Literature DB >> 32402281

Relocation of Collapsed Forks to the Nuclear Pore Complex Depends on Sumoylation of DNA Repair Proteins and Permits Rad51 Association.

Jenna M Whalen1, Nalini Dhingra2, Lei Wei2, Xiaolan Zhao2, Catherine H Freudenreich3.   

Abstract

Expanded CAG repeats form stem-loop secondary structures that lead to fork stalling and collapse. Previous work has shown that these collapsed forks relocalize to nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) in late S phase in a manner dependent on replication, the nucleoporin Nup84, and the Slx5 protein, which prevents repeat fragility and instability. Here, we show that binding of the Smc5/6 complex to the collapsed fork triggers Mms21-dependent sumoylation of fork-associated DNA repair proteins, and that RPA, Rad52, and Rad59 are the key sumoylation targets that mediate relocation. The SUMO interacting motifs of Slx5 target collapsed forks to the NPC. Notably, Rad51 foci only co-localize with the repeat after it is anchored to the nuclear periphery and Rad51 exclusion from the early collapsed fork is dependent on RPA sumoylation. This pathway may provide a mechanism to constrain recombination at stalled or collapsed forks until it is required for fork restart.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAG repeat; RPA sumoylation; Rad52 Rad59 sumoylation; Smc5-Smc6; fork collapse; fork relocation; nuclear pore complex; replication fork; trinucleotide repeat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32402281      PMCID: PMC7344339          DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Rep            Impact factor:   9.423


  82 in total

1.  Control of Rad52 recombination activity by double-strand break-induced SUMO modification.

Authors:  Meik Sacher; Boris Pfander; Carsten Hoege; Stefan Jentsch
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Mre11 complex links sister chromatids to promote repair of a collapsed replication fork.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Hongchang Zhao; Oliver Limbo; Paul Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sae2 promotes dsDNA endonuclease activity within Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to resect DNA breaks.

Authors:  Elda Cannavo; Petr Cejka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Role of recombination and replication fork restart in repeat instability.

Authors:  Erica J Polleys; Nealia C M House; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

5.  SRS2 and SGS1 prevent chromosomal breaks and stabilize triplet repeats by restraining recombination.

Authors:  Alix Kerrest; Ranjith P Anand; Rangapriya Sundararajan; Rodrigo Bermejo; Giordano Liberi; Bernard Dujon; Catherine H Freudenreich; Guy-Franck Richard
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  Alteration of N-terminal phosphoesterase signature motifs inactivates Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11.

Authors:  D A Bressan; H A Olivares; B E Nelms; J H Petrini
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  PolySUMOylation by Siz2 and Mms21 triggers relocation of DNA breaks to nuclear pores through the Slx5/Slx8 STUbL.

Authors:  Chihiro Horigome; Denise E Bustard; Isabella Marcomini; Neda Delgoshaie; Monika Tsai-Pflugfelder; Jennifer A Cobb; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Differential requirement of Srs2 helicase and Rad51 displacement activities in replication of hairpin-forming CAG/CTG repeats.

Authors:  Jennifer H G Nguyen; David Viterbo; Ranjith P Anand; Lauren Verra; Laura Sloan; Guy-Franck Richard; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Live cell monitoring of double strand breaks in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  David P Waterman; Felix Zhou; Kevin Li; Cheng-Sheng Lee; Michael Tsabar; Vinay V Eapen; Allison Mazzella; James E Haber
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  RPA coordinates DNA end resection and prevents formation of DNA hairpins.

Authors:  Huan Chen; Michael Lisby; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Homologous recombination within repetitive DNA.

Authors:  Erica J Polleys; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Smc5/6 Complex Promotes Rad3ATR Checkpoint Signaling at the Perturbed Replication Fork through Sumoylation of the RecQ Helicase Rqh1.

Authors:  Saman Khan; Nafees Ahamad; Sankhadip Bhadra; Zheng Xu; Yong-Jie Xu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.069

Review 3.  Multi-scale dynamics of heterochromatin repair.

Authors:  Chiara Merigliano; Irene Chiolo
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 4.665

Review 4.  Advances in SUMO-based regulation of homologous recombination.

Authors:  Nalini Dhingra; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 5.  Structure-forming repeats and their impact on genome stability.

Authors:  Rebecca E Brown; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 6.  Collaborations between chromatin and nuclear architecture to optimize DNA repair fidelity.

Authors:  Beata Mackenroth; Eric Alani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-11-22

Review 7.  Location, Location, Location: The Role of Nuclear Positioning in the Repair of Collapsed Forks and Protection of Genome Stability.

Authors:  Jenna M Whalen; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  TEX264 at the intersection of autophagy and DNA repair.

Authors:  John Fielden; Marta Popović; Kristijan Ramadan
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 9.  SUMO-Targeted Ubiquitin Ligases and Their Functions in Maintaining Genome Stability.

Authors:  Ya-Chu Chang; Marissa K Oram; Anja-Katrin Bielinsky
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Mechanisms driving chromosomal translocations: lost in time and space.

Authors:  Dale A Ramsden; Andre Nussenzweig
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.