Literature DB >> 28611213

Spacer capture and integration by a type I-F Cas1-Cas2-3 CRISPR adaptation complex.

Robert D Fagerlund1, Max E Wilkinson1,2, Oleg Klykov3,4, Arjan Barendregt3,4, F Grant Pearce5,6, Sebastian N Kieper1, Howard W R Maxwell1, Angela Capolupo3,4, Albert J R Heck3,4, Kurt L Krause2, Mihnea Bostina1,7, Richard A Scheltema3,4, Raymond H J Staals1, Peter C Fineran8.   

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems capture DNA fragments from invading bacteriophages and plasmids and integrate them as spacers into bacterial CRISPR arrays. In type I-E and II-A CRISPR-Cas systems, this adaptation process is driven by Cas1-Cas2 complexes. Type I-F systems, however, contain a unique fusion of Cas2, with the type I effector helicase and nuclease for invader destruction, Cas3. By using biochemical, structural, and biophysical methods, we present a structural model of the 400-kDa Cas14-Cas2-32 complex from Pectobacterium atrosepticum with bound protospacer substrate DNA. Two Cas1 dimers assemble on a Cas2 domain dimeric core, which is flanked by two Cas3 domains forming a groove where the protospacer binds to Cas1-Cas2. We developed a sensitive in vitro assay and demonstrated that Cas1-Cas2-3 catalyzed spacer integration into CRISPR arrays. The integrase domain of Cas1 was necessary, whereas integration was independent of the helicase or nuclease activities of Cas3. Integration required at least partially duplex protospacers with free 3'-OH groups, and leader-proximal integration was stimulated by integration host factor. In a coupled capture and integration assay, Cas1-Cas2-3 processed and integrated protospacers independent of Cas3 activity. These results provide insight into the structure of protospacer-bound type I Cas1-Cas2-3 adaptation complexes and their integration mechanism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR-Cas; horizontal gene transfer; mass spectrometry; phage resistance; spacer acquisition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28611213      PMCID: PMC5495228          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1618421114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  61 in total

1.  EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions.

Authors:  S J Ludtke; P R Baldwin; W Chiu
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy.

Authors:  Joseph A Mindell; Nikolaus Grigorieff
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 3.  CRISPR-Cas adaptation: insights into the mechanism of action.

Authors:  Gil Amitai; Rotem Sorek
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Csy4 is responsible for CRISPR RNA processing in Pectobacterium atrosepticum.

Authors:  Rita Przybilski; Corinna Richter; Tamzin Gristwood; James S Clulow; Reuben B Vercoe; Peter C Fineran
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 5.  CRISPR-Cas: Adapting to change.

Authors:  Simon A Jackson; Rebecca E McKenzie; Robert D Fagerlund; Sebastian N Kieper; Peter C Fineran; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Adaptation in CRISPR-Cas Systems.

Authors:  Samuel H Sternberg; Hagen Richter; Emmanuelle Charpentier; Udi Qimron
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors:  Kira S Makarova; Yuri I Wolf; Omer S Alkhnbashi; Fabrizio Costa; Shiraz A Shah; Sita J Saunders; Rodolphe Barrangou; Stan J J Brouns; Emmanuelle Charpentier; Daniel H Haft; Philippe Horvath; Sylvain Moineau; Francisco J M Mojica; Rebecca M Terns; Michael P Terns; Malcolm F White; Alexander F Yakunin; Roger A Garrett; John van der Oost; Rolf Backofen; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Cas1-Cas2 complex formation mediates spacer acquisition during CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity.

Authors:  James K Nuñez; Philip J Kranzusch; Jonas Noeske; Addison V Wright; Christopher W Davies; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  Optimized negative staining: a high-throughput protocol for examining small and asymmetric protein structure by electron microscopy.

Authors:  Matthew Rames; Yadong Yu; Gang Ren
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination.

Authors:  Sjors H W Scheres
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.867

View more
  45 in total

1.  Cas4 Nucleases Define the PAM, Length, and Orientation of DNA Fragments Integrated at CRISPR Loci.

Authors:  Masami Shiimori; Sandra C Garrett; Brenton R Graveley; Michael P Terns
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Spermidine strongly increases the fidelity of Escherichia coli CRISPR Cas1-Cas2 integrase.

Authors:  Pierre Plateau; Clara Moch; Sylvain Blanquet
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  How bacteria control the CRISPR-Cas arsenal.

Authors:  Lina M Leon; Senén D Mendoza; Joseph Bondy-Denomy
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 4.  Structures and Strategies of Anti-CRISPR-Mediated Immune Suppression.

Authors:  Tanner Wiegand; Shweta Karambelkar; Joseph Bondy-Denomy; Blake Wiedenheft
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 15.500

5.  Fidelity of prespacer capture and processing is governed by the PAM-mediated interactions of Cas1-2 adaptation complex in CRISPR-Cas type I-E system.

Authors:  Kakimani Nagarajan Yoganand; Manasasri Muralidharan; Siddharth Nimkar; Baskaran Anand
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Casposase structure and the mechanistic link between DNA transposition and spacer acquisition by CRISPR-Cas.

Authors:  Alison B Hickman; Shweta Kailasan; Pavol Genzor; Astrid D Haase; Fred Dyda
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Processing and integration of functionally oriented prespacers in the Escherichia coli CRISPR system depends on bacterial host exonucleases.

Authors:  Anita Ramachandran; Lesley Summerville; Brian A Learn; Lily DeBell; Scott Bailey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Structures of the CRISPR genome integration complex.

Authors:  Addison V Wright; Jun-Jie Liu; Gavin J Knott; Kevin W Doxzen; Eva Nogales; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Cas4-Dependent Prespacer Processing Ensures High-Fidelity Programming of CRISPR Arrays.

Authors:  Hayun Lee; Yi Zhou; David W Taylor; Dipali G Sashital
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Assembly and Translocation of a CRISPR-Cas Primed Acquisition Complex.

Authors:  Kaylee E Dillard; Maxwell W Brown; Nicole V Johnson; Yibei Xiao; Adam Dolan; Erik Hernandez; Samuel D Dahlhauser; Yoori Kim; Logan R Myler; Eric V Anslyn; Ailong Ke; Ilya J Finkelstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.