| Literature DB >> 28653999 |
Xiaoyun Bin1, Chaowen Lin2, Xiufeng Huang3, Qinghui Zhou4, Liping Wang5, Cory J Xian6.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a complex multifactorial disorder of gradual bone loss and increased fracture risk. While previous studies have shown the importance of many genetic factors in determining peak bone mass and fragility fractures and in suggesting involvement of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) in bone metabolism and bone mass, the relationship of FGF-2 genetic diversity with bone mass/osteoporosis has not yet been revealed. The current study investigated the potential relevance of FGF-2 gene polymorphism in osteoporosis among a Zhuang ethnic Chinese cohort of 623, including 237 normal bone mass controls, 227 osteopenia, and 159 osteoporosis of different ages. Bone density was examined by calcaneus ultrasound attenuation measurement, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and linkage disequilibrium analyses were performed on five SNP loci of FGF-2 gene. Significant differences were found in bone mass in males between the 45-year-old and ≥70-year-old groups (p < 0.01), and in females among 55, 60, 65 and 70-year-old groups (p < 0.05). Males had higher bone mass values than females in the same age (over 55-year-old) (p < 0.05). The proportions of individuals with normal bone mass decreased with age (65.2% to 40% in males, and 50% to 0% in females), whereas prevalence of osteoporosis increased with age (15.4% to 30% in men, and 7.7% to 82% in women). Out of five FGF-2 SNP loci, the TA genotype of rs308442 in the osteoporosis group (40.2%) was higher than in the control group (29.5%) (p < 0.05). The TA genotype was significantly correlated with the risk of osteoporosis (odds ratio OR = 1.653), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.968-1.441). Strong linkage disequilibrium in FGF-2 gene was also detected between rs12644427 and rs3747676, between rs12644427 and rs3789138, and between rs3747676 and rs3789138 (D' > 0.8, and r² > 0.33). Thus, the rs308442 locus of FGF-2 gene is closely correlated to osteoporosis in this Zhuang ethnic Chinese cohort, and the TA may be the risk genotype of osteoporosis.Entities:
Keywords: aging; bone ultrasound; fibroblast growth factor-2; human association studies; osteoporosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28653999 PMCID: PMC5535851 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18071358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Bone mass measurement results as broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA).
| Age Groups | BUA (g/cm2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | Females | |||
| 45 | 26 | 60.03 ± 5.99 | 14 | 59.62 ± 5.47 |
| 50 | 66 | 62.74 ± 4.59 | 78 | 61.63 ± 5.44 |
| 55 | 59 | 61.81 ± 5.52 | 83 | 58.02 ± 4.07 ** |
| 60 | 81 | 60.67 ± 4.66 | 69 | 56.62 ± 4.77 ** |
| 65 | 59 | 59.94 ± 6.01 | 67 | 54.69 ± 4.16 ** |
| 70 | 10 | 58.79 ± 5.17 | 11 | 52.58 ± 2.03 ** |
| Total | 301 | 61.09 ± 5.32 | 322 | 57.79 ± 5.29 ** |
Data as x ± SD; ** p < 0.01 versus males.
Figure 1Changes in the bone mass density (assessed as broadband ultrasound attenuation or BUA) with age of senior and middle-aged Zhuang people in Guangxi (** p < 0.01 versus males).
Figure 2Trends of percentage changes with age in individuals with normal bone mass among senior and middle-aged Zhuang people (** p < 0.01 versus males, *** p < 0.001 versus males).
Figure 3Trends of percentage changes with age in individuals with osteopenia among senior and middle-aged Zhuang people (** p <0.01 versus males).
Figure 4Trends of percentage changes with age in individuals with osteoporosis among senior and middle-aged Zhuang people (** p < 0.01 versus males, *** p < 0.001 versus males).
The age-related changes in numbers and prevalence of individuals with normal bone mass, osteopenia, and osteoporosis.
| Age Groups | Normal ( | Osteopenia ( | Osteoporosis ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| 45 | 12, 46.15% | 6, 42.86% | 10, 38.46% | 5, 35.71% | 4, 15.38% | 3, 21.43% |
| 50 | 43, 65.15% | 39, 50% | 19, 28.79% | 33, 42.31% | 4, 6.06% | 6, 7.69% |
| 55 | 30, 50.85% | 18, 21.69% | 24, 40.68% | 44, 53.01% | 5, 8.47% | 21, 25.3% |
| 60 | 41, 50.62% | 15, 21.74% | 28, 34.57% | 22, 31.88% | 12,14.81% | 32, 46.38% |
| 65 | 24, 40.68% | 5, 7.46% | 18, 30.51% | 19, 28.36% | 17, 28.81% | 43, 64.18% |
| ≥70 | 4, 40% | 0, 0% | 3, 30% | 2, 18.18% | 3, 30% | 9, 81.82% |
| Total | 154, 51.16% | 83, 25.78% | 102, 33.89% | 125, 38.82% | 45, 14.95% | 114, 35.4% |
χ2 = 144.653, p = 0.000.
