John Okombo1, Kelly Chibale1,2. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Cape Town , Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. 2. South African Medical Research Council Drug Discovery and Development Research Unit, Drug Discovery and Development Centre (H3D), Department of Chemistry and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town , Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
Abstract
New, safe and effective drugs are urgently needed to treat and control malaria and tuberculosis, which affect millions of people annually. However, financial return on investment in the poor settings where these diseases are mostly prevalent is very minimal to support market-driven drug discovery and development. Moreover, the imminent loss of therapeutic lifespan of existing therapies due to evolution and spread of drug resistance further compounds the urgency to identify novel effective drugs. However, the advent of new public-private partnerships focused on tropical diseases and the recent release of large data sets by pharmaceutical companies on antimalarial and antituberculosis compounds derived from phenotypic whole cell high throughput screening have spurred renewed interest and opened new frontiers in malaria and tuberculosis drug discovery. This Account recaps the existing challenges facing antimalarial and antituberculosis drug discovery, including limitations associated with experimental animal models as well as biological complexities intrinsic to the causative pathogens. We enlist various highlights from a body of work within our research group aimed at identifying and characterizing new chemical leads, and navigating these challenges to contribute toward the global drug discovery and development pipeline in malaria and tuberculosis. We describe a catalogue of in-house efforts toward deriving safe and efficacious preclinical drug development candidates via cell-based medicinal chemistry optimization of phenotypic whole-cell medium and high throughput screening hits sourced from various small molecule chemical libraries. We also provide an appraisal of target-based screening, as invoked in our laboratory for mechanistic evaluation of the hits generated, with particular focus on the enzymes within the de novo pyrimidine biosynthetic and hemoglobin degradation pathways, the latter constituting a heme detoxification process and an associated cysteine protease-mediated hydrolysis of hemoglobin. We further expound on the recombinant enzyme assays, heme fractionation experiments, and genomic and chemoproteomic methods that we employed to identify Plasmodium falciparum falcipain 2 (PfFP2), hemozoin formation, phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (PfPI4K) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis cytochrome bc1 complex as the targets of the antimalarial chalcones, pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazoles, aminopyridines, and antimycobacterial pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyridine-1,3(2H)-diones, respectively. In conclusion, we argue for the expansion of chemical space through exploitation of privileged natural product scaffolds and diversity-oriented synthesis, as well as the broadening of druggable spaces by exploiting available protein crystal structures, -omics data, and bioinformatics infrastructure to explore hitherto untargeted spaces like lipid metabolism and protein kinases in P. falciparum. Finally, we audit the merits of both target-based and whole-cell phenotypic screening in steering antimalarial and antituberculosis chemical matter toward populating drug discovery pipelines with new lead molecules.
New, safe and effective drugs are urgently needed to treat and control malaria and tuberculosis, which affect millions of people annually. However, financial return on investment in the poor settings where these diseases are mostly prevalent is very minimal to support market-driven drug discovery and development. Moreover, the imminent loss of therapeutic lifespan of existing therapies due to evolution and spread of drug resistance further compounds the urgency to identify novel effective drugs. However, the advent of new public-private partnerships focused on tropical diseases and the recent release of large data sets by pharmaceutical companies on antimalarial and antituberculosis compounds derived from phenotypic whole cell high throughput screening have spurred renewed interest and opened new frontiers in malaria and tuberculosis drug discovery. This Account recaps the existing challenges facing antimalarial and antituberculosis drug discovery, including limitations associated with experimental animal models as well as biological complexities intrinsic to the causative pathogens. We enlist various highlights from a body of work within our research group aimed at identifying and characterizing new chemical leads, and