Literature DB >> 28640237

Broad consent for health care-embedded biobanking: understanding and reasons to donate in a large patient sample.

Gesine Richter1,2, Michael Krawczak3, Wolfgang Lieb1, Lena Wolff2, Stefan Schreiber4, Alena Buyx2.   

Abstract

PurposeTo facilitate ethically acceptable and practically successful health care-embedded biobanking, the attitudes and understanding of patients and their motivation to participate need to be explored.MethodsA questionnaire study was conducted among 760 outpatients of a northern German university hospital to assess their awareness of, and motivation for giving broad consent to health care-embedded biobanking, also addressing the issue of feedback on individual-level research findings.ResultsThe overall willingness to give broad consent was high (86.9%) in our study, even though the subjective and objective understanding of patients was found to be only modest. Most participants who consented did so for prosocial reasons (altruism, solidarity, reciprocity, gratitude), whereas self-interest or worries about disadvantages played only a marginal role. Better objective understanding was associated with both a greater demand for feedback on individual research findings and a higher willingness to consent. Intermittent modification of the information material provided by the hospital led to significantly improved objective understanding.ConclusionPatient willingness to give broad consent to health care-embedded biobanking is high, with prosocial reasons driving decision making more than factual knowledge and approval or disapproval of specific consent elements. Future efforts to improve the information material used in health care-embedded biobanking should therefore emphasize prosocial reasons to consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640237     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  20 in total

Review 1.  Biobanking residual tissues.

Authors:  Peter H J Riegman; Evert-Ben van Veen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients' understanding but reduce enrolment: a study in real settings.

Authors:  Adeline Paris; Béatrice Deygas; Catherine Cornu; Claire Thalamas; Patrick Maison; Christian Duale; Maty Kane; Enkelejda Hodaj; Jean-Luc Cracowski
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Michelle Wrenn; Nikki M Carroll; Heather Spencer Feigelson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-04-20

4.  A Clinical Service to Support the Return of Secondary Genomic Findings in Human Research.

Authors:  Andrew J Darnell; Howard Austin; David A Bluemke; Richard O Cannon; Kenneth Fischbeck; William Gahl; David Goldman; Christine Grady; Mark H Greene; Steven M Holland; Sara Chandros Hull; Forbes D Porter; David Resnik; Wendy S Rubinstein; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Biobanks containing clinical specimens: defining characteristics, policies, and practices.

Authors:  Teresa Edwards; R Jean Cadigan; James P Evans; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.281

6.  Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment.

Authors:  E Vermeulen; M K Schmidt; N K Aaronson; M Kuenen; P van der Valk; C Sietses; P van den Tol; F E van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.

Authors:  K E Ormond; A L Cirino; I B Helenowski; R L Chisholm; W A Wolf
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Informed consent for biobanking: consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Carrie B Dombeck; Cole P Thompson; J Kemp Watson-Ormond; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.

Authors:  Nanibaa' A Garrison; Nila A Sathe; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Ingrid A Holm; Saskia C Sanderson; Maureen E Smith; Melissa L McPheeters; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research.

Authors:  Jodyn Platt; Juli Bollinger; Rachel Dvoskin; Sharon L R Kardia; David Kaufman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  15 in total

1.  Understanding of Critical Elements of Informed Consent in Genomic Research: A Case of a Paediatric HIV-TB Research Project in Uganda.

Authors:  Francis Anyaka Amayoa; Frederick Nelson Nakwagala; John Barugahare; Ian Guyton Munabi; Erisa Sabakaki Mwaka
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 1.978

2.  Contextual Anonymization for Secondary Use of Big Data in Biomedical Research: Proposal for an Anonymization Matrix.

Authors:  John Rumbold; Barbara Pierscionek
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-11-22

