Literature DB >> 28597151

Outcomes and prognostic factors for relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients in phase I clinical trials.

Jean-Marie Michot1,2,3,4, Lina Benajiba5, Laura Faivre6, Capucine Baldini5, Lelia Haddag7, Clement Bonnet5, Christophe Massard5, Frederic Bigot5, Camille Bigenwald8, Benjamin Verret5, Zoé A P Thomas5, Andrea Varga5, Anas Gazzah5, Antoine Hollebecque5, David Ghez8, Julien Lazarovici8, Rastilav Balheda5, Aurore Jeanson5, Sophie Postel-Vinay5, Alina Danu8, Jean-Charles Soria5, Xavier Paoletti6, Vincent Ribrag5,7,6,8.   

Abstract

Background Although safety and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) have been extensively studied in Phase I clinical trials on patients with solid tumours, data on lymphoma trials are scarce. Here, we investigated safety, outcomes and prognostic factors in relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients included in a series of Phase I trials. Method and patients All consecutive adult patients with recurrent/refractory lymphoma enrolled in 26 Phase I trials at a single cancer centre in France between January 2008 and June 2016 were retrospectively assessed. Results 133 patients (males: 65%) were included in the analysis. The median (range) age was 65 (23-86). Aggressive non-Hodgkin, indolent non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin types accounted for 64%, 25% and 11% of the patients, respectively. The patients had received a median (range) of 3 (1-13) lines of treatment prior to trial entry. The median [95% confidence interval] progression-free survival and OS times were 3.0 [1.8-3.6] and 17.8 [12.7-30.4] months, respectively. High-grade toxicity (grade 3 or higher, according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events classification) was experienced by 56 of the 133 patients (42%) and was related to the investigational drug in 44 of these cases (79%). No toxicity-related deaths occurred. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was encountered in 11 (9%) of the 116 evaluable patients. High-grade toxicity occurred during the DLT period for 34 of the 56 patients (61%) and after the DLT period in the remaining 22 (39%). The main prognostic factors for poor OS were the histological type (i.e. tumour aggressiveness), an elevated serum LDH level, and a low serum albumin level. Early withdrawal from a trial was correlated with the performance status score, the histological type and the serum LDH level. The overall objective response and disease control rates were 24% and 57%, respectively. Conclusion Performance status, LDH, albumin and histological type (tumour aggressiveness) appear to be the most relevant prognostic factors for enrolling Phase I participants with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. 39% of the patients experienced a first high-grade toxic event after the dose-limiting toxicity period, suggesting that the conventional concept of dose-limiting toxicity (designed for chemotherapy) should be redefined in the era of modern cancer therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-limiting toxicity; Phase I clinical trial; Recommended phase II dose; Relapsed and refractory lymphoma; Study design

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28597151     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-017-0480-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  21 in total

1.  Redefining dose-limiting toxicity.

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-02

2.  Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Carlos Gomez-Roca; L Rhoda Molife; Bhavesh Anghan; Antonin Levy; Ian Judson; Johann De Bono; Jean-Charles Soria; Stan Kaye; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prognostic factors and outcome of patients with hematological malignancies in phase I trials: the Gustave Roussy scoring system.

Authors:  Lina Benajiba; Jean-Marie Michot; Capucine Baldini; Laura Faivre; Andrea Varga; Rastilav Balheda; Anas Gazzah; Ecaterina Ileana; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Christophe Massard; Stéphane de Botton; Jean-Charles Soria; Vincent Ribrag
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.248

5.  Prognostic significance of maximum tumour (bulk) diameter in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP-like chemotherapy with or without rituximab: an exploratory analysis of the MabThera International Trial Group (MInT) study.

Authors:  Michael Pfreundschuh; Anthony D Ho; Eva Cavallin-Stahl; Max Wolf; Ruth Pettengell; Ingrid Vasova; Andrew Belch; Jan Walewski; Pier-Luigi Zinzani; Walter Mingrone; Stein Kvaloy; Ofer Shpilberg; Ulrich Jaeger; Mads Hansen; Claudia Corrado; Adriana Scheliga; Markus Loeffler; Evelyn Kuhnt
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Treatment outcome and survival in participants of phase I oncology trials carried out from 2003 to 2006 at Institut Gustave Roussy.

Authors:  A Italiano; C Massard; R Bahleda; A-L Vataire; E Deutsch; N Magné; J-P Pignon; G Vassal; J-P Armand; J-C Soria
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Towards new methods for the determination of dose limiting toxicities and the assessment of the recommended dose for further studies of molecularly targeted agents--dose-Limiting Toxicity and Toxicity Assessment Recommendation Group for Early Trials of Targeted therapies, an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-led study.

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti; Elisa Rizzo; Christophe Massard; David Olmos; Camilla Fowst; Bernard Levy; Pierre Mancini; Denis Lacombe; Percy Ivy; Lesley Seymour; Christophe Le Tourneau; Lillian L Siu; Stan B Kaye; Jaap Verweij; Jean-Charles Soria
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Prospective validation of a prognostic score to improve patient selection for oncology phase I trials.

Authors:  Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau; Jorge Barriuso; David Olmos; Joo Ern Ang; Johann de Bono; Ian Judson; Stan Kaye
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Survival of patients in a Phase 1 Clinic: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  Jennifer Wheler; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David Hong; Aung Naing; Tiffiny Jackson; Suyu Liu; Lei Feng; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Phase 0 clinical trials in oncology new drug development.

Authors:  Umesh Chandra Gupta; Sandeep Bhatia; Amit Garg; Amit Sharma; Vaibhav Choudhary
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2011-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Epigenetic Regulation of miR-92a and TET2 and Their Association in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Esther K Elliott; Lloyd N Hopkins; Robert Hensen; Heidi G Sutherland; Larisa M Haupt; Lyn R Griffiths
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.