navigating these challenges to contribute toward the global drug discovery and development pipeline in malaria and tuberculosis. We describe a catalogue of in-house efforts toward deriving safe and efficacious preclinical drug development candidates via cell-based medicinal chemistry optimization of phenotypic whole-cell medium and high throughput screening hits sourced from various small molecule chemical libraries. We also provide an appraisal of target-based screening, as invoked in our laboratory for mechanistic evaluation of the hits generated, with particular focus on the enzymes within the de novo pyrimidine biosynthetic and hemoglobin degradation pathways, the latter constituting a heme detoxification process and an associated cysteine protease-mediated hydrolysis of hemoglobin. We further expound on the recombinant enzyme assays, heme fractionation experiments, and genomic and chemoproteomic methods that we employed to identify Plasmodium falciparum falcipain 2 (PfFP2), hemozoin formation, phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (PfPI4K) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis cytochrome bc1 complex as the targets of the antimalarial chalcones, pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazoles, aminopyridines, and antimycobacterial pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyridine-1,3(2H)-diones, respectively. In conclusion, we argue for the expansion of chemical space through exploitation of privileged natural product scaffolds and diversity-oriented synthesis, as well as the broadening of druggable spaces by exploiting available protein crystal structures, -omics data, and bioinformatics infrastructure to explore hitherto untargeted spaces like lipid metabolism and protein kinases in P. falciparum. Finally, we audit the merits of both target-based and whole-cell phenotypic screening in steering antimalarial and antituberculosis chemical matter toward populating drug discovery pipelines with new lead molecules.
Malaria
and tuberculosis (TB) remain global health problems. According
to the latest World Health Organization estimates, ∼3.2 billion
people are still at risk of malaria with 212 million new cases resulting
in an approximate 429 000 deaths in 2015.[1] Similarly, ∼10.4 million incident cases of TB were
reported in 2015, of which approximately 12% were co-infections with
the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This led to about 1.4 million
TB deaths and an additional 400 000 deaths resulting from TB
disease among people living with HIV in 2015.[2]The current first-line treatment strategies against malaria
hinge
on artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), which comprise
an artemisinin derivative, partnered with a longer-acting antimalarial
(Figure A). While
largely still effective, there are reports of emerging ACT-tolerance
characterized by prolonged parasite clearance times,[3,4] hinting at imminent loss of therapeutic utility of ACTs. On the
other hand, first-line treatment of drug-susceptible TB involves an
initial phase of isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA),
and ethambutol (EMB) for the first 2 months, followed by a 4-month
continuation phase of INH and RIF (Figure B). Against multidrug-resistant TB, bedaquiline
(BDQ) is normally introduced to the standard treatment regimen and
administered for a maximum of 6 months,[5] highlighting the cumbersome extensive treatment duration. As in
malaria, the evolution and spread of drug resistance presents a major
impediment to control efforts against TB, hence a pressing need for
new, safe and effective drugs.
Figure 1
Recommended standard combination treatment
for malaria (A) and
tuberculosis (B).
Recommended standard combination treatment
for malaria (A) and
tuberculosis (B).Over the last 10–15
years, a number of significant developments
have stimulated ongoing efforts for new drugs against malaria and
TB. These include the founding of new public–private partnerships
focused on tropical diseases[6] and the release,
by pharmaceutical companies, of large data sets on antimalarial and
anti-TB compounds derived from phenotypic high-throughput screening
(HTS).[7−9] In addition, public–private partnership involvement
in antiparasitic and antimycobacterial drug discovery by Medicines
for Malaria Venture (MMV), Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative,
and the Global Alliance for TB Drug Development[6] have provided new impetus. In this Account, we appraise
of the challenges facing antimalarial and anti-TB drug discovery initiatives
and discuss the various strategies we have exploited toward contributing
to new drugs against Plasmodium falciparum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the respective causative agents
of malaria and TB. We conclude with a perspective on potential areas
of future research in drug discovery against these pathogens.
