M D Ketcha1, T de Silva1, R Han1, A Uneri2, J Goerres1, M Jacobson1, S Vogt3, G Kleinszig3, J H Siewerdsen1,2,4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 2. Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 3. Siemens Healthcare XP Division, Erlangen, Germany. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In image-guided procedures, image acquisition is often performed primarily for the task of geometrically registering information from another image dataset, rather than detection / visualization of a particular feature. While the ability to detect a particular feature in an image has been studied extensively with respect to image quality characteristics (noise, resolution) and is an ongoing, active area of research, comparatively little has been accomplished to relate such image quality characteristics to registration performance. METHODS: To establish such a framework, we derived Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) for registration accuracy, revealing the underlying dependencies on image variance and gradient strength. The CRLB was analyzed as a function of image quality factors (in particular, dose) for various similarity metrics and compared to registration accuracy using CT images of an anthropomorphic head phantom at various simulated dose levels. Performance was evaluated in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) of the registration parameters. RESULTS: Analysis of the CRLB shows two primary dependencies: 1) noise variance (related to dose); and 2) sum of squared image gradients (related to spatial resolution and image content). Comparison of the measured RMSE to the CRLB showed that the best registration method, RMSE achieved the CRLB to within an efficiency factor of 0.21, and optimal estimators followed the predicted inverse proportionality between registration performance and radiation dose. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the CRLB for image registration is an important step toward understanding and evaluating an intraoperative imaging system with respect to a registration task. While the CRLB is optimistic in absolute performance, it reveals a basis for relating the performance of registration estimators as a function of noise content and may be used to guide acquisition parameter selection (e.g., dose) for purposes of intraoperative registration.
PURPOSE: In image-guided procedures, image acquisition is often performed primarily for the task of geometrically registering information from another image dataset, rather than detection / visualization of a particular feature. While the ability to detect a particular feature in an image has been studied extensively with respect to image quality characteristics (noise, resolution) and is an ongoing, active area of research, comparatively little has been accomplished to relate such image quality characteristics to registration performance. METHODS: To establish such a framework, we derived Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) for registration accuracy, revealing the underlying dependencies on image variance and gradient strength. The CRLB was analyzed as a function of image quality factors (in particular, dose) for various similarity metrics and compared to registration accuracy using CT images of an anthropomorphic head phantom at various simulated dose levels. Performance was evaluated in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) of the registration parameters. RESULTS: Analysis of the CRLB shows two primary dependencies: 1) noise variance (related to dose); and 2) sum of squared image gradients (related to spatial resolution and image content). Comparison of the measured RMSE to the CRLB showed that the best registration method, RMSE achieved the CRLB to within an efficiency factor of 0.21, and optimal estimators followed the predicted inverse proportionality between registration performance and radiation dose. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the CRLB for image registration is an important step toward understanding and evaluating an intraoperative imaging system with respect to a registration task. While the CRLB is optimistic in absolute performance, it reveals a basis for relating the performance of registration estimators as a function of noise content and may be used to guide acquisition parameter selection (e.g., dose) for purposes of intraoperative registration.
Authors: Grace J Gang; Junghoon Lee; J Webster Stayman; Daniel J Tward; W Zbijewski; Jerry L Prince; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Michael D Ketcha; Tharindu De Silva; Runze Han; Ali Uneri; Joseph Goerres; Matthew W Jacobson; Sebastian Vogt; Gerhard Kleinszig; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 10.048