| Literature DB >> 28674527 |
Florine Degrune1,2, Nicolas Theodorakopoulos1, Gilles Colinet3, Marie-Pierre Hiel1,4, Bernard Bodson4, Bernard Taminiau5, Georges Daube5, Micheline Vandenbol1, Martin Hartmann6.
Abstract
Agricultural productivity relies on a wide range of ecosystem services provided by the soil biota. Plowing is a fundamental component of conventional farming, but long-term detrimental effects such as soil erosion and loss of soil organic matter have been recognized. Moving towards more sustainable management practices such as reduced tillage or crop residue retention can reduce these detrimental effects, but will also influence structure and function of the soil microbiota with direct consequences for the associated ecosystem services. Although there is increasing evidence that different tillage regimes alter the soil microbiome, we have a limited understanding of the temporal dynamics of these effects. Here, we used high-throughput sequencing of bacterial and fungal ribosomal markers to explore changes in soil microbial community structure under two contrasting tillage regimes (conventional and reduced tillage) either with or without crop residue retention. Soil samples were collected over the growing season of two crops (Vicia faba and Triticum aestivum) below the seedbed (15-20 cm). Tillage, crop and growing stage were significant determinants of microbial community structure, but the impact of tillage showed only moderate temporal dependency. Whereas the tillage effect on soil bacteria showed some temporal dependency and became less strong at later growing stages, the tillage effect on soil fungi was more consistent over time. Crop residue retention had only a minor influence on the community. Six years after the conversion from conventional to reduced tillage, soil moisture contents and nutrient levels were significantly lower under reduced than under conventional tillage. These changes in edaphic properties were related to specific shifts in microbial community structure. Notably, bacterial groups featuring copiotrophic lifestyles or potentially carrying the ability to degrade more recalcitrant compounds were favored under conventional tillage, whereas taxa featuring more oligotrophic lifestyles were more abundant under reduced tillage. Our study found that, under the specific edaphic and climatic context of central Belgium, different tillage regimes created different ecological niches that select for different microbial lifestyles with potential consequences for the ecosystem services provided to the plants and their environment.Entities:
Keywords: conventional tillage; crop residue management; cropping season; metabarcoding; microbial diversity; reduced tillage
Year: 2017 PMID: 28674527 PMCID: PMC5474472 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Field operations performed on the SOLRESIDUS experiment in 2012 and 2013.
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Operation field | Plot | Date | Operation field | Plot | Date | Operation field | Plot |
| 29/08 | Shallow tillage | All | 18/03 | Weeding | All | 11/03 | Nitrogen fertilization | All |
| 06/09 | Cover crop sowing (mustard) | All | 05/04 | Sowing faba bean | All | 26/03 | All | |
| 13/12 | Plowing | CT | 08/04 | Meadow-emergence weeding | All | 01/04 | Weeding | All |
| 15/04 | All | 15/04 | Nitrogen fertilization | All | ||||
| 24/05 | All | 15/04 | Growth regulator | All | ||||
| 27/06 | All | 25/04 | Weeding | All | ||||
| 08/07 | Chemical pest control | All | 27/04 | Fungicide | All | |||
| 28/08 | Weeding | All | 12/05 | Nitrogen fertilization | All | |||
| 04/09 | Faba bean harvest | All | 16/05 | Weeding | All | |||
| 25/11 | Plowing | CT | 26/05 | All | ||||
| 25/11 | Shallow tillage | All | 06/06 | Fungicide | All | |||
| 25/11 | Sowing winter wheat | All | 04/09 | Winter wheat harvest | All | |||
Effects of tillage regime, crop residue management, crop, and growing season on bacterial and fungal β-diversity.
| Bacteria | Fungi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A) | ||||||
| Tillage | ∗∗ | |||||
| Residue | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 1 |
| Crop | 1.4 | 0.2 | 9 | |||
| Season | ||||||
| Tillage∗season | 1.1 | 0.2 | 3 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 3 |
| s-CT, s-RT | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ||||
| l-CT, l-RT | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ||||
| f-CT, f-RT | ∗ | ∗∗ | ||||
| t-CT, t-RT | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ||||
| g-CT, g-RT | 1.1 | 0.1 | 69.3 | ∗∗∗ | ||
Effects of tillage regime, crop residue management, crop, and growing season on bacterial and fungal α-diversity.
| Bacteria | Fungi | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main test | Richness (sobs) | Evenness (sw) | Richness (sobs) | Evenness (sw) |
| Tillage | 3.6 (0.06) | |||
| Residue | 0.08 (0.8) | 0.8 (0.4) | 0.5 (0.5) | 2.2 (0.1) |
| Crop | 3.6 (0.06) | 0.1 (0.7) | ||
| Season | 1.6 (0.2) | |||
| Tillage∗season | 0.6 (0.6) | 0.8 (0.5) | 2.0 (0.1) | 1.5 (0.2) |
Effects of tillage regime, crop residue management, and growing season on soil physical and chemical soil properties.