Literature DB >> 26426826

Genetics of murine craniofacial morphology: diallel analysis of the eight founders of the Collaborative Cross.

Christopher J Percival1,2,3, Denise K Liberton2,3, Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena4, Richard Spritz5, Ralph Marcucio6, Benedikt Hallgrímsson1,2,3.   

Abstract

Using eight inbred founder strains of the mouse Collaborative Cross (CC) project and their reciprocal F1 hybrids, we quantified variation in craniofacial morphology across mouse strains, explored genetic contributions to craniofacial variation that distinguish the founder strains, and tested whether specific or summary measures of craniofacial shape display stronger additive genetic contributions. This study thus provides critical information about phenotypic diversity among CC founder strains and about the genetic contributions to this phenotypic diversity, which is relevant to understanding the basis of variation in standard laboratory strains and natural populations. Craniofacial shape was quantified as a series of size-adjusted linear dimensions (RDs) and by principal components (PC) analysis of morphological landmarks captured from computed tomography images from 62 of the 64 reciprocal crosses of the CC founder strains. We first identified aspects of skull morphology that vary between these phenotypically 'normal' founder strains and that are defining characteristics of these strains. We estimated the contributions of additive and various non-additive genetic factors to phenotypic variation using diallel analyses of a subset of these strongly differing RDs and the first eight PCs of skull shape variation. We find little difference in the genetic contributions to RD measures and PC scores, suggesting fundamental similarities in the magnitude of genetic contributions to both specific and summary measures of craniofacial phenotypes. Our results indicate that there are stronger additive genetic effects associated with defining phenotypic characteristics of specific founder strains, suggesting these distinguishing measures are good candidates for use in genotype-phenotype association studies of CC mice. Our results add significantly to understanding of genotype-phenotype associations in the skull, which serve as a foundation for modeling the origins of medically and evolutionarily relevant variation.
© 2015 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collaborative cross; craniofacial form; diallel; micro-computed tomography; morphometrics; mouse models; normal variation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26426826      PMCID: PMC4694168          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  61 in total

1.  Heritability of craniofacial characteristics between parents and offspring estimated from lateral cephalograms.

Authors:  Berglind Johannsdottir; Freyr Thorarinsson; Arni Thordarson; Thordur Eydal Magnusson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  A century after Fisher: time for a new paradigm in quantitative genetics.

Authors:  Ronald M Nelson; Mats E Pettersson; Örjan Carlborg
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  C P Klingenberg; L J Leamy; E J Routman; J M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in baboon cranial morphology.

Authors:  Charles C Roseman; Katherine E Willmore; Jeffrey Rogers; Charles Hildebolt; Brooke E Sadler; Joan T Richtsmeier; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Morphometric studies in inbred and hybrid house mice. I. Patterns in the mean values.

Authors:  L Leamy
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  Beyond the closed suture in apert syndrome mouse models: evidence of primary effects of FGFR2 signaling on facial shape at birth.

Authors:  Neus Martínez-Abadías; Christopher Percival; Kristina Aldridge; Cheryl A Hill; Timothy Ryan; Satama Sirivunnabood; Yingli Wang; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St Bernard dogs.

Authors:  Abby Grace Drake; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Shh and Fgf8 act synergistically to drive cartilage outgrowth during cranial development.

Authors:  Arhat Abzhanov; Clifford J Tabin
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Genome-wide association study of three-dimensional facial morphology identifies a variant in PAX3 associated with nasion position.

Authors:  Lavinia Paternoster; Alexei I Zhurov; Arshed M Toma; John P Kemp; Beate St Pourcain; Nicholas J Timpson; George McMahon; Wendy McArdle; Susan M Ring; George Davey Smith; Stephen Richmond; David M Evans
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Using the emerging Collaborative Cross to probe the immune system.

Authors:  J Phillippi; Y Xie; D R Miller; T A Bell; Z Zhang; A B Lenarcic; D L Aylor; S H Krovi; D W Threadgill; F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; W Wang; W Valdar; J A Frelinger
Journal:  Genes Immun       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.676

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Hybridization in human evolution: Insights from other organisms.

Authors:  Rebecca R Ackermann; Michael L Arnold; Marcella D Baiz; James A Cahill; Liliana Cortés-Ortiz; Ben J Evans; B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Robyn A Humphreys; Clifford J Jolly; Joanna Malukiewicz; Christopher J Percival; Terrence B Ritzman; Christian Roos; Charles C Roseman; Lauren Schroeder; Fred H Smith; Kerryn A Warren; Robert K Wayne; Dietmar Zinner
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2019-06-20

Review 2.  Integration and the Developmental Genetics of Allometry.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; David C Katz; Jose D Aponte; Jacinda R Larson; Jay Devine; Paula N Gonzalez; Nathan M Young; Charles C Roseman; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  Human Facial Shape and Size Heritability and Genetic Correlations.

Authors:  Joanne B Cole; Mange Manyama; Jacinda R Larson; Denise K Liberton; Tracey M Ferrara; Sheri L Riccardi; Mao Li; Washington Mio; Ophir D Klein; Stephanie A Santorico; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Richard A Spritz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic structure of phenotypic robustness in the collaborative cross mouse diallel panel.

Authors:  P N Gonzalez; M Pavlicev; P Mitteroecker; F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; R A Spritz; R S Marcucio; B Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Angiotensin receptor blockade mediated amelioration of mucopolysaccharidosis type I cardiac and craniofacial pathology.

Authors:  Mark J Osborn; Beau R Webber; Ronald T McElmurry; Kyle D Rudser; Anthony P DeFeo; Michael Muradian; Anna Petryk; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Bruce R Blazar; Jakub Tolar; Elizabeth A Braunlin
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  A population level atlas of Mus musculus craniofacial skeleton and automated image-based shape analysis.

Authors:  A Murat Maga; Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.

Authors:  Christopher J Percival; Jay Devine; Benjamin C Darwin; Wei Liu; Matthijs van Eede; R Mark Henkelman; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Merging morphological and genetic evidence to assess hybridization in Western Eurasian late Pleistocene hominins.

Authors:  K Harvati; R R Ackermann
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 19.100

9.  Does 3D Phenotyping Yield Substantial Insights in the Genetics of the Mouse Mandible Shape?

Authors:  Nicolas Navarro; A Murat Maga
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Craniofacial shape transition across the house mouse hybrid zone: implications for the genetic architecture and evolution of between-species differences.

Authors:  Luisa F Pallares; Leslie M Turner; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 0.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.