| Literature DB >> 26942283 |
Andrew J Darnell1, Howard Austin2, David A Bluemke3, Richard O Cannon4, Kenneth Fischbeck5, William Gahl6, David Goldman7, Christine Grady8, Mark H Greene9, Steven M Holland10, Sara Chandros Hull11, Forbes D Porter12, David Resnik13, Wendy S Rubinstein14, Leslie G Biesecker15.
Abstract
Human genome and exome sequencing are powerful research tools that can generate secondary findings beyond the scope of the research. Most secondary genomic findings are of low importance, but some (for a current estimate of 1%-3% of individuals) confer high risk of a serious disease that could be mitigated by timely medical intervention. The impact and scope of secondary findings in genome and exome sequencing will only increase in the future. There is considerable agreement that high-impact findings should be returned to participants, but many researchers performing genomic research studies do not have the background, skills, or resources to identify, verify, interpret, and return such variants. Here, we introduce a proposal for the formation of a secondary-genomic-findings service (SGFS) that would support researchers by enabling the return of clinically actionable sequencing results to research participants in a standardized manner. We describe a proposed structure for such a centralized service and evaluate the advantages and challenges of the approach. We suggest that such a service would be of greater benefit to all parties involved than present practice, which is highly variable. We encourage research centers to consider the adoption of a centralized SGFS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26942283 PMCID: PMC4800041 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.01.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hum Genet ISSN: 0002-9297 Impact factor: 11.025