Challenges Facing Malaria and TB Drug Discovery
Antimalarial
and anti-TB drug pipelines are inadequately populated
due to the time-consuming nature of the process, high candidate attrition
rates, insufficient financial investments, and other limitations intrinsic
to the biological complexities of the pathogens. One key challenge
relates to the dearth of suitable animal models to optimally assess
compound activity and efficacy. In malaria, for instance, though murine
parasites like P. berghei readily infect laboratory
mice and are extensively utilized in early drug discovery projects,
the species fundamentally differ from the human parasite and, as such,
can present with dissimilar sensitivities to drugs tested. Moreover,
biological disparities between humans and rodents make interpretation
of the subsequent data speculative at best. Similarly in TB, although
mice are readily infected by M. tuberculosis, the
human disease pathology is not recapitulated in mice. Hence, the translational
value of the mouse model is largely lost since the natural disease
pathway between the two species is not conserved. This need for relevant
in vivo models of drug efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology
ushered the emergence of humanized mice, characteristically immunodeficientmice engrafted with human hematopoietic cells or tissues or transgenically
expressing human genes,[10] as critical preclinical
evaluation tools. Though these have contributed to a better understanding
of disease pathways, they too are fraught with limitations. For instance,
chimeric mice having both human and mouse liver tissues are likely
to exhibit comparatively elevated extent of murine drug metabolism,
which can confound analyses since mice have a higher metabolic rate.
Additionally, extra-hepatic human-specific factors affecting drug
metabolism or clearance cannot be identified in such chimeras. Lastly,
since many aspects of mammalian biological systems, particularly immune
systems, are species-specific, these models present limited value
in the analysis of immune-mediated drug toxicities.Second,
the complex biology of the parasites presents a daunting
challenge to the development of pan-active compounds against all parasite
life cycle stages. The P. falciparum life cycle comprises
intricate hepatic, asexual erythrocytic, sexual gametocytic, and vector
host stages, while M. tuberculosis is characterized
by two metabolically distinct growth states, an active replicative
and a nonproliferative persistent one. This potentially obscures identification
and characterization of druggable targets. Furthermore, the sketchy
understanding of the pathogens’ biology, partly attributable
to incomplete annotation of their genomes, complicates drug discovery
efforts since target-based screening is customarily contingent on
successful ascription of biological function to targets and biochemical
validation of their tractability.Another challenge involves
the limited number of new chemotypes
explored for clinical evaluation. Most new therapies in malaria, for
example, are based on different combinations of known drugs or novel
drugs based on known pharmacophores.[11] While
undoubtedly effective, a higher risk of rapid loss of their useful
therapeutic lifespan exists owing to the organisms’ adaptation
to drug pressure from prior use of their related scaffold(s). Indeed,
the two pathogens are endowed with permissive genomes that can allow
for polymorphisms in response to selective pressure and compensatory
mechanisms that offset any subsequent loss of fitness from these mutations.
All these challenges ultimately translate to poor rates of successful
transitioning of drug candidates into clinical evaluation thus necessitating
the need for a constant supply of novel biologically relevant chemical
matter, defined as inhibitory molecules with desirable physicochemical
traits and toxicity profiles that are amenable to clinical application.
Approaches to Novel Antimalarial and Anti-TB
Leads
Traditionally, target-directed and whole-cell phenotypic
screenings
represent two complementary methods of identifying viable new medicinal
chemistry starting points. These approaches have recently been reviewed
and contrasted within the context of antiparasitic[12−15] and antimycobacterial[16] drug discovery. This section attempts to flesh
out both strategies as pursued in our research group, specifically
with regard to cell-based medicinal chemistry optimization of hits
and attendant target identification efforts (Figure ). The blueprint of our drug candidate identification
approach espouses an integrated screening cascade for hit to lead
optimization (Figure ).
Figure 2
Breakdown of small molecule hit generation from source to target
identification screening as explored within our laboratory.
Figure 3
Hit to lead optimization screening cascade for
malaria and TB chemical
series highlighting P. falciparum- (aqua blue) and M. tuberculosis-specific (green) platforms. Assays or platforms
common to both are indicated in gray. IC50 = half-maximal
inhibitory concentration; MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration;
NF54 and K1 = sensitive and resistant P. falciparum strains, respectively; H37Rv and 18b = replicating and nonreplicating M. tuberculosis strains; RLM/MLM/HLM = rat, mouse and human
liver microsomes; CHO = Chinese hamster ovarian cells; hERG = human
ether-a-go-go-related gene; ED = effective dose; F = bioavailability; SCID = severe combined immunodeficiency.
