BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced malignancies for whom standard therapy is ineffective may participate in phase 1 trials. To gain a better understanding of the clinical features that could influence benefit versus risk, the authors of this report assessed prognostic factors and survival for patients who were referred to a phase 1 clinic focused primarily on targeted agents. METHODS: The medical records of 200 sequential patients who presented to the Phase 1 Clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed, and their characteristics and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 58 years (range, 12-85 years), and 57% of patients were men. The median number of prior therapies was 4. Of 200 patients, 182 were treated on at least 1 phase 1 clinical trial. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 21 months, and the median overall survival was 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4-10.8). In univariate analysis, the factors that predicted shorter survival were primary tumor in the gastrointestinal tract; a history of thrombosis, liver metastases, and elevated levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase; platelet count; carbohydrate antigen 9 (Ca19-9) and Ca-125 levels; aspartate aminotransferase levels, and alkaline phosphatase levels (P < .05 for each). In multivariate analysis, independent factors that predicted shorter survival were a history of thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; 95% CI, 1.29-4.39; P = .005), platelets >or=440 x 10(9)/L (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.12-2.65; P = .014), and the presence of liver metastases (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09-2.09; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were referred to phase 1 studies had a short median survival (9 months). Patients with thrombocytosis, liver metastases, and a history of thromboembolism had worse outcomes. A prognostic score is proposed. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND:Patients with advanced malignancies for whom standard therapy is ineffective may participate in phase 1 trials. To gain a better understanding of the clinical features that could influence benefit versus risk, the authors of this report assessed prognostic factors and survival for patients who were referred to a phase 1 clinic focused primarily on targeted agents. METHODS: The medical records of 200 sequential patients who presented to the Phase 1 Clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed, and their characteristics and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 58 years (range, 12-85 years), and 57% of patients were men. The median number of prior therapies was 4. Of 200 patients, 182 were treated on at least 1 phase 1 clinical trial. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 21 months, and the median overall survival was 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4-10.8). In univariate analysis, the factors that predicted shorter survival were primary tumor in the gastrointestinal tract; a history of thrombosis, liver metastases, and elevated levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase; platelet count; carbohydrate antigen 9 (Ca19-9) and Ca-125 levels; aspartate aminotransferase levels, and alkaline phosphatase levels (P < .05 for each). In multivariate analysis, independent factors that predicted shorter survival were a history of thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; 95% CI, 1.29-4.39; P = .005), platelets >or=440 x 10(9)/L (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.12-2.65; P = .014), and the presence of liver metastases (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09-2.09; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS:Patients who were referred to phase 1 studies had a short median survival (9 months). Patients with thrombocytosis, liver metastases, and a history of thromboembolism had worse outcomes. A prognostic score is proposed. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Rabih Said; Razelle Kurzrock; Aung Naing; David S Hong; Siqing Fu; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Jennifer J Wheler; Filip Janku; Bryan K Kee; Savita Bidyasar; Joann Lim; Michael Wallace; Apostolia M Tsimberidou Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Rajul K Jain; J Jack Lee; David Hong; Maurie Markman; Jing Gong; Aung Naing; Jennifer Wheler; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez; Kim M Hirshfield; Veronica Rojas; Robert S DiPaola; Darlene Gibbon; Mira Hellmann; Sara Isani; Aliza Leiser; Gregory M Riedlinger; Allison Wagreich; Siraj M Ali; Julia A Elvin; Vincent A Miller; Shridar Ganesan Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Christos Vaklavas; Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou; Sijin Wen; David Hong; Jennifer Wheler; Chaan S Ng; Aung Naing; Cynthia Uehara; Robert A Wolff; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jean-Marie Michot; Lina Benajiba; Laura Faivre; Capucine Baldini; Lelia Haddag; Clement Bonnet; Christophe Massard; Frederic Bigot; Camille Bigenwald; Benjamin Verret; Zoé A P Thomas; Andrea Varga; Anas Gazzah; Antoine Hollebecque; David Ghez; Julien Lazarovici; Rastilav Balheda; Aurore Jeanson; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Alina Danu; Jean-Charles Soria; Xavier Paoletti; Vincent Ribrag Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: A T Brunetto; D Sarker; D Papadatos-Pastos; R Fehrmann; S B Kaye; S Johnston; M Allen; J S De Bono; C Swanton Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou; Nancy G Iskander; David S Hong; Jennifer J Wheler; Gerald S Falchook; Siqing Fu; Sarina Piha-Paul; Aung Naing; Filip Janku; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Yang Ye; Sijin Wen; Donald Berry; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 12.531