| Literature DB >> 28684984 |
Maryna V Murlykina1,2, Maryna N Kornet3, Sergey M Desenko1,4, Svetlana V Shishkina1,4, Oleg V Shishkin1, Aleksander A Brazhko3, Vladimir I Musatov1, Erik V Van der Eycken2, Valentin A Chebanov1,2,4.
Abstract
The well-known aminoazoles, 3-amino-5-methylisoxazole and 5-amino-N-aryl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamides, were studied as an amine component in Ugi and Groebke-Blackburn-Bienaymé multicomponent reactions. The first example of an application of aminoazoles in an Ugi four-component reaction was discovered and novel features of a Groebke-Blackburn-Bienaymé cyclocondensation are established and discussed. The heterocycles obtained were evaluated for their antibacterial activity and several of them demonstrated a weak antimicrobial effect, but for most of the compounds a 30-50% increase in biomass of Gram-positive strains (mainly B. subtilis) compared to control was observed.Entities:
Keywords: 3-amino-5-methylisoxazole; 5-amino-N-aryl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamides; Groebke–Blackburn–Bienaymé reaction; antibacterial activity; isocyanide Ugi reaction
Year: 2017 PMID: 28684984 PMCID: PMC5480327 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.13.104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Scheme 1Aminoazoles in GBB-3CR and Ugi-4CR.
Scheme 2Reactivity of 5-amino-N-aryl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide and 3-amino-5-methylisoxazole in GBB-3CR and Ugi-4CR.
CBB-3CR involving tert-butylisocyanide.
| Entry | Starting materials | Method | Product | Yield, % | |||
| Aldehydes | R1 | Aminopyrazoles | R2 | ||||
| 1 | H | 4-F | A | 54 | |||
| 2 | 2-CH3O | 4-F | A | 75 | |||
| 3 | 3-CH3O | 4-F | A | 77 | |||
| 4 | 4-CH3O | 4-F | A | 75 | |||
| 5 | 4-Cl | 4-F | A | 72 | |||
| 6 | 2-CH3O | 3-F | A | 83 | |||
| 7 | 4-CH3O | 3-F | A | 64 | |||
| 8 | 4-Cl | 3-F | A | 89 | |||
| 9 | 2-CH3O | 2-CH2CH3 | A | 82 | |||
| 10 | 4-CH3O | 2-CH2CH3 | A | 64 | |||
| 11 | 4-Cl | 2-CH2CH3 | A | 66 | |||
| 12 | 2-CH3O | 4-CH2CH3 | A | 85 | |||
| 13 | 4-Cl | 4-CH2CH3 | A | 53 | |||
| 14 | 4-CO2CH3 | 4-F | B | 85 | |||
| 15 | 4-NO2 | 4-F | B | 87 | |||
| 16 | 4-CN | 4-F | B | 90 | |||
| 17 | 4-CO2CH3 | 3-F | B | 88 | |||
| 18 | 4-NO2 | 3-F | B | 87 | |||
| 19 | 4-CN | 3-F | B | 82 | |||
| 20 | 4-CO2CH3 | 2-CH2CH3 | B | 61 | |||
| 21 | 4-NO2 | 2-CH2CH3 | B | 79 | |||
| 22 | 4-CN | 2-CH2CH3 | B | 83 | |||
Optimization of the reaction conditions for the synthesis of compound 4q.
| Entry | Solvent, acid | Time, hours | Products (ratio) | Yield, %a | |
| 1 | TFE, HClO4, (10 mol %) | 72 | 25 | – | |
| 2 | EtOH/H2O (1:1), TFA, (10 mol %) | 24 | 25 | – | |
| 3 | EtOH/H2O (1:1), TFA, (20 mol %) | 24 | 25 | – | |
| 4 | EtOH/H2O (1:1), TFA, (10 mol %) | 12 | 80 | – | |
| 5 | EtOH/H2O (1:1), TFA, (10 mol %) | 0.3b | 140 | – | |
| 6 | EtOH/H2O (1:1), TFA, (10 mol %) | 2c | 25 | – | |
| 7 | EtOH/H2O (1:1), TFA, (10 mol %) | 48 | 85 | 56 | |
| 8 | EtOH/H2O (1:1), TFA, (10 mol %) | 5b | 140 | – | |
| 9 | DMF, HClO4, (10 mol %) | 48 | 25 | 88 | |
aThe yields are indicated for compound 4 and are not calculated for the mixtures; bupon MW irradiation; cupon US irradiation; din a mixture with starting materials and undetected impurities.
