Literature DB >> 28656622

A population level atlas of Mus musculus craniofacial skeleton and automated image-based shape analysis.

A Murat Maga1,2, Nicholas J Tustison3, Brian B Avants4.   

Abstract

Laboratory mice are staples for evo/devo and genetics studies. Inbred strains provide a uniform genetic background to manipulate and understand gene-environment interactions, while their crosses have been instrumental in studies of genetic architecture, integration and modularity, and mapping of complex biological traits. Recently, there have been multiple large-scale studies of laboratory mice to further our understanding of the developmental basis, evolution, and genetic control of shape variation in the craniofacial skeleton (i.e. skull and mandible). These experiments typically use micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to capture the craniofacial phenotype in 3D and rely on manually annotated anatomical landmarks to conduct statistical shape analysis. Although the common choice for imaging modality and phenotyping provides the potential for collaborative research for even larger studies with more statistical power, the investigator (or lab-specific) nature of the data collection hampers these efforts. Investigators are rightly concerned that subtle differences in how anatomical landmarks were recorded will create systematic bias between studies that will eventually influence scientific findings. Even if researchers are willing to repeat landmark annotation on a combined dataset, different lab practices and software choices may create obstacles for standardization beyond the underlying imaging data. Here, we propose a freely available analysis system that could assist in the standardization of micro-CT studies in the mouse. Our proposal uses best practices developed in biomedical imaging and takes advantage of existing open-source software and imaging formats. Our first contribution is the creation of a synthetic template for the adult mouse craniofacial skeleton from 25 inbred strains and five F1 crosses that are widely used in biological research. The template contains a fully segmented cranium, left and right hemi-mandibles, endocranial space, and the first few cervical vertebrae. We have been using this template in our lab to segment and isolate cranial structures in an automated fashion from a mixed population of mice, including craniofacial mutants, aged 4-12.5 weeks. As a secondary contribution, we demonstrate an application of nearly automated shape analysis, using symmetric diffeomorphic image registration. This approach, which we call diGPA, closely approximates the popular generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) but negates the collection of anatomical landmarks. We achieve our goals by using the open-source advanced normalization tools (ANT) image quantification library, as well as its associated R library (ANTsR) for statistical image analysis. Finally, we make a plea to investigators to commit to using open imaging standards and software in their labs to the extent possible to increase the potential for data exchange and improve the reproducibility of findings. Future work will incorporate more anatomical detail (such as individual cranial bones, turbinals, dentition, middle ear ossicles) and more diversity into the template.
© 2017 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  geometrics morphometrics; image processing; image-based shape analysis; landmarking; microCT; segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28656622      PMCID: PMC5554826          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  35 in total

1.  Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing Api: a technical report on ITK--the Insight Toolkit.

Authors:  Terry S Yoo; Michael J Ackerman; William E Lorensen; Will Schroeder; Vikram Chalana; Stephen Aylward; Dimitris Metaxas; Ross Whitaker
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

2.  Evaluation of registration methods on thoracic CT: the EMPIRE10 challenge.

Authors:  Keelin Murphy; Bram van Ginneken; Joseph M Reinhardt; Sven Kabus; Kai Ding; Xiang Deng; Kunlin Cao; Kaifang Du; Gary E Christensen; Vincent Garcia; Tom Vercauteren; Nicholas Ayache; Olivier Commowick; Grégoire Malandain; Ben Glocker; Nikos Paragios; Nassir Navab; Vladlena Gorbunova; Jon Sporring; Marleen de Bruijne; Xiao Han; Mattias P Heinrich; Julia A Schnabel; Mark Jenkinson; Cristian Lorenz; Marc Modat; Jamie R McClelland; Sébastien Ourselin; Sascha E A Muenzing; Max A Viergever; Dante De Nigris; D Louis Collins; Tal Arbel; Marta Peroni; Rui Li; Gregory C Sharp; Alexander Schmidt-Richberg; Jan Ehrhardt; René Werner; Dirk Smeets; Dirk Loeckx; Gang Song; Nicholas Tustison; Brian Avants; James C Gee; Marius Staring; Stefan Klein; Berend C Stoel; Martin Urschler; Manuel Werlberger; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Simon Rit; David Sarrut; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  C P Klingenberg; L J Leamy; E J Routman; J M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Use of a natural hybrid zone for genomewide association mapping of craniofacial traits in the house mouse.

