Literature DB >> 28565627

PERSPECTIVE: SPONTANEOUS DELETERIOUS MUTATION.

Michael Lynch1, Jeff Blanchard1, David Houle2, Travis Kibota3, Stewart Schultz4, Larissa Vassilieva1, John Willis1.   

Abstract

Mildly deleterious mutation has been invoked as a leading explanation for a diverse array of observations in evolutionary genetics and molecular evolution and is thought to be a significant risk of extinction for small populations. However, much of the empirical evidence for the deleterious-mutation process derives from studies of Drosophila melanogaster, some of which have been called into question. We review a broad array of data that collectively support the hypothesis that deleterious mutations arise in flies at rate of about one per individual per generation, with the average mutation decreasing fitness by about only 2% in the heterozygous state. Empirical evidence from microbes, plants, and several other animal species provide further support for the idea that most mutations have only mildly deleterious effects on fitness, and several other species appear to have genomic mutation rates that are of the order of magnitude observed in Drosophila. However, there is mounting evidence that some organisms have genomic deleterious mutation rates that are substantially lower than one per individual per generation. These lower rates may be at least partially reconciled with the Drosophila data by taking into consideration the number of germline cell divisions per generation. To fully resolve the existing controversy over the properties of spontaneous mutations, a number of issues need to be clarified. These include the form of the distribution of mutational effects and the extent to which this is modified by the environmental and genetic background and the contribution of basic biological features such as generation length and genome size to interspecific differences in the genomic mutation rate. Once such information is available, it should be possible to make a refined statement about the long-term impact of mutation on the genetic integrity of human populations subject to relaxed selection resulting from modern medical procedures. © 1999 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deleterious mutation; fitness; mutation; mutation rate; mutational effect

Year:  1999        PMID: 28565627     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05361.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  66 in total

Review 1.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Molecular evolution, mutation size and gene pleiotropy: a geometric reexamination.

Authors:  Pablo Razeto-Barry; Javier Díaz; Darko Cotoras; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Predictions of patterns of response to artificial selection in lines derived from natural populations.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes.

Authors:  Charles F Baer; Frank Shaw; Catherine Steding; Margaret Baumgartner; Alicia Hawkins; Andrew Houppert; Nicole Mason; Marissa Reed; Kevin Simonelic; Wayne Woodard; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genomic mutation in lines of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to ultraviolet-B radiation.

Authors:  Joanna L MacKenzie; Fabienne E Saadé; Quang Hien Le; Thomas E Bureau; Daniel J Schoen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Persistence time of loss-of-function mutations at nonessential loci affecting eye color in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Lev Y Yampolsky; Chenoa Allen; Svetlana A Shabalina; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Effects of self-fertilization, environmental stress and exposure to xenobiotics on fitness-related traits of the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis.

Authors:  Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Laurent Lagadic
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 9.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Joint evolution of dispersal and inbreeding load.

Authors:  Frédéric Guillaume; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.