Literature DB >> 28663070

Poetry in motion: Increased chromosomal mobility after DNA damage.

Michael J Smith1, Rodney Rothstein2.   

Abstract

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most lethal DNA lesions, and a variety of pathways have evolved to manage their repair in a timely fashion. One such pathway is homologous recombination (HR), in which information from an undamaged donor site is used as a template for repair. Although many of the biochemical steps of HR are known, the physical movements of chromosomes that must underlie the pairing of homologous sequence during mitotic DSB repair have remained mysterious. Recently, several groups have begun to use a variety of genetic and cell biological tools to study this important question. These studies reveal that both damaged and undamaged loci increase the volume of the nuclear space that they explore after the formation of DSBs. This DSB-induced increase in chromosomal mobility is regulated by many of the same factors that are important during HR, such as ATR-dependent checkpoint activation and the recombinase Rad51, suggesting that this phenomenon may facilitate the search for homology. In this perspective, we review current research into the mobility of chromosomal loci during HR, as well as possible underlying mechanisms, and discuss the critical questions that remain to be answered. Although we focus primarily on recent studies in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, examples of experiments performed in higher eukaryotes are also included, which reveal that increased mobility of damaged loci is a process conserved throughout evolution.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-strand breaks; Global chromosomal mobility; Homologous recombination; Homology search; Local chromosomal mobility; Nuclear organization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28663070      PMCID: PMC5567867          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  65 in total

1.  Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins.

Authors:  Michael Lisby; Jacqueline H Barlow; Rebecca C Burgess; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Chromatin mobility is increased at sites of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  P M Krawczyk; T Borovski; J Stap; T Cijsouw; R ten Cate; J P Medema; R Kanaar; N A P Franken; J A Aten
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Evidence for a dual role of actin in regulating chromosome organization and dynamics in yeast.

Authors:  Maya Spichal; Alice Brion; Sébastien Herbert; Axel Cournac; Martial Marbouty; Christophe Zimmer; Romain Koszul; Emmanuelle Fabre
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Cohesin and the nucleolus constrain the mobility of spontaneous repair foci.

Authors:  Vincent Dion; Véronique Kalck; Andrew Seeber; Thomas Schleker; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Histone degradation in response to DNA damage enhances chromatin dynamics and recombination rates.

Authors:  Michael H Hauer; Andrew Seeber; Vijender Singh; Raphael Thierry; Ragna Sack; Assaf Amitai; Mariya Kryzhanovska; Jan Eglinger; David Holcman; Tom Owen-Hughes; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair.

Authors:  Irene Chiolo; Aki Minoda; Serafin U Colmenares; Aris Polyzos; Sylvain V Costes; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase.

Authors:  M Lisby; R Rothstein; U H Mortensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Replication factor-A from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is encoded by three essential genes coordinately expressed at S phase.

Authors:  S J Brill; B Stillman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Rad51 is an accessory factor for Dmc1-mediated joint molecule formation during meiosis.

Authors:  Veronica Cloud; Yuen-Ling Chan; Jennifer Grubb; Brian Budke; Douglas K Bishop
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  A role for nuclear envelope-bridging complexes in homology-directed repair.

Authors:  Rebecca K Swartz; Elisa C Rodriguez; Megan C King
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.138

View more
  10 in total

1.  Maintenance of Genome Integrity by Mi2 Homologs CHD-3 and LET-418 in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Carolyn A Turcotte; Solomon A Sloat; Julia A Rigothi; Erika Rosenkranse; Alexandra L Northrup; Nicolas P Andrews; Paula M Checchi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Polymer perspective of genome mobilization.

Authors:  Colleen J Lawrimore; Josh Lawrimore; Yunyan He; Sergio Chavez; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Modified chromosome structure caused by phosphomimetic H2A modulates the DNA damage response by increasing chromatin mobility in yeast.

Authors:  Fabiola García Fernández; Brenda Lemos; Yasmine Khalil; Renaud Batrin; James E Haber; Emmanuelle Fabre
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  Assembling nuclear domains: Lessons from DNA repair.

Authors:  Benjamin Schrank; Jean Gautier
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 5.  The Secret Life of Chromosome Loops upon DNA Double-Strand Break.

Authors:  Coline Arnould; Gaëlle Legube
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  DNA damage triggers increased mobility of chromosomes in G1-phase cells.

Authors:  Michael J Smith; Eric E Bryant; Fraulin J Joseph; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Global chromatin mobility induced by a DSB is dictated by chromosomal conformation and defines the HR outcome.

Authors:  Fabiola García Fernández; Etienne Almayrac; Ànnia Carré Simon; Renaud Batrin; Yasmine Khalil; Michel Boissac; Emmanuelle Fabre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Increased chromosomal mobility after DNA damage is controlled by interactions between the recombination machinery and the checkpoint.

Authors:  Michael J Smith; Eric E Bryant; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  DNA damage checkpoint activation impairs chromatin homeostasis and promotes mitotic catastrophe during aging.

Authors:  Matthew M Crane; Adam E Russell; Brent J Schafer; Ben W Blue; Riley Whalen; Jared Almazan; Mung Gi Hong; Bao Nguyen; Joslyn E Goings; Kenneth L Chen; Ryan Kelly; Matt Kaeberlein
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Comparison of High- and Low-LET Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Break Processing in Living Cells.

Authors:  Stefan J Roobol; Irene van den Bent; Wiggert A van Cappellen; Tsion E Abraham; Maarten W Paul; Roland Kanaar; Adriaan B Houtsmuller; Dik C van Gent; Jeroen Essers
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.