Literature DB >> 19387847

Rapid response to perturbation of chromosome frequencies in natural populations of Drosophila robusta.

Max Levitan1, William J Etges.   

Abstract

Perturbation of gene or chromosome frequencies in natural populations is one of the most powerful ways of demonstrating whether natural selection maintains genetic polymorphism or if other evolutionary forces are at work. Gene arrangement frequencies in two natural populations of Drosophila robusta were perturbed multiple times by releasing adult flies with contrasting karyotypes and carefully monitoring post-perturbation presence of hybrids and chromosome frequencies. In all cases, frequencies quickly returned to pre-perturbation levels, and in the following sampling periods, no evidence of the introduced chromosomes was apparent. Analysis of post-perturbation frequency changes included tests for heterogeneity among chromosome arrangements in rates of return to equilibrium values using population admixture analysis. In several cases, significant heterogeneity was detected indicating some form of natural selection was operating. Technical challenges to carrying out perturbation experiments in the wild are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19387847     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-009-9364-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  15 in total

Review 1.  Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild.

Authors:  H E Hoekstra; J M Hoekstra; D Berrigan; S N Vignieri; A Hoang; C E Hill; P Beerli; J G Kingsolver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The population genetics of Drosophila robusta.

Authors:  H L CARSON
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  1958       Impact factor: 1.944

3.  The Effects of Inversions on Crossing over in Drosophila Robusta.

Authors:  H L Carson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1953-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Four decades of inversion polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  W W Anderson; J Arnold; D G Baldwin; A T Beckenbach; C J Brown; S H Bryant; J A Coyne; L G Harshman; W B Heed; D E Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Admixture studies and the detection of selection.

Authors:  J Adams; R H Ward
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  W W Anderson; L Levine; O Olvera; J R Powell; M E de la Rosa; V M Salceda; M I Gaso; J Guzmán
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF DROSOPHILA BUZZATII. VIII. EVIDENCE FOR ENDOCYCLIC SELECTION ACTING ON THE INVERSION POLYMORPHISM IN A NATURAL POPULATION.

Authors:  A Ruiz; A Fontdevila; M Santos; M Seoane; E Torroja
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  The rise and fall of the Carbonaria form of the peppered moth.

Authors:  Laurence M Cook
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.875

9.  Gene flow and the geographical distribution of a molecular polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  J S Jones; S H Bryant; R C Lewontin; J A Moore; T Prout
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Perturbation of gene frequencies in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for selection at the Adh locus.

Authors:  J A McKenzie; S W McKechnie; P Batterham
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.