Breakdown of small molecule hit generation from source to target
identification screening as explored within our laboratory.Hit to lead optimization screening cascade for
malaria and TB chemical
series highlighting P. falciparum- (aqua blue) and M. tuberculosis-specific (green) platforms. Assays or platforms
common to both are indicated in gray. IC50 = half-maximal
inhibitory concentration; MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration;
NF54 and K1 = sensitive and resistant P. falciparum strains, respectively; H37Rv and 18b = replicating and nonreplicating M. tuberculosis strains; RLM/MLM/HLM = rat, mouse and human
liver microsomes; CHO = Chinese hamster ovarian cells; hERG = human
ether-a-go-go-related gene; ED = effective dose; F = bioavailability; SCID = severe combined immunodeficiency.
Cell-Based Phenotypic Whole-Cell
HTS
Our cell-based phenotypic HTS screening design primarily
comprises
assessment of cell proliferation or death kinetics as end point, with
a diverse SoftFocus library[17] against P. falciparum(15) and M.
tuberculosis(18) and a low molecular
weight (MW) polar library against M. tuberculosis(19) constituting the sources of our hits.
Compared to standard empirical screening libraries, SoftFocus libraries
offer the advantage of higher hit rates since compounds in these repositories
are customized to be target-specific. On the other hand, libraries
of small polar molecules in TB drug discovery offer the advantage
of occupying a unique chemical space in terms of MW (<250 Da) and
lipophilicity (clogP < 2.5), which is incidentally also occupied
by classical TB drugs (Figure ).
Figure 4
Plot showing the unique chemical space occupied by anti-TB compounds
from low molecular weight polar libraries relative to the conventional
oral drug space of classical TB drugs.
Plot showing the unique chemical space occupied by anti-TB compounds
from low molecular weight polar libraries relative to the conventional
oral drug space of classical TB drugs.
Whole-Cell Screening Hits and Identification
of Putative Targets
While cell-based medicinal chemistry
optimization has recently successfully delivered a number of preclinical
antimalarial candidates, it has not to the same degree in TB where
cell-based structure–activity relationship (SAR) exploration
is more challenging. Thus, in TB drug discovery, it is important to
frontload mechanism of action (MoA) studies through target identification
in order to drive SAR exploration. The identification of putative
targets of hit compounds discovered through phenotypic screening ideally
needs to be conducted in parallel with hit optimization studies. In
this regard, genetic and genomic approaches have largely been successful
in target identification, especially in malaria.[20]From a whole-cell image-based screening of a BioFocus
DPI SoftFocus library of 35 000 compounds in collaboration
with MMV, we identified 222 hits with >80% inhibition at an average
primary and retest concentration of 1.82 μM against the sensitive
(3D7) and multidrug resistant (Dd2) P. falciparum strains.[17] Further, cell-based medicinal
optimization has led to the delivery of a clinical candidate, MMV390048
(1), a 2-aminopyridine,[21] and
a preclinical development candidate, UCT943 (2), from
the aminopyrazine class[22] (Figure ). Our integrated screening
cascade depicted in Figure was critical in the selection and progression of these candidates
and was propelled by the need to identify new chemical entities endowed
with novel MoA and pan-activity against all parasite life cycle stages.
The limitations of animal models were overcome in our utilization
of the humanized P. falciparumSCIDmouse model carrying
the relevant humaninfection in the assessment of 1 and 2. The SoftFocus libraries have also delivered other lead
series. For instance, the sulfoxide-based imidazopyridazine analog 3, arising from a prodrug-like strategy, was completely curative
in the P. bergheimouse model at 4 × 50 mg/kg
oral dose[23] as was the aminomethylthiazole
pyrazole carboxamide lead, 4(24) (Figure ).
