Literature DB >> 23605056

Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding.

Alanna Kulchak Rahm1, Michelle Wrenn, Nikki M Carroll, Heather Spencer Feigelson.   

Abstract

Population-based biobanks are a critical resource for genetic research. It is important to know what potential participants understand about the risks and benefits of providing samples in order to ensure adequate informed consent. Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) is currently planning a biobank where adult members would be asked to contribute an additional tube of blood during a routine blood draw. Adult KPCO members in clinic waiting rooms were asked to read an informational brochure and informed consent form. Respondents then completed a survey to evaluate their understanding of the materials, willingness to provide a blood sample to a biobank, and facilitators and barriers to participation. Two hundred three members participated in the survey, of whom 69 % indicated willingness to contribute to a biobank. Nearly all understood that they would not be paid for any products resulting from the use of their blood and would not receive results from their samples (91 and 84 %, respectively). Seventy-four percent would donate a sample because, "it is important to contribute to research," and over half the participants (56 %) said they had no concerns about contributing to a biobank. Of those with concerns, 35 % said information security was a reason. In multivariate models, older age and trust in KPCO were significant predictors of willingness to participate (p = 0.03 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Data from this survey indicate an overall willingness to participate in a biobank, provide possible barriers to participation, and identify ways to improve informational materials to ensure adequate informed consent.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23605056      PMCID: PMC3773315          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0146-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  18 in total

1.  Biobanks. Population databases boom, from Iceland to the U.S.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Biobank Recruitment: Motivations for Nonparticipation.

Authors:  Katrina A B Goddard; K Sabina Smith; Chuhe Chen; Carmit McMullen; Cheryl Johnson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Consent to the use of stored DNA for genetics research: a survey of attitudes in the Jewish population.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; K Rothenberg; L Joseph; J Benkendorf; C Lerman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-02-01

4.  Patients attending tertiary referral urology clinics: willingness to participate in tissue banking.

Authors:  Patricia E Fitzpatrick; Kenneth D McKenzie; Avril Beasley; John D Sheehan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.

Authors:  K E Ormond; A L Cirino; I B Helenowski; R L Chisholm; W A Wolf
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project.

Authors:  Catherine A McCarty; Donna Chapman-Stone; Teresa Derfus; Philip F Giampietro; Norman Fost
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models.

Authors:  Christian M Simon; Jamie L'heureux; Jeffrey C Murray; Patricia Winokur; George Weiner; Elizabeth Newbury; Laura Shinkunas; Bridget Zimmerman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.

Authors:  David Kaufman; Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience.

Authors:  Geraldine M McQuillan; Kathryn S Porter; Maria Agelli; Raynard Kington
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  39 in total

1.  Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Mildred K Cho; Katherine Gillespie; Meghan Halley; Nina Varsava; Kelly E Ormond; Harold S Luft; Benjamin S Wilfond; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Factors associated with participation by African Americans in a study of the genetics of glaucoma.

Authors:  Rupin Parikh; Laura O'Keefe; Rebecca Salowe; Makayla Mccoskey; Wei Pan; Prithvi Sankar; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Victoria Addis; Amanda Lehman; Maureen Maguire; Joan O'Brien
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Community Perceptions of Biobanking Participation: A Qualitative Study among Mexican-Americans in Three Texas Cities.

Authors:  Natalia I Heredia; Sarah Krasny; Larkin L Strong; Laura Von Hatten; Lynne Nguyen; Belinda M Reininger; Lorna H McNeill; María E Fernández
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Development and validation of the biobanking attitudes and knowledge survey (BANKS).

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Mariana Arevalo; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede; Gwendolyn P Quinn; John S Luque; Gloria San Miguel; Dale Watson; Rebecca Phillips; Carmen Reyes; Margarita Romo; Jim West; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Public-private relationships in biobanking: a still underestimated key component of open innovation.

Authors:  Paul Hofman; Christian Bréchot; Kurt Zatloukal; Georges Dagher; Bruno Clément
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Development and Validation of the Biomedical Research Trust Scale (BRTS) in English and Spanish.

Authors:  Sharon H Baik; Mariana Arevalo; Clement Gwede; Cathy D Meade; Paul B Jacobsen; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Did I Tell You That? Ethical Issues Related to Using Computational Methods to Discover Non-Disclosed Patient Characteristics.

Authors:  Kenrick D Cato; Walter Bockting; Elaine Larson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Perceptions of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases on biobanking.

Authors:  Millie D Long; R Jean Cadigan; Suzanne F Cook; Kaaren Haldeman; Kriste Kuczynski; Robert S Sandler; Christopher F Martin; Wenli Chen; Michael D Kappelman
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.325

9.  Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women.

Authors:  Katherine M Brown; Bettina F Drake; Sarah Gehlert; Leslie E Wolf; James DuBois; Joann Seo; Krista Woodward; Hannah Perkins; Melody S Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-08-25

Review 10.  The research participant perspective related to the conduct of genomic cohort studies: A systematic review of the quantitative literature.

Authors:  Deborah Goodman; Deborah Bowen; Lari Wenzel; Paris Tehrani; Francis Fernando; Araksi Khacheryan; Farihah Chowdhury; Catherine O Johnson; Karen Edwards
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.