Literature DB >> 22328517

Chromatin mobility is increased at sites of DNA double-strand breaks.

P M Krawczyk1, T Borovski, J Stap, T Cijsouw, R ten Cate, J P Medema, R Kanaar, N A P Franken, J A Aten.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can efficiently kill cancer cells, but they can also produce unwanted chromosome rearrangements when DNA ends from different DSBs are erroneously joined. Movement of DSB-containing chromatin domains might facilitate these DSB interactions and promote the formation of chromosome rearrangements. Therefore, we analyzed the mobility of chromatin domains containing DSBs, marked by the fluorescently tagged DSB marker 53BP1, in living mammalian cells and compared it with the mobility of undamaged chromatin on a time-scale relevant for DSB repair. We found that chromatin domains containing DSBs are substantially more mobile than intact chromatin, and are capable of roaming a more than twofold larger area of the cell nucleus. Moreover, this increased DSB mobility, but not the mobility of undamaged chromatin, can be reduced by agents that affect higher-order chromatin organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22328517     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.089847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  64 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of recombination and genomic maintenance.

Authors:  Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  DNA damage signalling targets the kinetochore to promote chromatin mobility.

Authors:  Jonathan Strecker; Gagan D Gupta; Wei Zhang; Mikhail Bashkurov; Marie-Claude Landry; Laurence Pelletier; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  DNA double-strand breaks: linking gene expression to chromosome morphology and mobility.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Dieter W Heermann
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Topokaryotyping demonstrates single cell variability and stress dependent variations in nuclear envelope associated domains.

Authors:  Anamarija Jurisic; Chloé Robin; Pavel Tarlykov; Lee Siggens; Brigitte Schoell; Anna Jauch; Karl Ekwall; Claus Storgaard Sørensen; Marc Lipinski; Muhammad Shoaib; Vasily Ogryzko
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Nanoscale histone localization in live cells reveals reduced chromatin mobility in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Pierre-Alexandre Vidi; Sophie A Lelièvre; Joseph M K Irudayaraj
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 6.  Nuclear Dynamics of Heterochromatin Repair.

Authors:  Nuno Amaral; Taehyun Ryu; Xiao Li; Irene Chiolo
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Histone degradation in response to DNA damage enhances chromatin dynamics and recombination rates.

Authors:  Michael H Hauer; Andrew Seeber; Vijender Singh; Raphael Thierry; Ragna Sack; Assaf Amitai; Mariya Kryzhanovska; Jan Eglinger; David Holcman; Tom Owen-Hughes; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 8.  Dynamics of the DNA damage response: insights from live-cell imaging.

Authors:  Ketki Karanam; Alexander Loewer; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Poetry in motion: Increased chromosomal mobility after DNA damage.

Authors:  Michael J Smith; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 10.  Chromatin remodeling at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Brendan D Price; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.