Comparisons of distributions of genotype frequency in the five single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci of FGF-2 among the Normal, Osteopenia, and Osteoporosis groups.
| Normal vs.Osteoporosis | Normal vs.Osteopenia | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loci | Genotype | Normal | Osteopenia | Osteoporosis | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| rs12644427 | AA | 65 | 59 | 41 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| GA | 111 | 110 | 81 | 0.864 (1.403–0.532) | 0.555 | 0.916 (1.422–0.590) | 0.696 | |
| GG | 61 | 58 | 37 | 1.040 (1.832–0.591) | 0.892 | 0.955 (1.579–0.577) | 0.857 | |
| Allelic gene | ||||||||
| A | 241 | 228 | 163 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
| G | 233 | 226 | 155 | 1.017 (1.351–0.765) | 0.909 | 0.975 (1.262–0.754) | 0.849 | |
| rs308379 | TT | 82 | 84 | 43 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| TA | 109 | 101 | 82 | 0.697 (1.112–0.437) | 0.129 | 1.106 (1.661–0.736) | 0.629 | |
| AA | 46 | 42 | 34 | 0.709 (1.263–0.399) | 0.243 | 1.122 (1.882–0.669) | 0.663 | |
| Allelic gene | ||||||||
| T | 273 | 269 | 168 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
| A | 201 | 185 | 150 | 0.825 (1.097–0.62) | 0.186 | 1.071 (1.39–0.824) | 0.609 | |
| rs308442 | TT | 146 | 124 | 87 | 1.000 | |||
| TA | 50 | 84 | 91 | 1.652 (1.960–1.424) | 0.031 | 1.653 (1.968–1.441) | 0.033 | |
| AA | 21 | 12 | 8 | 1.565 (3.690–0.664) | 0.303 | 1.486 (3.142–0.703) | 0.297 | |
| Allelic gene | ||||||||
| T | 362 | 339 | 238 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
| A | 112 | 115 | 80 | 0.92 (1.281–0.662) | 0.623 | 0.912 (1.23–0.676) | 0.547 | |
| rs3747676 | TT | 69 | 70 | 43 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| CT | 112 | 103 | 85 | 0.821 (1.319–0.511) | 0.415 | 1.103 (1.690–0.720) | 0.652 | |
| CC | 56 | 54 | 31 | 1.126 (2.012–0.630) | 0.689 | 1.052 (1.735–0.638) | 0.842 | |
| Allelic gene | ||||||||
| T | 250 | 243 | 171 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
| C | 224 | 211 | 147 | 1.042 (1.386–0.784) | 0.776 | 1.032 (1.336–0.797) | 0.811 | |
| rs3789138 | AA | 71 | 70 | 43 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| GA | 116 | 104 | 87 | 0.808 (1.292–0.505) | 0.372 | 1.100 (1.679–0.720) | 0.660 | |
| GG | 50 | 53 | 29 | 1.044 (1.89–0.577) | 0.887 | 0.930 (1.546–0.560) | 0.780 | |
| Allelic gene | ||||||||
| A | 258 | 244 | 173 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
| G | 216 | 210 | 145 | 0.999 (1.329–0.751) | 0.994 | 0.973 (1.259–0.751) | 0.834 | |
Comparisons of bone mass density in the five SNP loci of FGF-2 among normal bone mass (Normal), Osteopenia, and Osteoporosis groups.
