Literature DB >> 16510793

Joint evolution of dispersal and inbreeding load.

Frédéric Guillaume1, Nicolas Perrin.   

Abstract

Inbreeding avoidance is often invoked to explain observed patterns of dispersal, and theoretical models indeed point to a possibly important role. However, while inbreeding load is usually assumed constant in these models, it is actually bound to vary dynamically under the combined influences of mutation, drift, and selection and thus to evolve jointly with dispersal. Here we report the results of individual-based stochastic simulations allowing such a joint evolution. We show that strongly deleterious mutations should play no significant role, owing to the low genomic mutation rate for such mutations. Mildly deleterious mutations, by contrast, may create enough heterosis to affect the evolution of dispersal as an inbreeding-avoidance mechanism, but only provided that they are also strongly recessive. If slightly recessive, they will spread among demes and accumulate at the metapopulation level, thus contributing to mutational load, but not to heterosis. The resulting loss of viability may then combine with demographic stochasticity to promote population fluctuations, which foster indirect incentives for dispersal. Our simulations suggest that, under biologically realistic parameter values, deleterious mutations have a limited impact on the evolution of dispersal, which on average exceeds by only one-third the values expected from kin-competition avoidance.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510793      PMCID: PMC1461421          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.046847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  46 in total

1.  Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate.

Authors:  J Wang; W G Hill; D Charlesworth; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Evolutionarily stable dispersal rate in a metapopulation with extinctions and kin competition

Authors: 
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Dispersal and Inbreeding Avoidance.

Authors:  Nicolas Perrin; Vladimir Mazalov
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Evolution of stepping-stone dispersal rates.

Authors:  S Gandon; F Roussett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evolutionarily Stable Dispersal Rates Do Not Always Increase with Local Extinction Rates.

Authors:  Ophélie Ronce; Florence Perret; Isabelle Olivieri
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Local Competition, Inbreeding, and the Evolution of Sex-Biased Dispersal.

Authors:  Nicolas Perrin; Vladimir Mazalov
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  The genetic basis of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter.

Authors:  T Bataillon; M Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Inbreeding Depression and Genetic Rescue in a Plant Metapopulation.

Authors:  Christopher M Richards
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Kin competition, the cost of inbreeding and the evolution of dispersal

Authors: 
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-10-21       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  19 in total

1.  Does reduced heterozygosity influence dispersal? A test using spatially structured populations in an alpine ungulate.

Authors:  Aaron B A Shafer; Jocelyn Poissant; Steeve D Côté; David W Coltman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Surprising fitness consequences of GC-biased gene conversion. II. Heterosis.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Spatial heterogeneity in the strength of selection against deleterious alleles and the mutation load.

Authors:  D Roze
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Reduced microsatellite heterozygosity does not affect natal dispersal in three contrasting roe deer populations.

Authors:  Cécile Vanpé; Lucie Debeffe; A J Mark Hewison; Erwan Quéméré; Jean-François Lemaître; Maxime Galan; Britany Amblard; François Klein; Bruno Cargnelutti; Gilles Capron; Joël Merlet; Claude Warnant; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Mutation accumulation and the formation of range limits.

Authors:  Roslyn C Henry; Kamil A Bartoń; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  The roles of demography and genetics in the early stages of colonization.

Authors:  Marianna Szűcs; Brett A Melbourne; Ty Tuff; Ruth A Hufbauer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Dispersal as a means of inbreeding avoidance in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Marta Szulkin; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The demographic benefits of belligerence and bravery: defeated group repopulation or victorious group size expansion?

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inbreeding depression does not increase in foreign environments: a field experimental study.

Authors:  Joe Hereford
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.276

10.  Dispersing away from bad genotypes: the evolution of Fitness-Associated Dispersal (FAD) in homogeneous environments.

Authors:  Ariel Gueijman; Amir Ayali; Yoav Ram; Lilach Hadany
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.