Optimization of the reaction conditions for the synthesis of compound 4o.
| Entry | Solvent | Time, hours | Main product | Yield, (%)a | |
| 1 | EtOH/H2O (1:1), TFA, (10 mol %) | 72 | 25 | – | |
| 2 | EtOH/H2O (1:1), TFA, (10 mol %) | 2 | 140c | – | |
| 3 | EtOH/H2O (1:1), TFA, (10 mol %) | 72 | 90 | – | |
| 4 | DMF, HClO4, (10 mol %) | 48 | 25 | 87 | |
aThe yields are indicated for compound 4o; bin a mixture with starting materials and undetected impurities; cupon MW irradiation.
Phenylpyruvic acid in GBB-3CR.
| Entry | Starting materials | Product | Yield, % | |
| Aminopyrazoles | R2 | |||
| 1 | 4-F | 48 | ||
| 2 | 3-F | 42 | ||
GBB-3CR involving ethyl 2-isocyanoacetate.
| Entry | Starting materials | Product | Yield, % | |||
| Aldehydes | R1 | Aminopyrazoles | R2 | |||
| 1 | 4-CH3O | 4-F | 77 | |||
| 2 | 4-Cl | 4-F | 95 | |||
| 3 | 4-CO2CH3 | 4-F | 67 | |||
| 4 | 4-NO2 | 4-F | 85 | |||
| 5 | 4-CH3O | 3-F | 78 | |||
| 6 | 4-Cl | 3-F | 84 | |||
| 7 | 4-CO2CH3 | 3-F | 82 | |||
| 8 | 4-NO2 | 3-F | 80 | |||
Ugi-4CR involving 3-amino-5-methylisoxazole.
| Entry | Starting materials | Product | Yieldb, % | |
| Aldehydes | R1 | |||
| 1 | H | 49 | ||
| 2 | 2-CH3O | 67 | ||
| 3 | 3-CH3O | 51 | ||
| 4 | 4-CH3O | 73 | ||
| 5 | 4-Cl | 43 | ||
| 6 | 4-CO2CH3 | 43 | ||
| 7 | 4-NO2 | –b | ||
| 8 | 4-CN | 18 | ||
a9g was not isolated; bthe yields are indicated for compounds 9.
Figure 1Alternative structures A and B for compounds 4 and 6.
Figure 2Selected data of HSQC and HMBC experiments for compound 4a.
Figure 3Molecular structure of 3-(tert-butylamino)-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[1,2-b]pyrazole-7-carboxamide (4e) (X-ray diffraction data). Non-hydrogen atoms are presented as thermal ellipsoids with 50% probability.
Figure 4Selected data of NOE and HSQC experiments for compound 9d.
Figure 5Molecular structure of N-(2-(tert-butylamino)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-N-(5-methylisoxazol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropiolamide (9e) (X-ray diffraction data). Non-hydrogen atoms are presented as thermal ellipsoids with 50% probability.
Antibacterial activity results.
| Entry | Substance | MICa/MBCb, | Strains of test cultures | |||
| 1 | MIC | 125 | –c | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2 | MIC | 500 | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 3 | MIC | – | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 4 | MIC | – | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 5 | MIC | 500 | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 6 | MIC | – | – | – | –*d | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 7 | MIC | – | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 8 | MIC | 500 | – | – | 500 | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 9 | MIC | 250 | – | – | –* | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 10 | MIC | – | – | –* | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 11 | MIC | – | – | – | –* | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 12 | MIC | – | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 13 | MIC | 500 | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 14 | MIC | – | – | – | –* | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 15 | MIC | 250 | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 16 | MIC | 500 | – | – | –* | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 17 | MIC | – | – | – | –* | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 18 | MIC | – | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 19 | MIC | 500 | 500 | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 20 | MIC | – | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 21 | MIC | – | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 22 | MIC | 500 | – | – | –* | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 23 | MIC | – | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 24 | MIC | 500 | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 25 | MIC | – | – | – | 500 | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 26 | MIC | – | 500 | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 27 | MIC | 500 | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 28 | MIC | 125 | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 29 | MIC | 500 | – | 500 | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 30 | MIC | – | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 31 | MIC | – | – | – | –* | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 32 | MIC | – | – | – | –* | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 33 | MIC | – | – | – | –* | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 34 | MIC | – | – | – | – | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 35 | MIC | – | – | – | –* | |
| MBC | – | – | – | – | ||
| 36 | MIC | 15.6 | 62.5 | 31.25 | 1.9 | |
| MBC | 15.6 | 62.5 | 31.25 | 1.9 | ||
aMIC – minimum inhibitory concentration; bMBC – minimum bactericidal concentration; cthe substance in concentration ≤500 mg/L does not inhibit the culture growth; dincrease in biomass compared to control.