Literature DB >> 35548950

Understanding of Critical Elements of Informed Consent in Genomic Research: A Case of a Paediatric HIV-TB Research Project in Uganda.

Francis Anyaka Amayoa1, Frederick Nelson Nakwagala1, John Barugahare2, Ian Guyton Munabi1, Erisa Sabakaki Mwaka1.   

Abstract

Several studies have reported inadequate comprehension of informed consent for genomic research. This study aimed to assess research participants' understanding of critical elements of informed consent for genomic research. A cross-sectional survey involving 123 parents/caregivers of children participating in a paediatric genomic TB/HIV study was conducted. Only 47.2% of the participants had adequate understanding of consent information. The mean objective (actual) and subjective (perceived) understanding scores were 78.7% and 91.7% respectively. Participants adequately understood most elements of consent however, some elements were poorly understood including foreseeable risks, protection of confidentiality and compensation for research related injury. Overall there was inadequate comprehension of critical elements of informed consent and there was dissonance between actual and perceived comprehension of informed consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biobanking; genomic research; informed consent; research participants; understanding

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35548950      PMCID: PMC9398965          DOI: 10.1177/15562646221100430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.978


  53 in total

1.  A computer-based education intervention to enhance surrogates' informed consent for genomics research.

Authors:  Ann K Shelton; Bradley D Freeman; Anne F Fish; Jean A Bachman; Lloyd I Richardson
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 2.  The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries.

Authors:  Amulya Mandava; Christine Pace; Benjamin Campbell; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Randomized comparison of two interventions to enhance understanding during the informed consent process for research.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor; Daphne Washington; Nae-Yuh Wang; Hiten Patel; Daniel Ford; Nancy E Kass; Joseph Ali
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Levels of knowledge and perceived understanding among participants in cancer clinical trials - factors related to the informed consent procedure.

Authors:  Mia Bergenmar; Hemming Johansson; Nils Wilking
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Michelle Wrenn; Nikki M Carroll; Heather Spencer Feigelson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-04-20

6.  Standard Versus Simplified Consent Materials for Biobank Participation: Differences in Patient Knowledge and Trial Accrual.

Authors:  Sarah B Garrett; Marie Murphy; James Wiley; Daniel Dohan
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.978

7.  Improving biobank consent comprehension: a national randomized survey to assess the effect of a simplified form and review/retest intervention.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Li Lin; Carrie B Dombeck; Emily Gao; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Researchers' perspectives on return of individual genetics results to research participants: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Erisa Sabakaki Mwaka; Deborah Ekusai Sebatta; Joseph Ochieng; Ian Guyton Munabi; Godfrey Bagenda; Deborah Ainembabazi; David Kaawa-Mafigiri
Journal:  Glob Bioeth       Date:  2021-03-09

9.  Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lika Nusbaum; Brenda Douglas; Karla Damus; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Neenah Estrella-Luna
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2017-09-20

10.  Informed Consent Form Challenges for Genetic Research in Jordan.

Authors:  Almuthanna K Alkaraki; Omar F Khabour; Karem H Alzoubi; Lina M K Al-Ebbini; Zaid Altaany
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.