Literature DB >> 31748409

Fidelity of prespacer capture and processing is governed by the PAM-mediated interactions of Cas1-2 adaptation complex in CRISPR-Cas type I-E system.

Kakimani Nagarajan Yoganand1, Manasasri Muralidharan1, Siddharth Nimkar1, Baskaran Anand2.   

Abstract

Prokaryotes deploy CRISPR-Cas-based RNA-guided adaptive immunity to fend off mobile genetic elements such as phages and plasmids. During CRISPR adaptation, which is the first stage of CRISPR immunity, the Cas1-2 integrase complex captures invader-derived prespacer DNA and specifically integrates it at the leader-repeat junction as spacers. For this integration, several variants of CRISPR-Cas systems use Cas4 as an indispensable nuclease for selectively processing the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) containing prespacers to a defined length. Surprisingly, however, a few CRISPR-Cas systems, such as type I-E, are bereft of Cas4. Despite the absence of Cas4, how the prespacers show impeccable conservation for length and PAM selection in type I-E remains intriguing. Here, using in vivo and in vitro integration assays, deep sequencing, and exonuclease footprinting, we show that Cas1-2/I-E-via the type I-E-specific extended C-terminal tail of Cas1-displays intrinsic affinity for PAM containing prespacers of variable length in Escherichia coli Although Cas1-2/I-E does not prune the prespacers, its binding protects the prespacer boundaries from exonuclease action. This ensures the pruning of exposed ends by exonucleases to aptly sized substrates for integration into the CRISPR locus. In summary, our work reveals that in a few CRISPR-Cas variants, such as type I-E, the specificity of PAM selection resides with Cas1-2, whereas the prespacer processing is co-opted by cellular non-Cas exonucleases, thereby offsetting the need for Cas4.
© 2019 Yoganand et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR adaptation; CRISPR-Cas; Cas1; Cas1-Cas2; Cas2; Escherichia coli (E. coli); bacterial immunity; exonuclease; microbiology; molecular biology; prespacer integration; prespacer processing; protein-DNA interaction; protein-nucleic acid interaction; protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31748409      PMCID: PMC6937570          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  90 in total

1.  Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Bernd Zetsche; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Omar O Abudayyeh; Ian M Slaymaker; Kira S Makarova; Patrick Essletzbichler; Sara E Volz; Julia Joung; John van der Oost; Aviv Regev; Eugene V Koonin; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Rodolphe Barrangou; Christophe Fremaux; Hélène Deveau; Melissa Richards; Patrick Boyaval; Sylvain Moineau; Dennis A Romero; Philippe Horvath
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Cas4 Nucleases Can Effect Specific Integration of CRISPR Spacers.

Authors:  Zhufeng Zhang; Saifu Pan; Tao Liu; Yingjun Li; Nan Peng
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Imprecise Spacer Acquisition Generates CRISPR-Cas Immune Diversity through Primed Adaptation.

Authors:  Simon A Jackson; Nils Birkholz; Lucía M Malone; Peter C Fineran
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 21.023

5.  CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA.

Authors:  Luciano A Marraffini; Erik J Sontheimer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A Reverse Transcriptase-Cas1 Fusion Protein Contains a Cas6 Domain Required for Both CRISPR RNA Biogenesis and RNA Spacer Acquisition.

Authors:  Georg Mohr; Sukrit Silas; Jennifer L Stamos; Kira S Makarova; Laura M Markham; Jun Yao; Patricia Lucas-Elío; Antonio Sanchez-Amat; Andrew Z Fire; Eugene V Koonin; Alan M Lambowitz
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  CRISPR interference directs strand specific spacer acquisition.

Authors:  Daan C Swarts; Cas Mosterd; Mark W J van Passel; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA.

Authors:  Asaf Levy; Moran G Goren; Ido Yosef; Oren Auster; Miriam Manor; Gil Amitai; Rotem Edgar; Udi Qimron; Rotem Sorek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Detection and characterization of spacer integration intermediates in type I-E CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Zihni Arslan; Veronica Hermanns; Reinhild Wurm; Rolf Wagner; Ümit Pul
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Cas9 function and host genome sampling in Type II-A CRISPR-Cas adaptation.

Authors:  Yunzhou Wei; Rebecca M Terns; Michael P Terns
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Digging into the lesser-known aspects of CRISPR biology.

Authors:  Noemí M Guzmán; Belén Esquerra-Ruvira; Francisco J M Mojica
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.479

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.