Literature DB >> 4426507

Selection by fertility in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

W W Anderson, T K Watanabe.   

Abstract

Fertility, the component of selection due to female fecundity and male mating success, differed significantly among the ST/ST, ST/AR, and AR/AR karyotypes in experimental populations and varied with karyotypic frequency. In relation to ST/AR, ST/ST females and males had higher fertilities at low frequency; AR/AR males and females were at a significant fertility disadvantage at intermediate frequency, while at low and at high frequencies their fertilities matched or exceeded that of the heterokaryotype. These fertility differences were comparable in size to viability differences previously reported for D. pseudoobscura karyotypes. Differential fertility seems likely to be an important element, perhaps just as important as differential viability, in the balancing selection that maintains the chromosomal polymorphism in this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4426507      PMCID: PMC1213147     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  3 in total

1.  Differential Fertility in Population Genetics Models.

Authors:  W F Bodmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Viability versus Fecundity Selection in the Slender Wild Oat, Avena barbata L.

Authors:  M T Clegg; R W Allard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Dynamics of polymorphisms. I. Selection components in an experimental population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Bundgaard; F B Christiansen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total
  12 in total

1.  Enzymes and reproduction in natural populations of Drosophila euronotus.

Authors:  H D Stalker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Models of general frequency-dependent selection and mating-interaction effects and the analysis of selection patterns in Drosophila inversion polymorphisms.

Authors:  José M Alvarez-Castro; Gonzalo Alvarez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Alloprocoptic selection: A mode of natural selection promoting polymorphism.

Authors:  J M Serradilla; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of the "Sex-Ratio" Polymorphism in DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.

Authors:  J W Curtsinger; M W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Conditions for protected inversion polymorphism under supergene selection.

Authors:  G Alvarez; C Zapata
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Rare male mating advantage in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  V M Salceda; W W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  W W Anderson; L Levine; O Olvera; J R Powell; M E de la Rosa; V M Salceda; M I Gaso; J Guzmán
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Modes of Selection Maintaining an Inversion Polymorphism in DROSOPHILA PAULISTORUM.

Authors:  M H Gromko; R C Richmond
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A Test for Rare Male Mating Advantage with DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA Karyotypes.

Authors:  W W Anderson; C J Brown
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Relative effects of female fecundity and male mating success on fertility selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  M M Brockett; H Alavi; W W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.