Literature DB >> 26942283

A Clinical Service to Support the Return of Secondary Genomic Findings in Human Research.

Andrew J Darnell1, Howard Austin2, David A Bluemke3, Richard O Cannon4, Kenneth Fischbeck5, William Gahl6, David Goldman7, Christine Grady8, Mark H Greene9, Steven M Holland10, Sara Chandros Hull11, Forbes D Porter12, David Resnik13, Wendy S Rubinstein14, Leslie G Biesecker15.   

Abstract

Human genome and exome sequencing are powerful research tools that can generate secondary findings beyond the scope of the research. Most secondary genomic findings are of low importance, but some (for a current estimate of 1%-3% of individuals) confer high risk of a serious disease that could be mitigated by timely medical intervention. The impact and scope of secondary findings in genome and exome sequencing will only increase in the future. There is considerable agreement that high-impact findings should be returned to participants, but many researchers performing genomic research studies do not have the background, skills, or resources to identify, verify, interpret, and return such variants. Here, we introduce a proposal for the formation of a secondary-genomic-findings service (SGFS) that would support researchers by enabling the return of clinically actionable sequencing results to research participants in a standardized manner. We describe a proposed structure for such a centralized service and evaluate the advantages and challenges of the approach. We suggest that such a service would be of greater benefit to all parties involved than present practice, which is highly variable. We encourage research centers to consider the adoption of a centralized SGFS.
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26942283      PMCID: PMC4800041          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  29 in total

1.  Anticipate and communicate: Ethical management of incidental and secondary findings in the clinical, research, and direct-to-consumer contexts (December 2013 report of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues).

Authors:  Christine Weiner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; Robert C Green
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.

Authors:  Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Jonathan S Berg; Kyle Brothers; Ellen W Clayton; Wendy Chung; Barbara J Evans; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Carlos J Gallego; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Stacy W Gray; Ingrid A Holm; Iftikhar J Kullo; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Cathy McCarty; Cynthia A Prows; Heidi L Rehm; Richard R Sharp; Joseph Salama; Saskia Sanderson; Sara L Van Driest; Marc S Williams; Susan M Wolf; Wendy A Wolf; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Tanya M Harrell; Seema M Jamal; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Coll Dent       Date:  2014

6.  ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Paul S Appelbaum; Abby Fyer; Josue Martinez; Brigitte Buquez; Julia Wynn; Cameron R Waldman; Jo Phelan; Erik Parens; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  The cost-effectiveness of returning incidental findings from next-generation genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Caroline S Bennette; Carlos J Gallego; Wylie Burke; Gail P Jarvik; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Return of individual genetic results in a high-risk sample: enthusiasm and positive behavioral change.

Authors:  Sarah M Hartz; Emily Olfson; Robert Culverhouse; Patricia Cavazos-Rehg; Li-Shiun Chen; James DuBois; Sherri Fisher; Kimberly Kaphingst; David Kaufman; Andrew Plunk; Shelina Ramnarine; Stephanie Solomon; Nancy L Saccone; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berg; Laura M Amendola; Christine Eng; Eliezer Van Allen; Stacy W Gray; Nikhil Wagle; Heidi L Rehm; Elizabeth T DeChene; Matthew C Dulik; Fuki M Hisama; Wylie Burke; Nancy B Spinner; Levi Garraway; Robert C Green; Sharon Plon; James P Evans; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  15 in total

1.  Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.

Authors:  Katie Fiallos; Carolyn Applegate; Debra Jh Mathews; Juli Bollinger; Amanda L Bergner; Cynthia A James
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Evaluation of Recipients of Positive and Negative Secondary Findings Evaluations in a Hybrid CLIA-Research Sequencing Pilot.

Authors:  Julie C Sapp; Jennifer J Johnston; Kate Driscoll; Alexis R Heidlebaugh; Ane Miren Sagardia; D Nadine Dogbe; Kendall L Umstead; Erin Turbitt; Ilias Alevizos; Jeffrey Baron; Carsten Bönnemann; Brian Brooks; Sandra Donkervoort; Youn Hee Jee; W Marston Linehan; Francis J McMahon; Joel Moss; James C Mullikin; Deborah Nielsen; Eileen Pelayo; Alan T Remaley; Richard Siegel; Helen Su; Carlos Zarate; Teri A Manolio; Barbara B Biesecker; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results.

Authors:  Courtney Berrios; Cynthia A James; Karen Raraigh; Juli Bollinger; Brittney Murray; Crystal Tichnell; Carolyn D Applegate; Amanda L Bergner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Invited Commentary on "My Research Results: a program to facilitate return of clinically actionable genomic research findings" by Willis et al.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Strategies to Guide the Return of Genomic Research Findings: An Australian Perspective.

Authors:  Lisa Eckstein; Margaret Otlowski
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 6.  Implementing genomics and pharmacogenomics in the clinic: The National Human Genome Research Institute's genomic medicine portfolio.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 5.162

Review 7.  Strategic vision for improving human health at The Forefront of Genomics.

Authors:  Eric D Green; Chris Gunter; Leslie G Biesecker; Valentina Di Francesco; Carla L Easter; Elise A Feingold; Adam L Felsenfeld; David J Kaufman; Elaine A Ostrander; William J Pavan; Adam M Phillippy; Anastasia L Wise; Jyoti Gupta Dayal; Britny J Kish; Allison Mandich; Christopher R Wellington; Kris A Wetterstrand; Sarah A Bates; Darryl Leja; Susan Vasquez; William A Gahl; Bettie J Graham; Daniel L Kastner; Paul Liu; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Benjamin D Solomon; Vence L Bonham; Lawrence C Brody; Carolyn M Hutter; Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Broad consent for health care-embedded biobanking: understanding and reasons to donate in a large patient sample.

Authors:  Gesine Richter; Michael Krawczak; Wolfgang Lieb; Lena Wolff; Stefan Schreiber; Alena Buyx
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2021 update: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  David T Miller; Kristy Lee; Adam S Gordon; Laura M Amendola; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Wendy K Chung; Michael H Gollob; Steven M Harrison; Gail E Herman; Ray E Hershberger; Teri E Klein; Kent McKelvey; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Douglas R Stewart; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Kara N Maxwell; Laura DiGiovanni; Jamie Brower; Dominique Fetzer; Jill Bennett Gaieski; Amanda Brandt; Danielle McKenna; Jessica Long; Jacquelyn Powers; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.