Literature DB >> 18042834

Treatment outcome and survival in participants of phase I oncology trials carried out from 2003 to 2006 at Institut Gustave Roussy.

A Italiano1, C Massard, R Bahleda, A-L Vataire, E Deutsch, N Magné, J-P Pignon, G Vassal, J-P Armand, J-C Soria.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The oncology community usually perceives phase I oncology trials as associated with poor or limited benefits and substantial risks. There is scarce data concerning outcome and survival of patients enrolled in current phase I oncology trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all phase I oncology trials conducted by investigators from the Adult Phase I Unit at Institut Gustave Roussy from 2003 to 2006. We report data concerning patient demographics, treatment outcome, toxicity, survival and type of care after trial exit.
RESULTS: We analyzed 10 trials involving 180 participants. The overall response rate was 7.2%. Disease control (objective response plus stable disease) was achieved in 48.2% of patients. The rate of toxic death was 0.5%. In all, 38% of patients had at least one episode of grade 3 or 4 toxic events. The median progression-free survival and the median overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 8.7 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a time between diagnosis of disease and inclusion in the phase I trial > or =24 months and evidence of disease control were statistically significant predictors of improved OS.
CONCLUSION: Current phase I oncology trials are safe and are associated with clinical benefit in a substantial proportion of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18042834     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  30 in total

Review 1.  Current challenges for the early clinical development of anticancer drugs in the era of molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; Véronique Diéras; Patricia Tresca; Wulfran Cacheux; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: the critical role of phase I trials in cancer research and treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Laura A Levit; Peter C Adamson; Suanna Bruinooge; Howard A Burris; Michael A Carducci; Adam P Dicker; Mithat Gönen; Stephen M Keefe; Michael A Postow; Michael A Thompson; David M Waterhouse; Susan L Weiner; Lynn M Schuchter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Is Participation in Cancer Phase I Trials Really Therapeutic?

Authors:  Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Survival outcome and prognostic model of patients with colorectal cancer on phase 1 trials.

Authors:  Audrey E Kam; Gopichand Pendurti; Umang H Shah; Mohammad H Ghalib; Imran Chaudhary; Jennifer Chuy; Lakshmi Rajdev; Andreas Kaubisch; Santiago Aparo; Ioannis Mantzaris; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Temporal evolution of patient characteristics enrolled on phase I trials.

Authors:  Afshin Dowlati; Madappa Kundranda; Sudhir Manda; Lauren Patrick; Pingfu Fu
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Outcomes and prognostic factors for relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Michot; Lina Benajiba; Laura Faivre; Capucine Baldini; Lelia Haddag; Clement Bonnet; Christophe Massard; Frederic Bigot; Camille Bigenwald; Benjamin Verret; Zoé A P Thomas; Andrea Varga; Anas Gazzah; Antoine Hollebecque; David Ghez; Julien Lazarovici; Rastilav Balheda; Aurore Jeanson; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Alina Danu; Jean-Charles Soria; Xavier Paoletti; Vincent Ribrag
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Risks and benefits of phase I liver dysfunction studies: should patients with severe liver dysfunction be included in these trials?

Authors:  Christos Fountzilas; Selena Stuart; Brian Hernandez; Elizabeth Bowhay-Carnes; Joel Michalek; John Sarantopoulos; Anand Karnad; Sukeshi Patel; Steven Weitman; Devalingam Mahalingam
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Megestrol acetate versus metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients having exhausted all effective therapies under standard care.

Authors:  N Penel; S Clisant; E Dansin; C Desauw; M Dégardin; L Mortier; M Vanhuyse; F Bonodeau; C Fournier; J-L Cazin; A Adenis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Phase 1 clinical trials in end-stage cancer: patient understanding of trial premises and motives for participation.

Authors:  Tove Godskesen; Peter Nygren; Karin Nordin; Mats Hansson; Ulrik Kihlbom
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Survival and clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer who were treated on phase 1 clinical trials.

Authors:  Bradley R Corr; Marisa Moroney; Jeanelle Sheeder; S Gail Eckhardt; Brandon Sawyer; Kian Behbakht; Jennifer R Diamond
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.