Figure 5
Structures
of compounds 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Structures
of compounds 1, 2, 3, and 4.Employing genomic and chemoproteomic
strategies, we recently identified P. falciparum phosphatidylinositol
4-kinase (PfPI4K) as the target of 1.[25] In this analysis, resistant mutants
were generated through drug
pressure using 1, and whole-genome sequencing identified
nucleotide polymorphisms in PfPI4K, thus citing this
protein as the potential target of and resistance determinant of 1. Concurrent chemoproteomic mechanistic approaches using
covalent immobilization on Sepharose beads and pull-down experiments
to affinity-capture potential protein targets from blood stage extracts
revealed 1 competitively and selectively inhibited PfPI4K binding. A similar capturing experiment with kinobeads,
which represent a combination of immobilized promiscuous ATP-competitive
kinase inhibitors, showed PfPI4K as the only P. falciparum protein that exhibited a dose-dependent reduction
of bead binding upon addition of 1. Furthermore, these
chemoproteomic PfPI4K competitive-binding data strongly
correlated with antiparasitic activity. Since phosphatidylinositol
4-kinases are highly homologous across P. falciparum and P. vivax species,[26] a functional assay was conducted that also confirmed inhibition
of recombinant PvPI4K, thus corroborating the genomic
and chemoproteomic data and affirming PfPI4K as the
target of 1.Similarly, from a whole-cell screening
of a small polar library
of ∼6000 compounds against M. tuberculosis by the Novartis Institute of Tropical Diseases, phthalimide-containing
ester 5, from the pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyridine-1,3(2H)-dione series, was identified as a representative example
for further hit validation (Figure ).[19] This compound was subsequently
transformed into early lead compound 6, through optimization
of potency and microsomal metabolic stability.[19]
Figure 6
Structure of compound 5 and its derivative 6.
Structure of compound 5 and its derivative 6.Additionally, to identify the
molecular target and potential MoA
of pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyridine-1,3(2H)-diones, we explored a genetic approach by attempting to raise spontaneous
resistant mutants (SRMs) in the H37RvMa strain.[19] Although these mutant generation efforts were unsuccessful,
the series was flagged as hyperactive against a cytochrome bd oxidase deletion mutant (ΔcydKO)
through routine hit triage, which involved screening representative
compounds against known target mutants as a way to prioritize chemical
series potentially acting via novel mechanisms. Supplementary analysis
revealed that a ΔcydKO derivative strain carrying
an Ala317Thr point mutation in qcrB (encoding a subunit
of the menaquinol cytochrome c oxidoreductase) was
resistant to compounds in this series (MIC90 > 10).
Considered
in the light of the observed hypersensitivity of the ΔcydKO deletion mutant to these compounds and the cross-resistance
of the qcrBA317T-bearing ΔcydKO variant, these observations therefore strongly hinted that these
pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyridine-1,3(2H)-diones target the
QcrB subunit of the cytochrome bc1 complex, a validated
target in M. tuberculosis.[19]
Target-Based Screening
Though effective
in the identification of active compounds, an often-cited drawback
of whole-cell phenotypic screening is the lack of clarity in the underlying
MoA of the hits. Target-based screening navigates this pitfall by
employing simple biochemical assays where specific binding or affinity
of inhibitors to target is investigated in reactions that mimic and
miniaturize real-time physiological events. In this regard, we have
explored inhibition of such targets as the heme detoxification pathway,
falcipain 2 (PfFP2) and dihydroorotate dehydrogenase
(PfDHODH).
