Literature DB >> 28641941

Role of recombination and replication fork restart in repeat instability.

Erica J Polleys1, Nealia C M House1, Catherine H Freudenreich2.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes contain many repetitive DNA sequences that exhibit size instability. Some repeat elements have the added complication of being able to form secondary structures, such as hairpin loops, slipped DNA, triplex DNA or G-quadruplexes. Especially when repeat sequences are long, these DNA structures can form a significant impediment to DNA replication and repair, leading to DNA nicks, gaps, and breaks. In turn, repair or replication fork restart attempts within the repeat DNA can lead to addition or removal of repeat elements, which can sometimes lead to disease. One important DNA repair mechanism to maintain genomic integrity is recombination. Though early studies dismissed recombination as a mechanism driving repeat expansion and instability, recent results indicate that mitotic recombination is a key pathway operating within repetitive DNA. The action is two-fold: first, it is an important mechanism to repair nicks, gaps, breaks, or stalled forks to prevent chromosome fragility and protect cell health; second, recombination can cause repeat expansions or contractions, which can be deleterious. In this review, we summarize recent developments that illuminate the role of recombination in maintaining genome stability at DNA repeats.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosome fragility; DNA structure; Recombination; Replication fork restart; Trinucleotide repeat expansion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28641941      PMCID: PMC5541998          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  136 in total

1.  Pathways for double-strand break repair in genetically unstable Z-DNA-forming sequences.

Authors:  Diem T Kha; Guliang Wang; Nithya Natrajan; Lynn Harrison; Karen M Vasquez
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Break-induced replication occurs by conservative DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Roberto A Donnianni; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Double-strand break repair can lead to high frequencies of deletions within short CAG/CTG trinucleotide repeats.

Authors:  G F Richard; B Dujon; J E Haber
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1999-06

4.  Simple repeat DNA is not replicated simply.

Authors:  R I Richards; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Mutations arising during repair of chromosome breaks.

Authors:  Anna Malkova; James E Haber
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Requirement of RAD52 group genes for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Venkateswarlu Gangavarapu; Satya Prakash; Louise Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  The balancing act of DNA repeat expansions.

Authors:  Jane C Kim; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  Expanded CAG/CTG repeat DNA induces a checkpoint response that impacts cell proliferation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Rangapriya Sundararajan; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Genome-wide screen reveals replication pathway for quasi-palindrome fragility dependent on homologous recombination.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Natalie Saini; Ziwei Sheng; Kirill S Lobachev
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  Relocalization of DNA lesions to the nuclear pore complex.

Authors:  Catherine H Freudenreich; Xiaofeng A Su
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.

Authors:  Simran Kaushal; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Guidelines for DNA recombination and repair studies: Cellular assays of DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  Hannah L Klein; Giedrė Bačinskaja; Jun Che; Anais Cheblal; Rajula Elango; Anastasiya Epshtein; Devon M Fitzgerald; Belén Gómez-González; Sharik R Khan; Sandeep Kumar; Bryan A Leland; Léa Marie; Qian Mei; Judith Miné-Hattab; Alicja Piotrowska; Erica J Polleys; Christopher D Putnam; Elina A Radchenko; Anissia Ait Saada; Cynthia J Sakofsky; Eun Yong Shim; Mathew Stracy; Jun Xia; Zhenxin Yan; Yi Yin; Andrés Aguilera; Juan Lucas Argueso; Catherine H Freudenreich; Susan M Gasser; Dmitry A Gordenin; James E Haber; Grzegorz Ira; Sue Jinks-Robertson; Megan C King; Richard D Kolodner; Andrei Kuzminov; Sarah Ae Lambert; Sang Eun Lee; Kyle M Miller; Sergei M Mirkin; Thomas D Petes; Susan M Rosenberg; Rodney Rothstein; Lorraine S Symington; Pawel Zawadzki; Nayun Kim; Michael Lisby; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2019-01-07

Review 3.  R-loops: targets for nuclease cleavage and repeat instability.

Authors:  Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  Relocation of Collapsed Forks to the Nuclear Pore Complex Depends on Sumoylation of DNA Repair Proteins and Permits Rad51 Association.

Authors:  Jenna M Whalen; Nalini Dhingra; Lei Wei; Xiaolan Zhao; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Cytosine deamination and base excision repair cause R-loop-induced CAG repeat fragility and instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xiaofeng A Su; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Distinct roles for S. cerevisiae H2A copies in recombination and repeat stability, with a role for H2A.1 threonine 126.

Authors:  Nealia Cm House; Erica J Polleys; Ishtiaque Quasem; Marjorie De la Rosa Mejia; Cailin E Joyce; Oliver Takacsi-Nagy; Jocelyn E Krebs; Stephen M Fuchs; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Cis- and Trans-Modifiers of Repeat Expansions: Blending Model Systems with Human Genetics.

Authors:  Ryan J McGinty; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  FAN1's protection against CGG repeat expansion requires its nuclease activity and is FANCD2-independent.

Authors:  Xiaonan Zhao; Huiyan Lu; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Changing of the guard: How the Lyme disease spirochete subverts the host immune response.

Authors:  George Chaconas; Mildred Castellanos; Theodore B Verhey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Structure-forming repeats and their impact on genome stability.

Authors:  Rebecca E Brown; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.578

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.