Authors:  Luisa F Pallares; Bettina Harr; Leslie M Turner; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Genetic structure of phenotypic robustness in the collaborative cross mouse diallel panel.

Authors:  P N Gonzalez; M Pavlicev; P Mitteroecker; F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; R A Spritz; R S Marcucio; B Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  A robust comparison of biological shapes.

Authors:  A F Siegel; R H Benson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Genetics of murine craniofacial morphology: diallel analysis of the eight founders of the Collaborative Cross.

Authors:  Christopher J Percival; Denise K Liberton; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Richard Spritz; Ralph Marcucio; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Waxholm space: an image-based reference for coordinating mouse brain research.

Authors:  G Allan Johnson; Alexandra Badea; Jeffrey Brandenburg; Gary Cofer; Boma Fubara; Song Liu; Jonathan Nissanov
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Does 3D Phenotyping Yield Substantial Insights in the Genetics of the Mouse Mandible Shape?

Authors:  Nicolas Navarro; A Murat Maga
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Genome-wide analysis reveals a complex pattern of genomic imprinting in mice.

Authors:  Jason B Wolf; James M Cheverud; Charles Roseman; Reinmar Hager
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  8 in total

1.  A Registration and Deep Learning Approach to Automated Landmark Detection for Geometric Morphometrics.

Authors:  Jay Devine; Jose D Aponte; David C Katz; Wei Liu; Lucas D Lo Vercio; Nils D Forkert; Ralph Marcucio; Christopher J Percival; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.119

2.  The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.

Authors:  Christopher J Percival; Jay Devine; Benjamin C Darwin; Wei Liu; Matthijs van Eede; R Mark Henkelman; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  ALPACA: A fast and accurate computer vision approach for automated landmarking of three-dimensional biological structures.

Authors:  Arthur Porto; Sara Rolfe; A Murat Maga
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 8.335

4.  MusMorph, a database of standardized mouse morphology data for morphometric meta-analyses.

Authors:  Jay Devine; Marta Vidal-García; Wei Liu; Amanda Neves; Lucas D Lo Vercio; Rebecca M Green; Heather A Richbourg; Marta Marchini; Colton M Unger; Audrey C Nickle; Bethany Radford; Nathan M Young; Paula N Gonzalez; Robert E Schuler; Alejandro Bugacov; Campbell Rolian; Christopher J Percival; Trevor Williams; Lee Niswander; Anne L Calof; Arthur D Lander; Axel Visel; Frank R Jirik; James M Cheverud; Ophir D Klein; Ramon Y Birnbaum; Amy E Merrill; Rebecca R Ackermann; Daniel Graf; Myriam Hemberger; Wendy Dean; Nils D Forkert; Stephen A Murray; Henrik Westerberg; Ralph S Marcucio; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 8.501

5.  Quantification of gas exchange-related upward motion of the liver during prolonged breathholding-potential reduction of motion artifacts in abdominal MRI.

Authors:  Rachita Khot; Melissa McGettigan; James T Patrie; Sebastian Feuerlein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Computational anatomy and geometric shape analysis enables analysis of complex craniofacial phenotypes in zebrafish.

Authors:  Kelly M Diamond; Sara M Rolfe; Ronald Y Kwon; A Murat Maga
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.643

7.  Testing the accuracy of 3D automatic landmarking via genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Yoland Savriama; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.542

8.  Mapping genetic variants for cranial vault shape in humans.

Authors:  Jasmien Roosenboom; Myoung Keun Lee; Jacqueline T Hecht; Carrie L Heike; George L Wehby; Kaare Christensen; Eleanor Feingold; Mary L Marazita; A Murat Maga; John R Shaffer; Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.