Literature DB >> 28665812

Interventions to increase uptake of faecal tests for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.

Cédric Rat1,2, Chloé Latour1, Rosalie Rousseau1, Aurélie Gaultier3, Corinne Pogu4, Adrian Edwards5, Jean-Michel Nguyen2,3.   

Abstract

International guidelines promote screening by faecal tests in asymptomatic individuals at average risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but uptake does not reach recommended levels in most countries. The aim of this study was to synthetize evidence on (a) interventions aiming to increase uptake of faecal tests for CRC screening, in asymptomatic individuals at average risk of CRC, (b) interventions that targeted general practitioner (GP) involvement and (c) interventions that targeted nonresponders or disadvantaged groups. A systematic review of randomized-controlled trials, searching PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library database, based on the Cochrane's Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 guidelines was performed. The risk of bias of included trials was assessed. From 24 included RCTs, the following interventions increase uptake of faecal tests: advance notification letter (OR 1.20-1.51), postal mailing (OR 1.31-7.70), telephone contacts with an advisor (OR 1.36-7.72). Three interventions showed positive effects of GP involvement such as a GP-signed invitation letter [odds ratio (OR)=1.26], GP communication training (OR=1.22) or mailing reminders to GPs (OR=14.8). Inconclusive results were found for studies comparing different types of faecal tests and those testing the effectiveness of providing various types of written information. Advance notification letters, postal mailing of the faecal tests, written reminders and telephone contacts with an advisor increase patient uptake of faecal tests. There was only limited evidence on the effect of GP involvement on screening test uptake and a lack of studies focusing on nonresponders or disadvantaged groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28665812     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  16 in total

1.  Mailed FIT (fecal immunochemical test), navigation or patient reminders? Using microsimulation to inform selection of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening in Medicaid enrollees.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Siddhartha Nambiar; Maria E Mayorga; Eliana Sullivan; Karen Hicklin; Meghan C O'Leary; Kristen Dillon; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Yifan Gu; Bonnie K Lind; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Effect of Physician Notification Regarding Nonadherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening on Patient Participation in Fecal Immunochemical Test Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Cédric Rat; Corinne Pogu; Delphine Le Donné; Chloé Latour; Gaelle Bianco; France Nanin; Anne Cowppli-Bony; Aurélie Gaultier; Jean-Michel Nguyen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening among Adults Who Have Never Been Screened: Testing the Interaction between Message Framing and Tailored Risk Feedback.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Constance Johnson; Sathya Amarasekara; Wei Pan; John A Updegraff
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-04-08

4.  Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Amanda F Petrik; Edward J Miech; Brittany Younger; Anne L Escaron; Jennifer S Rivelli; Jamie H Thompson; Denis Nyongesa; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  A qualitative study of patient preferences for prompts and reminders for a direct-mail fecal testing program.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Rose Gunn; Jennifer S Rivelli; Katherine A Vaughn; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Population health interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical tests: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Patrick Avila; Evans Whitaker; Stephen Bent; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.

Authors:  Martin O'Flaherty; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Simon Capewell; Angela Boland; Michelle Maden; Brendan Collins; Piotr Bandosz; Lirije Hyseni; Chris Kypridemos
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Gloria D Coronado; Keith Argenbright; Alison T Brenner; Sheila F Castañeda; Jason A Dominitz; Beverly Green; Rachel B Issaka; Theodore R Levin; Daniel S Reuland; Lisa C Richardson; Douglas J Robertson; Amit G Singal; Michael Pignone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 286.130

9.  Participation in faecal immunochemical testing-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in the northwest of Europe.

Authors:  Esther Toes-Zoutendijk; Isabel Portillo; Sarah Hoeck; Isabel de Brabander; Philippe Perrin; Catherine Dubois; Monique van Leerdam; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marc Bardou
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 10.  What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Rachel B Issaka; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.