mesenteric lymphocytes after ex vivo stimulation with Concanavalin A (ConA) from lactating dams fed Control (100% FC) (n = 6), Mixed Choline (MC; 50% PC, 25% FC, 25% GPC) (n = 6) or High GPC (HGPC; 75% GPC, 12.5% PC, 12.5% FC) (n = 6) diets. FC, free choline; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; PC, phosphatidylcholine. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. p value of the main effect of diet analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons between diet groups have been performed with Duncan adjustment. Means within a row that do not share a common superscript letters a, b are significantly different (p < 0.05).