3.  Linking pre-existing biorepositories for medical research: the PopGen 2.0 Network.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lieb; Gunnar Jacobs; Andreas Wolf; Gesine Richter; Karoline I Gaede; Jeanette Schwarz; Norbert Arnold; Ruwen Böhm; Alena Buyx; Ingolf Cascorbi; Andre Franke; Christine Glinicke; Janka Held-Feindt; Ralf Junker; Holger Kalthoff; Hans-Heiner Kramer; Frank Leypoldt; Nicolai Maass; Walter Maetzler; Sandra May; H Maximilian Mehdorn; Christoph Röcken; Clemens Schafmayer; Martin Schrappe; Stefan Schreiber; Susanne Sebens; Ulrich Stephani; Michael Synowitz; Jörg Weimer; Peter Zabel; Ute Nöthlings; Christian Röder; Michael Krawczak
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-29

4.  Data Work: Meaning-Making in the Era of Data-Rich Medicine.

Authors:  Amelia Fiske; Barbara Prainsack; Alena Buyx
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Motor, cognitive and mobility deficits in 1000 geriatric patients: protocol of a quantitative observational study before and after routine clinical geriatric treatment - the ComOn-study.

Authors:  Johanna Geritz; Sara Maetzold; Maren Steffen; Andrea Pilotto; Marta F Corrà; Mariana Moscovich; Maria C Rizzetti; Barbara Borroni; Alessandro Padovani; Annekathrin Alpes; Corinna Bang; Igor Barcellos; Ralf Baron; Thorsten Bartsch; Jos S Becktepe; Daniela Berg; Lu M Bergeest; Philipp Bergmann; Raquel Bouça-Machado; Michael Drey; Morad Elshehabi; Susan Farahmandi; Joaquim J Ferreira; Andre Franke; Anja Friederich; Corinna Geisler; Philipp Hüllemann; Janne Gierthmühlen; Oliver Granert; Sebastian Heinzel; Maren K Heller; Markus A Hobert; Marc Hofmann; Björn Jemlich; Laura Kerkmann; Stephanie Knüpfer; Katharina Krause; Maximilian Kress; Sonja Krupp; Jennifer Kudelka; Gregor Kuhlenbäumer; Roland Kurth; Frank Leypoldt; Corina Maetzler; Luis F Maia; Andreas Moewius; Patricia Neumann; Katharina Niemann; Christian T Ortlieb; Steffen Paschen; Minh H Pham; Thomas Puehler; Franziska Radloff; Christian Riedel; Marten Rogalski; Simone Sablowsky; Elena M Schanz; Linda Schebesta; Andreas Schicketmüller; Simone Studt; Martina Thieves; Lars Tönges; Sebastian Ullrich; Peter P Urban; Nuno Vila-Chã; Anna Wiegard; Elke Warmerdam; Tobias Warnecke; Michael Weiss; Julius Welzel; Clint Hansen; Walter Maetzler
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  An Integrated, Scalable, Electronic Video Consent Process to Power Precision Health Research: Large, Population-Based, Cohort Implementation and Scalability Study.

Authors:  Clara Lajonchere; Arash Naeim; Sarah Dry; Neil Wenger; David Elashoff; Sitaram Vangala; Antonia Petruse; Maryam Ariannejad; Clara Magyar; Liliana Johansen; Gabriela Werre; Maxwell Kroloff; Daniel Geschwind
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 7.  Radiotherapy biobanking: current landscape, opportunities, challenges, and future aspirations.

Authors:  Tim H Ward; Duncan C Gilbert; George Higginbotham; Chris M Morris; Valerie Speirs; Nicola J Curtin
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2021-10-17

8.  Consent to research participation: understanding and motivation among German pupils.

Authors:  Jana Reetz; Gesine Richter; Christoph Borzikowsky; Christine Glinicke; Stephanie Darabaneanu; Alena Buyx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Evaluation of interleukin-6 and its soluble receptor components sIL-6R and sgp130 as markers of inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Susanna Nikolaus; Georg H Waetzig; Sven Butzin; Monika Ziolkiewicz; Natalie Al-Massad; Florian Thieme; Ulf Lövgren; Birgitte B Rasmussen; Torsten M Reinheimer; Dirk Seegert; Philip Rosenstiel; Silke Szymczak; Stefan Schreiber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Secondary research use of personal medical data: attitudes from patient and population surveys in The Netherlands and Germany.

Authors:  Gesine Richter; Christoph Borzikowsky; Wiebke Lesch; Sebastian C Semler; Eline M Bunnik; Alena Buyx; Michael Krawczak
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.