Hits from Target-Based
Screening and Identification
of Putative Targets
During the trophozoite stage of its life
cycle, P. falciparum ingests ∼80% of host
hemoglobin into its digestive vacuole (DV). As hemoglobin is degraded,
its heme component is converted into hemozoin (Hz), and globin hydrolyzed
to its constituent amino acids for protein synthesis. Hz is an inert
crystalline form of ferriprotoporphyrin IX (Fe(III)PPIX), a cytotoxic
by-product from the autoxidation of the released heme (Figure ). Hz formation in P. falciparum represents an attractive antimalarial drug
target since it is unique to the parasite, critical to its survival,
accessible to drugs, and not genome-coded (hence immutable). Expectedly,
its inhibition through canonical aminoquinolines and other heme-targeting
chemotypes has therefore been of wide interest in P. falciparum and other hematophagous organisms.[27] The
crystal structure of the Fe(III)PPIX–halofantrine complex has
revealed that coordination to the iron(III) center of the heme monomer,
π–π stacking, and hydrogen bonding constitute the
key interactions between inhibitors and Fe(III)PPIX.[28] We have employed a pyridine-based cell-free system that
mirrors the lipid-mediated process in the DV by substituting neutral
lipids with the lipophilic Nonidet P-40 detergent to assess how different
scaffolds inhibit β-hematin (abiotic Hz) formation[29−31] and used this as surrogate for Hz inhibition in the parasite. To
further validate if the hits in the lipid-based assay are indeed bonafide
inhibitors of Hz formation, a within-cell fractionation assay that
examines the effect of β-hematin inhibitors on the fate of total
heme in the parasite when ring stage cultures are treated with increasing
doses was utilized. In true inhibitors, this is typified by a dose-dependent
signature of decreasing Hz fraction matched by a corresponding increase
in toxic free heme and hemoglobin.[32] We
have recently validated this screen in non-quinoline based scaffolds
to illustrate the Hz-inhibiting potential of pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazoles (7)[33] and
benzamides (8)[34] (Figure ).
Figure 7
A schematic depiction
of the hemoglobin degradation pathway, hemozoin
formation and role of proteases in P. falciparum as
described in section .
Figure 8
Parasite survival curve directly corresponding
to a dose-dependent
accumulation of toxic heme, validating inhibition of cellular hemozoin
formation as target of pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazole
(7) and benzamide (8) hits against P. falciparum.
A schematic depiction
of the hemoglobin degradation pathway, hemozoin
formation and role of proteases in P. falciparum as
described in section .Parasite survival curve directly corresponding
to a dose-dependent
accumulation of toxic heme, validating inhibition of cellular hemozoin
formation as target of pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazole
(7) and benzamide (8) hits against P. falciparum.Since hemoglobin hydrolysis is the result of a concerted
process
involving multiple catalytic proteases, including aspartic, metallo-,
and cysteine proteases[35] (Figure ), plasmodial cysteine proteases
involved in hemoglobin catabolism have also been interesting antimalarial
drug targets due to the role of hemoglobin degradation as an intraerythrocytic
source of nutrition and space. The parasite cysteine protease falcipain
2, PfFP2, is a papain family cysteine protease and
a crucial hemoglobinase whose inhibition leads to parasite death,
presumably due to blockage of hemoglobin hydrolysis.[36] Studies to examine the activity of chalcones,[30] thiazolidinediones,[37] thiosemicarbazones,[38] and 4-aminoquinoline
isatin derivatives[39] against PfFP2 have been explored in our laboratories.Our target-based
screens have also included analysis of the parasite
dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, PfDHODH, which catalyzes
the rate-limiting step of de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis
(Figure ). Pyrimidine
is an essential constituent of nucleic acids and requisite in protein
glycosylation, membrane lipid biosynthesis, and strand-break repair.[40] The absence of a pyrimidine-salvage pathway
in P. falciparum suggests an absolute parasite reliance
on de novo synthesis, consequently leading to the
validity of PfDHODH as target for antiplasmodial
small molecules.[41] Using 3D quantitative
SAR pharmacophore models, molecular docking, and enzyme inhibition
experiments on PfDHODH, we recently identified new
inhibitors of this enzyme based on a dihydrothiophenone scaffold.[42] Since the crystal structures of PfDHODH in complex with diverse inhibitors have been determined,[43,44] insights into the structural basis for inhibition by such newly
identified small molecules can therefore be understood.
