Literature DB >> 17246224

A Test for Rare Male Mating Advantage with DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA Karyotypes.

W W Anderson1, C J Brown.   

Abstract

Recent work has called into question the reality of the rare male mating advantage, pointing out that it could be a statistical artifact of marking flies for behavioral observation or of experimental bias in collecting males. We designed an experiment to test for rare male mating advantage that avoids these sources of bias. Large numbers of males of three Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes were allowed to mate with females of one karyotype in population cages. The females were then isolated before multiple mating occurred and their progeny used to diagnose the males that mated them. Populations were studied at five sets of male karyotypic frequencies. The mating success of the male homokaryotypes ST/ST and CH/CH, relative to that of the heterokaryotype ST/CH, was frequency dependent. Both ST/ST and CH/CH males displayed a statistically significant mating advantage at low frequency by comparision with their mating success in the midrange of karyotypic frequencies. Both male homokaryotypes also showed a significantly greater mating success at high homokaryotypic frequency than at intermediate frequencies, which is the same as saying that the heterokaryotype not only failed to show a rare male advantage but actually suffered a mating disadvantage at low frequency. We conclude that rare male mating advantage is not always an experimental or methodological artifact but does occur in laboratory populations of D. pseudoobscura. It may occur for some genotypes and not for others, however, and it may be only one of several forms of frequency-dependent mating behavior operating in a population.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 17246224      PMCID: PMC1202378     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  7 in total

1.  Does the rare male advantage result from faulty experimental design?

Authors:  J E Leonard; L Ehrman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimators for viability in experimental populations, their variances and covarinaces.

Authors:  P Stam
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Genetics of natural populations. XXXIX. A test of the possible influence of two insecticides on the chromosomal polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  W W Anderson; C Oshima; T Watanabe; T Dobzhansky; O Pavlovsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  W W Anderson; L Levine; O Olvera; J R Powell; M E de la Rosa; V M Salceda; M I Gaso; J Guzmán
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Gene Frequency Changes at the alpha-Amylase Locus in Experimental Populations of DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.

Authors:  D G Yardley; W W Anderson; H E Schaffer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A rare-male advantage in the housefly induced by wing clipping and some general considerations for Drosophila.

Authors:  E H Bryant; A Kence; K T Kimball
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Selection by fertility in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  W W Anderson; T K Watanabe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 4.562

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Models of general frequency-dependent selection and mating-interaction effects and the analysis of selection patterns in Drosophila inversion polymorphisms.

Authors:  José M Alvarez-Castro; Gonzalo Alvarez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rare-male mating advantage: an artifact caused by differential storage conditions?

Authors:  P Knoppien
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Mating patterns of different Adh genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Testing rare-male mating advantage.

Authors:  J A Sanchez Prado; G Blanco Lizana
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Rare male mating advantage in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  V M Salceda; W W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Relative effects of female fecundity and male mating success on fertility selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  M M Brockett; H Alavi; W W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.