| Loci | Genotype | Normal | Osteopenia | Osteoporosis | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs12644427 | AA | 64.88 ± 3.84 | 58.11 ± 1.52 | 52.85 ± 1.53 | 59.47 ± 5.51 |
| GA | 65.39 ± 3.52 | 58.18 ± 1.55 | 52.67 ± 2.00 | 59.35 ± 5.69 | |
| GG | 64.83 ± 2.97 | 57.93 ± 1.4 | 52.51 ± 1.87 | 59.34 ± 5.36 | |
| 0.505 | 0.585 | 0.791 | 0.791 | ||
| rs308379 | TT | 65.02 ± 3.55 | 58.03 ± 1.48 | 52.82 ± 2.28 | 59.17 ± 5.36 |
| TA | 65.29 ± 3.58 | 58.16 ± 1.53 | 52.52 ± 1.7 | 59.24 ± 5.76 | |
| AA | 64.82 ± 3.12 | 58.08 ± 1.49 | 52.88 ± 1.62 | 59.70 ± 5.37 | |
| 0.715 | 0.846 | 0.545 | 0.593 | ||
| rs308442 | TT | 64.96 ± 3.45 | 58.11 ± 1.48 | 52.68 ± 1.98 | 61.04 ± 5.81 |
| TA | 65.24 ± 3.62 | 58.03 ± 1.52 | 52.67 ± 1.72 | 58.75 ± 5.45 | |
| AA | 65.68 ± 3.25 | 58.48 ± 1.65 | 52.69 ± 1.62 | 60.59 ± 5.55 | |
| 0.624 | 0.630 | 1.000 | 0.03 | ||
| rs3747676 | TT | 64.83 ± 2.85 | 57.82 ± 1.44 | 52.51 ± 1.85 | 59.67 ± 5.05 |
| CT | 65.57 ± 3.76 | 58.16 ± 1.52 | 52.57 ± 1.98 | 59.34 ± 5.93 | |
| CC | 64.53 ± 3.53 | 58.34 ± 1.52 | 53.22 ± 1.4 | 59.22 ± 5.30 | |
| 0.140 | 0.137 | 0.191 | 0.757 | ||
| rs3789138 | AA | 64.73 ± 2.87 | 57.83 ± 1.44 | 52.51 ± 1.85 | 59.25 ± 5.27 |
| GA | 65.54 ± 3.7 | 58.16 ± 1.52 | 52.6 ± 1.97 | 59.38 ± 5.91 | |
| GG | 64.64 ± 3.65 | 58.32 ± 1.53 | 53.15 ± 1.42 | 59.58 ± 5.09 | |
| 0.167 | 0.161 | 0.301 | 0.873 |
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) coefficient D’ in FGF-2 mutant loci.
| Mutant loci | rs308379 Case/Control Group | rs308442 Case/Control Group | rs3747676 Case/Control Group | rs3789138 Case/Control Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs12644427 | 0.144/0.162 | 0.553/0.524 | 0.922/0.875 | 0.966/0.811 |
| rs308379 | 0.124/0.107 | 0.182/0.210 | 0.183/0.174 | |
| rs308442 | 0.238/0.291 | 0.230/0.214 | ||
| rs3747676 | 0.997/0.895 |
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) coefficient r2 in FGF-2 mutant loci.
| Mutant loci | rs308379 | rs308442 | rs3747676 | rs3789138 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs12644427 | 0.016 | 0.097 | 0.725 | 0.767 |
| rs308379 | 0.007 | 0.022 | 0.021 | |
| rs308442 | 0.021 | 0.020 | ||
| rs3747676 | 0.959 |
Figure 5FGF-2 gene linkage disequilibrium and haplotype block structure. Values in cells indicate logarithm of odds (LOD) score of D’.
PCR primers for the five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the FGF-2 gene.
| Polymorphic Loci | Forward Primer (5’–3‘) | Reverse Primer (5’–3‘) | Extension Primer (5’–3‘) |
|---|---|---|---|
| rs12644427 | TTCACCATTTATGAAACACTGACTTG | GGGATCATCCAGTACACCTTCCCTAT | TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGAAACACTGACTTGTCTGTTTCCA |
| rs3789138 | TCCCTTGCCAATACCTTGTCAT | TTGCAGCCATGTGATTGGTGTC | TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGTGAGTTTTGAGCTAAGTTTTGGAGTA |
| rs308379 | TCCCGTATTTGTTACCTTCTGTCCA | TCCAGCAATTAGGTAGCATGGAGTG | TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTCCAGCCTCATTTAGTCCCCC |
| rs308442 | CCCTTCACGGAATTCCCCAATA | CATCCAGCAAGCATTTATGAAGCAC | TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTCAAGCATTTATGAAGCACTCATTG |
| rs3747676 | GGGGACATGCATATTAAGGAAAAGG | TCTCAACTGAGAAATAATCCCCTAACACA | TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTCAAATACATTGATTTGTCATGATACACA |