Figure 9
Schematic view
of the sequential enzymatic reactions for de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis in P. falciparum with selective
inhibition of PfDHODH (red) able
to block the necessary transfer of electrons into the second half
of the pathway.
Schematic view
of the sequential enzymatic reactions for de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis in P. falciparum with selective
inhibition of PfDHODH (red) able
to block the necessary transfer of electrons into the second half
of the pathway.As a caveat, however,
the application of target-based screening
is limited since not all targets can be purified or prepared in a
manner suitable for biochemical evaluation. Additionally, signals
from biochemical assays can only capture the physiological landscape
involved in intracellular drug activity and tissue-specific responses
to a limited degree of fidelity. In fact, it is not uncommon for target-based
screening hits to completely lack whole-cell activity or kill through
an entirely unrelated target.[45] Relatably,
target-based identification of new leads against M. tuberculosis has been largely unsuccessful as most hits are inactive in vivo
due to either lack of cellular permeation or functional redundancy
of target during infection.
Conclusion
and Future Prospects
Significant milestones have been achieved
toward overcoming some
of the aforementioned challenges associated with limitations of animal
models. Of particular note is the development of diverse strains of
immunodeficientmice on the mutant Il2rg platform,
in the appreciation that no single specific model suffices in addressing
the myriad of drug efficacy queries. Indeed, the successful transitioning
of our candidate drug 1 into clinical testing had hinged
on the successful exploitation of the humanized SCIDmouse model carrying
the relevant humaninfection.[25] Nonetheless,
discourse on other considerations is noteworthy. First, most current
screening libraries comprise a limited number of chemical scaffolds;
an expansion of the antimalarial and anti-TB chemical spaces with
novel, biologically relevant chemical matter seldom addressed in conventional
screening collections is therefore imperative. One approach involves
more intensive research on natural products whose inherent bioactivity
confers them high affinity, specificity, relatively favorable pharmacokinetic
properties, and hydrophilicity.[46] More
library assemblies predicated on natural product privileged structures,
like indoles, have the potential to widen the chemical space in malaria
and TB drug discovery. Chemical space expansion could also invoke
the concept of diversity-oriented synthesis, which employs divergent
synthetic steps where the product of one complexity-generating transformation
is a substrate in the next, subsequently affording structures with
increased scaffold complexity better suited to probe broader biological
spaces.[47]Correspondingly, expansion
of the druggable space is worth considering.
In practice, a target is regarded truly validated when its inhibitor
is used in the clinic for treating human disease. The product profile
to build such targets would therefore comprise essentiality for organism
viability in humans, complete cidality at low-concentration inhibition,
and amenability to inhibition by small molecules having the appropriate
physiochemical properties. Despite the completion of the P.
falciparum and M. tuberculosis genomes and
a growing understanding of the organisms’ biological landscape,
few targets have been clinically validated. For instance, only tubulin
β-chain, adenosine diaminase, dihydrofolate reductase–thymidylate
synthase, topoisomerase I, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, flavoprotein
subunit of succinate dehydrogenase, and inosine-5′-monophosphate
dehydrogenase code for currently validated drug targets among the
∼5300 protein-encoding genes in P. falciparum. Similarly, only nine (cmaA1, cyp51, embA, embB, embC, folK, InhA,
katG, and rpoC) of the 3999 proteins encoded by M. tuberculosis have been pharmaceutically investigated.[48] This paucity in druggable targets invites research into expanding
the targetable biological space in M. tuberculosis and P. falciparum. Some of the spaces as yet untargeted
by known antimalarials include lipid metabolism, which is almost nonfunctional
in uninfected erythrocytes and thus unique to P. falciparum. Protein kinases also constitute an appealing target class due to
the well-established binding of small molecules to their catalytic
clefts and the indispensability of protein phosphorylation in regulating
parasite physiology. The availability of genomic/proteomic data, protein
crystal structures, bioinformatics infrastructure, and protein networks
as well as modeling programs have tremendously facilitated target
prediction in both pathogens. However, caution must be urged on predictive
analyses to guard against overestimation of the possible number of
drug targets the parasite genomes could encode. For instance, using
a computational algorithm that identified enzymes that catalyze “chokepoint”
reactions, only ∼200 P. falciparum genes (4%)
were estimated to encode potentially suitable targets, and among these,
only ∼30 shared no significant homology with any human enzyme.[49] Absence of significant homology is, however,
not an absolute requisite for target identification; since a single
amino acid change can theoretically confer selectivity, much as generate
high level resistance as illustrated by bumped kinase inhibitors whose
“bumps” offer selectivity by precluding their binding
to almost all mammalian kinases, which characteristically have bulky
gatekeeper residues in their ATP-binding pockets.[50]Finally, the success of phenotypic whole-cell screening
in steering
antimalarial and anti-TB drug discovery in recent years is noteworthy.
