Literature DB >> 28560225

Minimum Volume Standards in Surgery - Are We There Yet?

Hartwig Bauer1, Kim C Honselmann2,3.   

Abstract

The quality of surgery is directly dependent on the quantity, more specifically, on the number of operations performed at a given hospital as well as on the designated surgeon. This fact is supported by numerous studies and meta-analyses that will be presented in the following text. Most of the convincing data for complex procedures can be obtained from visceral (upper and lower gastrointestinal) surgery studies. Mortality of large oncological procedures, such as esophageal or pancreatic surgery, can be reduced by 50% if a certain number of interventions are guaranteed per year. Centralizing these operations performed by specialized surgeons is the key to success. This also ensures that the minimum volume amounts within a given hospital are well above the required levels, thus enabling to teach the necessary expertise step by step. The obligatory 'learning curve' for complex interventions cannot be completed within the framework of reference figures during residency training. Together, surgeons and their respective societies have introduced a proposal for efficient case-oriented centralized surgery. Whether 'we are there yet' in surgery will depend in the end on how these efforts will be incorporated into administrative requirements and the guidelines that will then be implemented across the board.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Center formation; Certification criteria; Failure to rescue; Minimum quantity regulations; Minimum volume standards; Surgery; Volume-outcome relationships

Year:  2017        PMID: 28560225      PMCID: PMC5447172          DOI: 10.1159/000456041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Visc Med        ISSN: 2297-4725


  58 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.

Authors:  M M Chowdhury; H Dagash; A Pierro
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  [Minimum Caseload Requirements and In-hospital Mortality: Observational Study using Nationwide Hospital Discharge Data from 2006 to 2013].

Authors:  U Nimptsch; D Peschke; T Mansky
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2016-04-06

4.  Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Deborah Schrag; Katherine S Panageas; Elyn Riedel; Laura D Cramer; Jose G Guillem; Peter B Bach; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Hospital-Level Factors Associated With Mortality After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Caitlin W Hicks; Elizabeth C Wick; Joseph K Canner; James H Black; Isibor Arhuidese; Umair Qazi; Tammam Obeid; Julie A Freischlag; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Achieving minimum caseload requirements--an analysis of hospital discharge data from 2005-2011.

Authors:  Dirk Peschke; Ulrike Nimptsch; Thomas Mansky
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Identification of patients with postoperative complications who are at risk for failure to rescue.

Authors:  Victor A Ferraris; Michael Bolanos; Jeremiah T Martin; Angela Mahan; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 8.  Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Joseph D Phillips; Colin E Rock; Amanda Hayman; Jay B Prystowsky; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Hospital readmission after noncardiac surgery: the role of major complications.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Arthur L Kellermann; Turner M Osler; Yue Li; Dana B Mukamel; Stewart J Lustik; Michael P Eaton; Andrew W Dick
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 10.  Volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Boris Zevin; Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Effects of volume on outcome in hepatobiliary surgery: a review with guidelines proposal.

Authors:  Eloisa Franchi; Matteo Donadon; Guido Torzilli
Journal:  Glob Health Med       Date:  2020-10-31

2.  Volume and Quality in Visceral Medicine.

Authors:  Klaus R Herrlinger; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-13

3.  [Barriers to the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) accreditation "Center for bariatric and metabolic surgery"].

Authors:  T Hasenberg; S Weiner; D Birk; E Bonrath
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Associations of hospital volume and hospital competition with short-term, middle-term and long-term patient outcomes after breast cancer surgery: a retrospective population-based study.

Authors:  Wouter van der Schors; Ron Kemp; Jolanda van Hoeve; Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen; John Maduro; Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters; Sabine Siesling; Marco Varkevisser
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Problematic Risk Adjustment in National Healthcare Safety Network Measures.

Authors:  Richard L Fuller; John S Hughes; Graham Atkinson; Barbara S Aubry
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 6.  Evidence in surgical training - a review.

Authors:  Tobias Fritz; Niklas Stachel; Benedikt J Braun
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2019-04-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.