This approach has recently yielded thousands of antiplasmodial and
anti-TB hits that have proven to be useful starting points for medicinal
chemistry optimization.[7−9] Moreover, whole-cell screening on ∼20 000
diverse small molecules from the Broad Institute collection against M. tuberculosis recently revealed only slight overlap in
molecules effective against M. tuberculosis and related
species,[51] thus highlighting the utility
of direct screening against the organism. However, the approach is
not without shortcomings. First, the parasite species, strain, and
life cycle stage must be clinically relevant, and in vitro maintenance
of the biological cultures must be able to produce sufficient quantities
for the phenotype needed for HTS. Second, considerations must be made
on the choice of the best-suited assay platforms, their optimization,
and the interpretation of signals obtained. Lastly, lead optimization
efforts are unlikely to ride on a single-target-inhibition hypothesis
as there may be multiple targets, and thus the need for more than
one assay to guard against potential off-target-related compound activities.
Nonetheless, these override the hallmark demerit of target-based approaches,
which is the discordance between inhibition of recombinant systems
and translation into whole-cell activity or clinical efficacy. In
conclusion, advances in plasmodial and mycobacterial genetics, chemical
biology, -omics, and other techniques now provide a platform that
permits the merits of both approaches to be effectively harnessed
to populate the antimalarial and anti-TB drug pipelines with high-quality
leads.
Authors: Harald Noedl; Youry Se; Kurt Schaecher; Bryan L Smith; Duong Socheat; Mark M Fukuda Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Fernanda A Oliveira; Ana Claudia S Pinto; Caique L Duarte; Alex G Taranto; Eder Lorenzato Junior; Cleydson Finotti Cordeiro; Diogo T Carvalho; Fernando P Varotti; Amanda L Fonseca Journal: BMC Chem Date: 2022-07-09
Authors: James M Murithi; Edward S Owen; Eva S Istvan; Marcus C S Lee; Sabine Ottilie; Kelly Chibale; Daniel E Goldberg; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Manuel Llinás; David A Fidock; Manu Vanaerschot Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 8.116
Authors: James M Murithi; Ioanna Deni; Charisse Flerida A Pasaje; John Okombo; Jessica L Bridgford; Nina F Gnädig; Rachel L Edwards; Tomas Yeo; Sachel Mok; Anna Y Burkhard; Olivia Coburn-Flynn; Eva S Istvan; Tomoyo Sakata-Kato; Maria G Gomez-Lorenzo; Annie N Cowell; Kathryn J Wicht; Claire Le Manach; Gavreel F Kalantarov; Sumanta Dey; Maëlle Duffey; Benoît Laleu; Amanda K Lukens; Sabine Ottilie; Manu Vanaerschot; Ilya N Trakht; Francisco-Javier Gamo; Dyann F Wirth; Daniel E Goldberg; Audrey R Odom John; Kelly Chibale; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Jacquin C Niles; David A Fidock Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 9.039